Sure maybe they're crazy, but they're a hell of a lot more loyal and less doomer than a lot of folks these days.
The minute I hear Biden concede, I'm going to the grocery store to stock up for at least a month. We'll see riots we can't even imagine.
Finally a good handshake account, thanks patriot.
Looks like the video isn't available any longer? Anyone back it up?
I mean, I would think the plan would be to turn the lights on the roaches for everyone to see. Mission accomplished? I've spoken to some libs and a few of them are starting to see. They've censored and blacklisted the most powerful man in the world, they've impeached him with an embarrassing lack of evidence (and now we learn the impeachers may actually be the ones who coordinated violence), they've completely gas lit any and all claims about election fraud, they've completely hidden the hunter Biden scandal. He's exposed hypocrisy in the strongest sense imaginable to the masses.
Second, if the GOP wants to exist in 2022, they know they need to fight tooth and nail for these issues: impeachment of Biden (if sworn in), section 230, investigation into the election, hunter Biden, and professional agitators. Even with that, it will be a longshot, but it is really their only hope.
Until the 20th, I won't be throwing in the towel, because I don't know what else he's got up his sleeve. What I do know is Trump loves his country and will never stop fighting for it. Does he need to be president to do this? No, not really.
710000 people watching now, absolutely mindboggling
We really have the best shitposters
My liberal fiance finally swallowed the red pill today just a few months after me. It was truly magical to watch, save for her entire world view being shattered.
"To those who broke the law, you will pay" stood out to me when I listened to it. This wording is awfully complicated and it just doesn't sound like Trump's usual manner of speaking. I would expect "The rioters will pay", but nope, we got a word salad.
The damage is done. He says the journey is just beginning. He may not be president come January 20, but by God, we will not let them take our freedom. Be grateful that he has shown us and many more just how evil the deep state is.
I always try to think of how something could be so. In this case, the document itself does not mention any violence. It just calls out congressmen for wanting to object, statements which had been made at the beginning of the year.
We need to see the full draft to jump to this conclusion. I see lots of other potential evidence indicating this was planned, but I don't think we can say this is just yet.
It certainly could be that he's laying in wait. I noticed something concerning in the Zuck letter - he said "[Facebook] determined the president is inciting violence" more or less. Facebook (or any company) doesn't get to choose that, or at least, don't get so much freedom to determine that.
Concession in quotes because that's what it's being called. It was really a great message - looks like concession to most, but we know it's not.
He's still got several cards in his hand. Only a fool would go this far into the lions' den without the goods.
Concession was in quotes because that's what others are calling it, and to the uninformed, it certainly appears to be. We know it wasn't. Yes, everything is intentional, but how can you claim to always know the intention. I think he needed it to simultaneously look like a concession to the masses and an encouragement to supporters. If so, he clearly achieved that.
Sickens me that all I've seen before this is pictures of the Confederate flag and raising the Trump flag. God forbid they highlight our patriotism.
I am furious at her reasoning. I never had an ounce of faith in Loeffler - too much money on the line for her.
He was a total moron, but I believe he said "... our forefathers AND foremothers, I don't even know if that's a word...".
I'm literally shaking with rage. Absolutely unbelievable that Loeffler would reverse LIKE THAT. "I was going to object because there were apparent issues, but I won't now because people are pissed off about these issues."
That would not be fantastic, but man, those would be some salty liberal tears lol.
My favorite part is when he said something to the effect of " your lawyer is saying things about the ballots he doesn't know". He clearly has the goods to know the lawyer was lying through his teeth.
Maybe the mayor thinks they're being clever, but I see this as an opportunity for the patriotic restaurants to distract the police. If they refuse to close on the sixth, at least part of the force will be tied up with that.
I didn't hear that testimony, but was it regarding a Wi-Fi password? Because that looks to be a Wi-Fi password. I can see the harm either way though.
Did congress not expect public backlash? The bill is almost too bad. Perhaps they needed to give Trump an opportunity to create some unity. Perhaps this is because they've been talking with his team and know the fraud was caught. They know when they're exposed and Trump is made president again, a civil war could erupt. Who will the people come for? It is far better to paint themselves as human garbage and avoid the war. Their constituents will forget in 2 years anyway. Perhaps the congressmen enabling this unification are to be given immunity when the hammer comes down.
You know what I don't understand?
They claim that suggesting voter fraud occurred incites violence. These folks are supposedly experts in civic engagement, yet they don't even acknowledge the possibility for violence from unequivocally stating that no fraud could have possibly occurred. You have well over a hundred million Americans that know significant fraud occurred (even if the execs think otherwise, they must acknowledge the beliefs of their user base). In what world would constantly being told you're wrong and a conspiracy theorist NOT lead to violence?
On the surface, this video doesn't seem to be too damning as they say seemingly reasonable things: censorship [of fraud accusations] in the name of keeping the peace. Now, there are two possibilities. First, the leadership at Twitter child be completely incompetent and not realize the possibility for violence when gaslighting the hell out of users. This would be very troubling for such incompetent people to be making these decisions, but I find this possibility quite unlikely. Second, they could be aware of the hypocrisy and carefully avoiding talking about it. This is far more dangerous because it shows how they can get away with selectively applying their own policies. I find this possibility far more likely, and far more dangerous.
So I just don't understand how more people can't see this hypocrisy. Perhaps we're just too brainwashed to think for ourselves anymore (not you lovely pedes, the rest of the world).