Their screengrab also shows 41 million doses administered for a <.003% death rate. I'm not taking the vaccine since the long-term effects are unknown (aside: still confounds me as to why people advocate for taking the vaccine because of covid's unknown long-term effects lol), but I also don't want to put my foot in my mouth trying to educate other people. There are few quicker ways to lose your credibility than to cite misleading statistics. Indeed, this is exactly why we don't trust MSM and so many influential voices.

The brainwashed masses we try to redpill are looking for any reason at all to discredit us, so please, don't make their job easy.

The rules were house team goes first and can reserve time to get last word. Fair? No. Agreed to by McConnell? Well he had to.

You still view them as human beings?

Sadly not just contemplate.

I (and I think like many others) got here because I stopped believing the bullshit I read all day long just because a blue checkmark or a "trusted" newspaper said it. I looked at the original source material and the context and realized what we're fed by the MSM and pop culture is a load of crap. Everyone here knows that. Still, I've noticed a lot of people here don't often think for themselves anymore when it comes to tdw posts and I believe this is dangerous. No matter what, never stop thinking for yourself.

To be fair, the original tweet was in Spanish, but I think this is a pretty decent translation. The original said agricultores y campesinos. Agricultores definitely translates as farmers, but campesinos could translate as peasants or farmers. Obviously, considering the context, they weren't trying to say "farmers and farmers" it must have been intentional to mean "farmers and peasants". I wonder if he wrote this - I have to assume he knows Spanish.

Absolute disgrace. Hope our fine men and women in uniform remember this if the time comes.

99.99%. Could someone positive come cough on me, I'd like to build my immune system, thanks.

99.8% survival becomes 99.74% survival lmao. What a joke.

Definitely agree. I suspect we (at least people in my bracket or above) will be taxed more though and they'll use expanded welfare as part of the justification. "Trump's mishandling of the virus in the critical early hours led to this" is what they'll say. The masses will laud it a) because it bashes Trump and b) it doesn't immediately affect them. So to put it in your analogy - it's still going on credit, but our minimum monthly payment will go up.

I will suffer because after all I've worked for to pull myself out of poverty, they'll be telling me "fuck you".

Then they'll just go on expanded welfare courtesy of Xiden, paid for by you and me.

This is what the globalists want. I doubt they trust our military to roll over and accept a globalist takeover.

At least where I grew up, sports were segregated as early as third grade. We're now allowing moms to brainwash their male toddlers that they're actually little girls and they'll end up crushing real ones in third grade. How demoralizing do you think that will be to the real girls?

Or in this case, the enemy of my enemy whom they claim is their friend for optics is a group I can tolerate for a time.

But, but, but "grab her by the pussy!" Well little normie, he apologized for that repeatedly, he is just human afterall. ORANGE MAN BAD!!!

I thought the argument was that a wall is an economically inefficient method to prevent illegal immigration? Let's assume it is - they still implicitly concede that it is effective (just too expensive). Isn't it far, far more inefficient to literally spend money to remove this preventative measure?

Oh, what's that you say? It was never about saving taxpayer dollars? It was just about finding some way to convince normal people that they should hate walls? Now I understand.

Well hey at least we got Kodak Black /s

No Assange. Terrible shame.

They didn't want to feel his hairy legs? That's kind of weird.

I got frightened by that capitol gains tax. After some research, it seems it only applies if income is over $1 million (assumed annual basis, but didn't find anything definitive).

Also found in my research: after tax income will decrease for EVERY income group, and this is BEFORE inflation. So basically, Biden and Kamala lied through their teeth over and over (big surprise, I know). Also, GDP will decrease over the next decade. I wonder what will happen to China's GDP over the next 10 years? What a treasonous, incompetent sack of garbage.

"America is not a timid nation of tame souls who need to be sheltered and protected from those with whom we disagree." Translation: "Joe Biden, you're an unamerican pussy"

It'll be tough to live stream. Record the evidence and release it through less liberal channels later.

This is true. We're at war with the globalists. Tomorrow is a battle, and a very big one. Over the last four years, we've won and lost many, yet the war wages on. Even crossing the rubicon won't end the war, though it would be a huge step towards this. No matter what happens, the work is not done. For me, the war isn't over until I'm dragged from my house or blacklisted for employment, and so I'm going to keep the energy until then.

Just think of all of the people whose eyes have been opened by all of this shit, don't concede if we lose a battle, because we're trying to win a war.

Idk about you, but even if there's nothing today or tomorrow, I'm still hopeful for the future. He's got all the secrets and he still has powerful friends. If he wasn't a threat, they wouldn't still be attacking him.

Well of course they don't get flagged. They only flag and ban when the tweets incite violence. Why would 24/7 gaslighting and 4+ years of relentless assault on a 100% legitimate president cause violence? Please just trust the leadership at Twitter - they're very smart.