1
desertdan 1 point ago +1 / -0

(Westminster Catechism 25:6) “There is no other head of the church but the Lord Jesus Christ; nor can the Pope of Rome in any sense be the head thereof; but is that Antichrist, that man of sin, and that son of perdition, that exalteth himself in the church against Christ, and all that is called God”

64
desertdan 64 points ago +64 / -0

Indignant people’s day.

6
desertdan 6 points ago +6 / -0

This lisping douche is worst than Cucker.

9
desertdan 9 points ago +9 / -0

Kraken Kraken Kraken ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn (oops) Kraken Kraken

0
desertdan 0 points ago +1 / -1

No. Stay bitter. Some mispelled words to feed your OCD thier somez gud mixtyped wurdz

0
desertdan 0 points ago +1 / -1

If the manager said wear a mask and the idiot pulled out a bat and beat him to death with it would the arrest be because of masks or because some idiot broke rhe law?

“But officer what did the manager say first”

lol pathetic

(I skipped a comma for you)

0
desertdan 0 points ago +1 / -1

Reeeeeeee masks Reeeeeee my mad grammar skillz Reeeeee skip all logical steps and talk about Reeeeeee masks.

0
desertdan 0 points ago +1 / -1

No you haven’t. You can’t. Get educated? Lol. Here is s summary. I didn’t use full sentences just to trigger your OCD.

Reality: Private property. Asked to leave. Refuses. (legal definition of trespassing). Police arrest for trespassing.

Your version:

Reeeeeeeeeeeee masks.

0
desertdan 0 points ago +1 / -1

Nice don’t argue ideas when you are too dumb argue spelling. Good idea. Not really critical thinking, but if you aren’t smart enough to do ideas like an adult, argue spellling!121121222!!!!!!’

(notice the comma splice? I added it as a special treat)

-1
desertdan -1 points ago +1 / -2

A spelling flame. The mark of a true intellectual.

-1
desertdan -1 points ago +1 / -2

Mask mandates has absolutely nothing to do with anything other than an being an example of your complete lack of any critical thinking skills and inability to stay on topic.

-3
desertdan -3 points ago +1 / -4

Yeah you chain alot of assumptions together while being ignorant of the basis of any of them while falsely claiming things you think should be equivalent actually are equivalent.

This isn’t about politics it is about critical thinking skills or the lack of them.

-1
desertdan -1 points ago +1 / -2

All irrelevant

Question: Do conservatives support private property?

Question Do conservatives support personal responsibility for ones actions?

Answer: This one does.

-1
desertdan -1 points ago +1 / -2

Why. Some fool is asked to leave private property. His refusal causes his trespass arrest. Nothing else. Pretty simple.

The clouds of stupid must be seriously dense for someone not to see this.

-1
desertdan -1 points ago +1 / -2

Sure. Cure autism now.

That line?

-1
desertdan -1 points ago +1 / -2

Because he refused to comply with store policies. Also, I am no more a shill anymore than you are rational or smart.

0
desertdan 0 points ago +2 / -2

Damn your dumb.

What lead to the trespassing charge was a customer not leaving when told to by the store manager. Nothing else.

Still not getting it?

-1
desertdan -1 points ago +1 / -2

What led to it were corporate policies. You are the CEO of edible crayons not tdw so the analogy fails.

-1
desertdan -1 points ago +1 / -2

That would be the policy dealing with customers asked to leave by the manager who refuse and trespass. The same as you getting banned for open carrying in walmart in states where it is legal.

100% about admitedly gay corporate policy and 0% about mask (or gun law). The only applicable law is trespass law.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›