Looks like they used cells at least at one point to test flavoring, but they are not actually in the products themselves. Still horrific, but not what some sites made it out to be. https://www.lifenews.com/2018/06/08/pro-life-group-releases-list-of-products-cosmetics-and-vaccines-made-using-cells-from-aborted-babies/
We don't see many fights happening in congressional elections. Even if the entire election is deemed bunk, I get the feeling most of the congressional houses will still go through, and then the presidency will go to house delegations, where Trump still has the advantage.
When it comes to electronics, repairability is my number one priority. All of my computers are 8-10 years old because so many newer ones have most or all of the components soldered in and nowadays even software locked to their individual device. Phone is 5 years old.
Check out Louis Rossmann, he is doing a lot of work in the right to repair field.
You don't need a new computer and/or phone every two or three years unless you are doing high end work in industry. I really don't understand people who need that new device and look at their old one with disdain. If I see someone rocking a seven year old laptop, I'm going to think much more highly of them than someone with a brand new one.
The Great reset in short is about rolling back the industrial revolution.
Yet for some reason they call it the oncoming fourth industrial revolution. There's no progress being made when you own nothing and according to them will be happy.
Shipped from the USA is nice because you don't have to wait several months for something to arrive direct from China. As much as I hate buying from China, some things I use can only be bought from there. Not necessarily a scam, depends on how it's advertised.
A shill for what? I’m not saying I know better than her, I most certainly don’t. My point is that her bold claims should be saved for and revealed in court alongside her evidence. I’m not claiming she is lying, I just believe it is imprudent to make such statements on TV when she is unable to present evidence backing it up. I know she can’t produce evidence publicly before using it in court, however making such extreme claims while being unable to provide evidence only provides ammo for further discrediting her and sows doubt about how much she really has.
What she had said initially was plenty, continuously adding more claims just muddies the waters a bit.
On Newsmax she said that Georgia’s governor was in on it. I think she’s making a lot of wild claims that seem questionable. Even if she has evidence, they are so far fetched that they should be brought out first in court when evidence can be used instead of first being claimed on television, where they can be used to harm credibility.
Yeah, but he also shoved a dildo up his ass on camera to own the libs.