Except for he does and most of y'all are just children who are too young to remember but the dude has quite the history taking down feds......

Or you simply have a shit memory and have never paid attention to the news, but at least if it's the child thing, then there's somewhat of an excuse.....

Because he's not in love with the camera like Dr fauci?

I'm sorry, but I would much rather someone in Durham's capacity never go in front of the camera.... Call me crazy, but it seems like we have enough TV stars as federal employees already......

Then you were lied to because Durham actually has a history of taking down feds and agents, while Mueller has the history of covering up crimes.....

I'm sorry that you are too fucking young to know what you're talking about, or have no memory, but Durham has a fucking history of taking down feds...

He has always been the very last fucking person that the feds wanted to be appointed to investigate them......

You should actually know what you're talking about before you open your mouth.

so basically what you're telling us is that you don't think he actually exist because he's not fauci who's in love with the camera?

Except for everything in his past career says the complete opposite about who he is as an investigator and prosecutor....

He's always been the very last person the corrupt feds wanted appointed to investigate them......

He's the one who changed it to a special counsel fully, but no, he was appointed by Jeff Sessions and started his investigation while Jeff Sessions was still the Attorney General....

Nooo..... He is still going to be in his role as special counseling/special prosecutor.... that is a separate thing completely...

he's only resigning from the US attorney's office....

They literally tried to impeach Trump over firing one person..... Can you think you could have gotten away with that.... Kek

Well he sort of changed the case into a special counsel to widen his scope even more, but Jeff sessions is the one who appointed Durham to start his investigation while sessions was still the AG....

Sessions appointed Durham.....

Not sure if you know that because most people don't know that, but Durham's investigation was actually started that far back....

Except for the type of investigation we did does not hold up in court... the burden of proof in court is outrageously higher....

With how we all know the court system is, don't you think they would have to have a completely ironclad case x2 to have any chance of actually landing a conviction and sentence for any of these people?

There's fucking difference from being sure of something / knowing something VS actually having the type of evidence that works in court...

And if he had tried any of them early and failed on any one of the cases, it would have been set precedent for every case they tried to bring after that......

But everyone in this thread wants to wave their little flag and pretend like they have any clue how all of this shit works or how complex it really is....

Which is old news and something we knew about quite a few weeks ago.....

Except for the fact that nothing in his history says that that's the kind of investigator or prosecutor he was.... In fact, his career says quite the opposite.....

Found any goodies yet that we didn't already know or haven't already seen?

Ok maybe that's what it is

I love this!

No, that he didn't fight back against it in the end

Nothing breaking about it, we've known for a while

It?

So now people that are born with vaginas are no longer female? are we really moving the goal post to genetic tests only?

She had only one visible genitalia at birth, and that was a vagina......

most of the time patients with undescended testicles don't even find out about it until they hit puberty when they have her specific set of conditions....

Except for she was born with a vagina..... but if you genetically test her she has the XY chromosome like a man.... None of which is her fault, obviously... but are we now going to move the goal post and say that you have to be assigned male or female by genetic test and not by what fucking genitals you have, because I'm pretty sure our argument has always been the genital one..............

So how exactly do we deal with these situations? because as of right now most of the people in this thread are being as big of hypocrites as the left are on a daily basis.....

Ok Michael Phelps has a condition that allows him to produce much more less lactic acid than anyone else, which is what allows him to swim such long distances without getting tired when everybody else would....... I guess we should ban him too.....?

She was born with a vagina and assigned female at birth because they saw a fucking vagina....

Raise him as a girl?.....

She has a fucking vagina that she was given by God at birth... What the fuck are y'all even talking about?

How can we be any more hypocritical than this very thread?

Caster has a vagina.... That she was given by God at birth....

Soooo

How? A slippery slope entails that it could change it for other people, but it can't because you have to be born that way.... You can't just decide to give yourself a condition that he/she had.....

not to mention, let's say it does happen like that but your parents never tell you and simply raise you as a girl but then you get in high school and want to play sports then what how the fuck is that any different than the reverse situation of parents trying to make boys into little girls or the reverse, but only because they want to and not because of any genetic abnormality?

they don't exactly fall into one category or the other and the parents made the decision for them at birth..... You might not even have a fucking clue that anything's wrong until damn near your teenage years, especially if homeschooled.... So what then? Punish the kid for something that is 100% out of their control?

"sorry kid, but the condition you were born with creates a slippery slope.... so go fuck yourself!"

So a hermaphrodite just can't play sports at all??.....