13
dataonly 13 points ago +13 / -0

And that is how its done!

Brave Patriots, Standing Up!

4
dataonly 4 points ago +4 / -0

Wow. You guys are amazing. Thank you for your efforts!

1
dataonly 1 point ago +1 / -0

Baryonic above was laying out ways to make it secure w/ modern technology.

Guess the alternative is move forward or move backward.

1
dataonly 1 point ago +1 / -0

Good point. BTW, the GAB page look, layout, and presentation is also preferable.

2
dataonly 2 points ago +2 / -0

Very impressive.

1
dataonly 1 point ago +2 / -1

The only option is for all of them to open and operate. Band together and go to court. The courts have been siding w/ business owners more often than not.

6
dataonly 6 points ago +7 / -1

The end of the Repub party as previously known. Will move forward the the Trump Repub party.

Every single RINO must be primary'd w/ a Trump Repub, or America First Repub (same thing).

7
dataonly 7 points ago +7 / -0

I don't think anyone is surprised by anything anymore.

1
dataonly 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think you are right in that what is already publicly available is staggering. I agree w/ your assessment that the its widespread and systemic.

I actually had a thread yesterday regarding DEM cheating in 1960 w/ JFK and Nixon.

I took what he said to mean that no matter what you have evidence wise, you need court results.

1
dataonly 1 point ago +1 / -0

now necessary to prove it in court

That is the main point right there.

1
dataonly 1 point ago +2 / -1

Cotton has been solid in his support of the President. He's been ardent defender.

He is the type Senator we need along w/ Cruz, Paul, and Lee.

And he is right. It is time for evidence in court rooms. All the press conferences in the world will not make a difference. A court room judgement will.

35
dataonly 35 points ago +35 / -0

The fact of the matter is you are normally voting for the lesser of two unsatisfactory options. Trump was the exception.

1
dataonly 1 point ago +1 / -0

I thought it was 70% of the precincts did not reconcile

Not sure.

0
dataonly 0 points ago +1 / -1

Massive voter fraud has been identified. Anyone with any knowledge of statistics can see that. It was all about the mail in ballots that were harvested in massive numbers.

There may also be major fraud as a result of algorithms, hacking, malware, etc.

None of this is being proven in court at this time.

0
dataonly 0 points ago +1 / -1

What specifically did he not understand?

Even Rush today pointed out that the information that is being provided by Rudy and Sidney has to get into a court and win.

2
dataonly 2 points ago +2 / -0

doesn't mean I won't be part of a "pep rally"

That is actually well stated and I agree.

But, Have been in a few convos lately where instead of response to legitimate questions regarding legality, court proceedings, strategy, etc, the reponse is just "doomer and gloomer". Reality is reality. We all want Trump and believe there were illegal shenanigans that swung this election. Correcting that is quite another issue.

2
dataonly 2 points ago +2 / -0

Fair. I will edit.

1
dataonly 1 point ago +1 / -0

Doomering

Discussing strategy, asking questions, referencing precedent, factual evaluations, etc. should not be perceived as being a "doomer."

Its beneficial conversation.

2
dataonly 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think Gore sued in state court first after certification. State court sided w/ Bush. We thought it was over. Gore appealed to State Supreme Court. They sided w/ Gore and the recount started.

Bush team appealed to USSC. Ted Olson argued the case. Supremes ended recount. People always say that Bush won 5-4 in USSC but I recently read that the Supremes broke 7-2 in support of the Bush's equal protection argument. The 5-4 decision was in regards to the remedy I think.

1
dataonly 1 point ago +1 / -0

USSC may not be of any help if it goes past that date.

Sen Rubio had actually proposed changing the Safe Harbor date to Jan1 months ago. But it went no where in the Senate.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›