-
They would review the serious allegations made under oath in the Trump lawsuits.
-
They would get legal subpoenas to IMMEDIATELY capture copies of the entire voter databases of all the blue cities committing mass voter faud, including any logs of changes made to data records.
-
They would audit for suspicious changes - YOU KNOW DEMOCRATS ARE RIGHT NOW FIXING ALL THOSE 1/1/1900 BIRTH DATES TO RANDOM DATES SO THEY CAN'T BE EASILY AUDITED.
-
The crime has been committed, and the coverup is in progress. But because our FBI never investigates Democrat crime, it looks like people are getting away with it.
We appear to be making the mistake of over-relying on a non-autistic source (Gateway Pundit) that is not going to help us win. I like GP, but in this case Jim Hoft is off. So please read the below and tell me if I'm wrong here.
If you remember, there was a 6K batch of votes in Oakland County Michigan that went in Biden's favor early on due to an alleged "glitch," and then was corrected and sent back to Trump. That was an error IN BIDEN'S FAVOR that was corrected when people recognized this was a red county and it was unlikely it broke for Biden.
The "19,500 vote glitch" being trumpeted in Wisconsin is in Rock County. This county was a blue county in 2016 and went for Hillary Clinton 51 to 41%. Most likely it is still a blue county, and therefore the votes were incorrectly posted for Trump, and then corrected back to Biden. Therefore, this was a glitch IN TRUMP'S FAVOR that was corrected.
Therefore the glitches are going both ways, and while they may be due to voter machine hijinks, they may also just be stupid human error.
Am I wrong about the above? Pedes, we need to think critically and find something Rudy can use in court to nail the cheaters. If we fail to think critically, we will waste our time navel gazing with fake news, like with the fake Biden polls before the election.
Check my work and stay frosty. Let's win this!
Rock County, WI 2016: https://www.co.rock.wi.us/results11082016
Rock County, WI 2020: https://www.co.rock.wi.us/results11032020
Title says it all.
-
Verify that mail in ballots were actually mailed to recipients. Get the database of ballots mailed out. Check whether addresses match. Check with USPS automated scanning to see whether they were actually mailed. Check whether addresses were correct.
-
Take rigorous scientific sampling of ballots and check watermarks to make sure each pile is legit.
-
Review security videos of ballot drop off locations. Was anyone stuffing more than one ballot in? If so, that's a strike against the legitimacy of this election.
-
Find all the dead people who voted in this election. What addresses and phone numbers were listed for them? Do we have any way to find the perpetrators of this blatant electoral fraud?
-
Find out who drove the vehicles, and who carried in the boxes of early morning ballots dropped off AFTER THE DEADLINE. Track which piles those ballots went into, and how they affected the vote. Those votes may need to be subtracted regardless because they were AFTER THE DEADLINE. But find the people involved and investigate the chain of custody. Is there an appropriate paper trail? Anything fishy?
-
Offer substantial financial rewards to whistleblowers who can provide real evidence and testimony about fraud that occurred in this election. Make the rewards contingent on getting actual investigative results - i.e. so they can't just say stuff and get free money.
-
Investigate all period when observers were not able to watch the voting and/or counting processes. Estimate how many votes were rendered illegitimate that way - because they absolutely were.
-
Seek out young people who participated in the election and interview them. There were lots of teenagers in the big cities. Young people like to talk and will happily reveal information that an older person might keep their mouth shut about.
-
Aggressively investigate all the stuff already blown wide open, such as in Milwaukee (Ilhan Omar Veritas Press sting), Texas, Nevada, Pennsylvania with USPS vote fraud.
-
For the Trump ballots dumped on the side of the roads or in the dump, determine who the USPS letter carriers would have been - because the addresses are right there on the envelopes. Interrogate them under suspicion of tampering with the election. Offer them leniency if they testify about others including higher-ups involved in vote fraud - again contingent on getting real results and not just people running their mouth.
... There are more things that can be done. But all of this is real and actionable in my opinion and could generate solid affidavits as well as criminal prosecutions that could be useful when Trump's case goes to the SCOTUS.
That's it. That's the post.
Pedes, I have created a GitHub with reproducible Benfords Law analysis of Milwaukee vote anomalies. This is designed to be rapidly extensible. Please please please, suggest more suspicious datasets and I can rapidly add them to this analysis.
Here's the webpage:
https://voteanalysis.github.io/benfordslaw_election2020/
... and here's the github page so anybody can reproduce my results:
Go get 'em, lawyers. James O'Keefe, if you've got anything, share it. This is all hands on deck.
You have to understand, Wikipedia's politics pages are run like a government protected organized crime syndicate. You have a list of approved left wing "reliable sources" like CNN (not joking), NYT, WaPo and so forth, and then you have "blacklisted" right wing sources like The Daily Caller and others.
The right wing sources are blacklisted due to publishing false information, following a debate process dominated by the left wing editors (and admins!) of Wikipedia. This is not totally crazy, because every news outlet that publishes articles every day will eventually publish something false. It is legitimate to ask how rigorous a news outlet's quality control is.
HOWEVER, the left wing sources are not held to the same standard. This is a classic Marxist tactic - they make a big deal about rules, but never apply them equally. They (mis)use them as a cudgel to beat their opponent, and let their favored friends off the hook.
Wikipedia uses this corrupt and dishonest scheme to censor things from articles. If left wing sources like the WaPo don't publish it, then left wing Wikipedia editors won't allow the information in a political article. This is how they work to keep a huge amount of true, verifiable, and factual info they don't like away from the millions of readers of Wikipedia. This is a huge problem and a contributor to low information voters out there.
Another thing! When a conservative comes into an article's Talk page (where you're supposed to build consensus around controversial content), the leftist editors have a standard routine they use on outsiders - they basically shut them out of the article editing process, and demand that every piece of content they contribute be substantiated by a "reliable source" - meaning an approved left leaning source on the official list. This would be reasonable if they were fair in how they define "reliable sources," but the reality is that they only allow left wing sources.
The way this often progresses is that the conservative editor will get frustrated and start criticizing the unfair process, at which point he is subject to censure and possibly topic banning by leftist admins. And of course if he loses his temper and actually tells things like they are for a brief moment, he's history - outta there.
So why do I even bother participating in this sham process? It's not to change the minds of the filthy lying commies I'm debating with. Nor do I expect to win, because the system is rigged. Nevertheless, I show up because I want to put them on the record with their lies, and also put something in the record that calmly, politely, courteously tells the truth about the political article in question. If they refuse to use the sources (news outlets) that document Biden family corruption or whatever it is, let them go on the record refusing to use it. I also take pride in refusing to lose my temper with them, because I know they want me to get mad, spew something, and get banned. That happens to lots of other people. Instead, I just politely put the truth they don't want to even think about in front of their faces.
How could this be improved? Well, if enough conservative, literate, smart, polished-writing people contributed to Wikipedia, we could take it over. Running in with rudeness and vandalism is NOT OK nor constructive. But an organic movement of conservative and patriotic minded individuals would be pretty awesome (important that it's done as individuals, as they will recognize and ban coordinated editing in a heartbeat).
The Trump movement is fulfilling Andrew Breitbart's vision of taking back the culture. Maybe someday Wikipedia... I can dream...
Title says it all.
