2
deliquo 2 points ago +2 / -0

Oooh, Brooklyn Nine-Nine is gonna be DOUBLE CANCELLED NOW! :)

5
deliquo 5 points ago +5 / -0

This is absolutely the follow-on step.

Their false proposition is that if the statues of founders are illegitimate, their ideas are as well.

12
deliquo 12 points ago +12 / -0

The United States of America lost 5% of its adult male population freeing the slaves and securing the union.

In the late 1800's, the loss of a MALE family member was staggering cost in the lives of families.

The cost we have already paid ensured an entire generation of slaves were freed and stopped another generation from being born into slavery.

21
deliquo 21 points ago +21 / -0

The only way to get a reprieve from their psychosis will be an overwhelming victory.

A massive landslide will be so shocking to some they just MIGHT wake up and see through the media lies.

Some never will, but the bigger the victory the greater the chance we will save some of our fellow Americans from their cultish trap.

So fight for every vote. Work your friends, neighbors, family.

Assume nothing.

55
deliquo 55 points ago +55 / -0

We will consume the Republican Party.

We will go toe to toe with the Critical Race Theory zealots, Antifa, and Socialists.

We will allow a few old guard Republicans to serve with us "if they can."

The rest must go in an orderly fashion that allows us to replace them with fighters.

1
deliquo 1 point ago +1 / -0

In a very quick donor search, I found three contributions in the name of the wife to RNC last year. edit: I thought they were to DJT, but they were RNC.

They are lawyers so judging their beliefs is difficult.

2
deliquo 2 points ago +2 / -0

They entered through a metal gate onto private property. They were not merely in "a neighborhood" walking city owned sidewalks.

10
deliquo 10 points ago +10 / -0

I look at Rasmussen because they're the only poll still doing daily presidential approval AND you can compare presidents at the same 'point in their term.'

So I look at Trump 6/25/2020 (+3 years and 6 months in) compared to Obama at 6/25/2012, the same point and distance until the election.

Trump v. Obama

+12% on Strongly Approve (Trump 35% vs. Obama 23%) <--THIS

+1% Strongly Disapprove (Trump 44% vs. Obama 43%)

+1% Total Approve (Trump 47% vs. Obama 46%)

-1% Total Disapprove (Trump 51% vs. Obama 52%)

Same methodology, automated survey so no meddling by poll takers asking question in a leading way. Year after year, call after call. It's consistent and comparable.

That +12% is huge and otherwise he's essentially exactly where Obama was this far out from the 2012.

Think about that in the context of Kung Flu, neo-Marxist riots, a press that hates him, the failed muh-Russia circle jerk and so on.

Lefties complain about Rasmussen being biased in some way they can never pin down, but it's consistent without regard to who's in office. It's a poll compared to itself with only the POTUS changed.

https://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/about_us/methodology

https://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/trump_administration/trump_approval_index_history

https://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_administration/obama_approval_index_history

2
deliquo 2 points ago +2 / -0

Just to add gas to the fire, Cognizant is also the number one H1-B sponsor in 2020. So Facebook (and all big tech) is outsourcing major functions to companies that also import massive numbers of STEM workers.

The imported labor drives down wages for U.S. STEM graduates, particularly at the entry level. That includes minorities and women they constantly wring their hands about as underrepresented in these jobs. They have no interest in competing with an army of Chinese/Indian labor that's working 30% below average rate, indentured under threat of deportation by corporations.

There's a very interesting opportunity for white/blue collar MAGA to gut the foundation of the "D" party. This week Trump seem to indicate he gets it.

33
deliquo 33 points ago +40 / -7

The hypocrisy angle on Muhammad is OK, but it's not terribly persuasive for anyone that doesn't already see it. The left turns a blind eye to themselves.

Overall, Tucker feels off the mark tonight. If the citizens in your city or state like watching it burn, keep your leadership. If not, vote their asses out. You really can't call the president and have him remove them. It doesn't work that way.

Also, the president doesn't run 911 in small cities in Virginia. That situation absolutely sucks I didn't want Obama chiming in on every local event 911 call. I don't want Trump doing it.

16
deliquo 16 points ago +16 / -0

They also shut down his previous effort to examine the Bin Laden hard drives and intel collected. I wonder who that implicated.

8
deliquo 8 points ago +8 / -0

I doubt she was ever a Facebook employee. Just like O'Keefe keeps blurring the line calling Cognizant, Facebook. They just outsource all that work. It gives them deniability.

I'd have to go back over his testimony, but Zuck gets to say "No Facebook employees do that ..."

5
deliquo 5 points ago +5 / -0

So far all she did was remove the word "Facebook" from her profile.
The employment dates are the same.

I'm not taking their word that Facebook removed her from the contract.

4
deliquo 4 points ago +4 / -0

"dangerous self-righteousness" nails it.

13
deliquo 13 points ago +13 / -0

I used this site and searched on my city/area, pushed out the data to everyone I know on social media. I want to show them every single company/employer in my area that's bringing in foreign labor to take the jobs of their kids.

https://www.myvisajobs.com/Reports/2019-H1B-Visa-Sponsor.aspx

11
deliquo 11 points ago +12 / -1

Yeah, I'm kind of cool with Japan. You know... 'cause Nintendo and stuff. :)

25
deliquo 25 points ago +25 / -0

Google searches filtered by date, will show the first mention of Boogaloo in this context was an article at the ADL in late 2019. One search result for ALL TIME prior to 12/31/2019. All the other references are to more tradition, dance, music topics.

It's propaganda.

2
deliquo 2 points ago +4 / -2

You've got it. At 3:22 you can see glasses in the hands of "black backpack man". "green/black backpack man" has the skateboard until he puts it down to attack man in blue.

Then "black backpack man (with glasses still in hand)" picks up the skateboard for a supporting shot while man in blue grapples with "green/black packpack man"

3
deliquo 3 points ago +5 / -2

Sunglasses. AT 3:22, you can see the "man in black with black backpack" is carrying sunglasses.

Skateboard is the weapon and belongs to the "man in black with the green/black pack". He puts it down to attack the man in blue.

"black backpack man", picks up the other man's skateboard and uses it to swing at (hit) the man in blue.

No knife, but he picked up a weapon and used it on the man.

12
deliquo 12 points ago +13 / -1

They'll likely claim he had an intent to shoot someone because he brought a weapon with him, forethought.

If he can demonstrate he's essentially an every-day carry kind of guy, that claim goes out the window and he merely assessed a deadly threat while trying to retreat and defended himself.

Reminder, always be carrying if legal where you are.

1
deliquo 1 point ago +1 / -0

When grifters selectively promote secondary definitions of words and beat them into the heads of African Americans daily, this is what you get.

ffs - No one at Github ever thought, "Gee, this will sure keep blacks reminded of slavery".

Can't wait until they tackle 'braking systems.'

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›