1
deeznutsamericana 1 point ago +1 / -0

apparently in 1860, 25% of new orleans black residents owned slaves, about 3,000 slaveholders

https://americancivilwar.com/authors/black_slaveowners.htm

6
deeznutsamericana 6 points ago +6 / -0

they are all old and will die of age. We must keep their kin out of office!

3
deeznutsamericana 3 points ago +3 / -0

"I have an idea! we count votes not by person, but through a mechanical device! There is no way to tell if it is counting accurately, and the operators actually have the ability to change the output if they so wanted"

gunshot

1
deeznutsamericana 1 point ago +1 / -0

whenever he was on tucker you could clearly see him waving the democrat dishonesty in your face, and that their followers are idiots that will eat it up. its so vacuous

2
deeznutsamericana 2 points ago +2 / -0

shit when you get that high up in the military you start serving the profits of large corporations over any sort of patriotism. I'd assume they are more democrat than not.

1
deeznutsamericana 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's what my dad says when I point out some major political points that are set in the background of the MSM...

8
deeznutsamericana 8 points ago +8 / -0

everything they were using to cheat was probably tapped. he was probably directly referencing their plans

1
deeznutsamericana 1 point ago +2 / -1

white suburban women acting like ghetto gansters is the most cringe thing possible

3
deeznutsamericana 3 points ago +3 / -0

15 DAYS TO SLOW THE SPREAD, MONTH 12'

this is an exercise in power to show trump they will crash the economy if it means ousting him.

3
deeznutsamericana 3 points ago +3 / -0

don't forget AI face recognition. The amazon store may be just a demo, but you can bet your ass the same AI is being used in every corporate store around america right now.

2
deeznutsamericana 2 points ago +2 / -0

the communications decency act section 230 was basically designed so the entire internet doesn't become porn. It defines the difference between a publisher and a platform. publisher is the NYT. They are responsible for what they post. Facebook is a platform, I can post whatever I want, and they can't be held liable for it. Literally illegal to sue them for damages.

The issue is these companies are intentionally misinterpreting "otherwise objectionable" to mean political opinions they don't like. By removing CDA 230 protections, this makes it so people like alex jones can sue for damages because facebook is acting like a publisher and not a platform by moderating based on political views.