Will you stop with that stupid fucking canned reply. It accomplishes nothing other than bringing people down.
Your logic dictates we should just get in our knees and suck Biden’s dick.
You do you I'm not going to do it.
$200 for every magazine over 10 rounds. It applies retroactively under threat of $10,000 fine and 10 years in prison.
"End the online sale/transfer of firearms and ammunitions. Biden will enact legislation to prohibit all online sales of firearms, ammunition, kits, and gun parts."
"Individuals must also pay a $200 transfer tax, an amount that has not been changed since the NFA was established in 1934." That $200 will be charged retroactively for all currently owned Assault weapons and each related magazine owned with a capacity over 10. Penalty of $10k for each weapon or magazine and <=10 years in jail for each count.."
Ah, so you're one of those idiots I hear so much about!
If you had watched the videos I provided as sources you'd learn that it's primarily economics at this point being that we have 60 years of research in pressure vessel reactors and are currently building Gen III. Now that we know exactly how they work, even given their drawbacks compared to LFTRs, they don't require billions in research and development to start producing revenue- just construction costs.
Why would anyone want to have an educated opinion anyway when you can just use misplaced sarcasm to dismiss what you don't like instead of doing actual legwork?
Some of the claims addressed are just ridiculous on their face and discredit themselves.
Uranium 232 is a neutron poison It would take significant refining to get 233 pure.
Configuring for plutonium production would make it worse, unless that's the intention.
There are similar risks to processing and producing LWR fuel.
I already addressed the metallurgical issues.
Less waste with higher radioactivity means shorter half life.
These are the sources for your article:
nuclearfreeplanet.org nonukes.it industrytap.com envirosagainstwar.org
Obvious agenda is obvious.
Liquid fluoride thorium reactor burn radioactive waste as fuel.
Back in the when they started this research they decided against LFTR because it doesn't produce plutonium like Light Water Reactors. Needed it for the bomb programs.
They also can't melt down. Material science still has some work to do as I understand it to make it feasible to deal longer term with the hot liquid salt, but it's already proven to be a net positive reactor that's scalable. I know 10 years ago China was investing heavily in this research, but as a country they're not great at advanced metallurgy- it's why they buy Russian jets, strip the engines, and put them in their craft.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liquid_fluoride_thorium_reactor
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uK367T7h6ZY - you should find Kirk Sorensen's full talk if this interests you.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F92L6F0INYk - Illinois Energy Prof Talk
Shit sucks sometimes. Very little of the good things are just handed to you! We are stronger than we remember!
Are you a manager? Hire MAGA!
Are you HR? Promote MAGA!
Are you a small business? MAGA Network!
We are 80,000,000 strong! We are the backbone they can't function without!
So goes America, so goes the world- not for government, but the might of the people!
And what heads up are you offering? Nothing. You're just a late to the pity party karma whore posting the obvious so people that also see the obvious agree you so you can all feel sooooo smart for pointing out the fucking obvious in a way that only brings people down.
Get fucked. No one needs that here when there's a hundred other of you fuckers posting the same shit in every thread.