If the “shills” have thus far been correct about everything, then reality unfortunately belongs to them. That might be because they’re not fucking shills to begin with.
Trump is going to leave office and Biden is going to replace him, whether or not you like it. That you desperately don't want that to happen is not reason to insist that some specious magic shit is going to rescue Trump.
The military, exactly like every other institution, does not have Trump's back. No magic deus ex machina is going to keep Trump from leaving office and Biden from taking his place. Pretending otherwise isn't "supporting" Trump; it's just arrant delusion.
It's not a question of arrogance or the lack thereof. The sheer amount of time wasted trusting that the next randomly chosen deus ex machina is going to suddenly save the day, in the complete absence of evidence, is itself dangerous. Trump is going to leave office, and then stay out of office, and a material chunk of the people most invested in Trump and his legacy are going to sit around and do nothing because everyone is too busy waiting for whatever the next rationalization is. There are already people claiming that if Biden is inaugurated it's some kind of extended sting operation and that Trump is going to swoop in with FEMA in several months and arrest everyone.
The military in DC is there to maintain order in the runup and during the Biden inauguration. The "highest military class" absolutely will side with Biden, as every major institution already has, including the Joint Chiefs. The military is not going to rescue Trump any more than Pence or SCOTUS were going to, and the idea that they will, or that some other deus ex machina is going to occur, is just emotionally motivated delusion.
If Biden isn't inaugurated, of course I'll apologize and admit that I was completely wrong. It would be a first, since I've been correct about every single other delusional piece of nonsense the desperate of this site have clung to, whether the lawsuits, krakens, SCOTUS, Pence, etc.
Biden will be inaugurated. I take it we're agreed then - whichever one of us was wrong will admit it openly?
You sound like a caricature of a pede.
Biden is about to be inaugurated. That is a suboptimal outcome, but pretending otherwise because you lack the courage or intelligence to admit that something you desperately don't want to happen is going to happen is pathetic, not admirable.
Not at all, if we're using the word 'retard' in anything even remotely approaching the conventional sense. It's perhaps embarrassing to you that your intuitions about linguistics have no actual basis, but that's your problem, not mine.
Huh? There have certainly been Subsaharan scripts; that's not particularly controversial. If the claim is that many of these were influenced by the development of external scripts, that's not particularly cutting, since most scripts developed anywhere were so influenced.
There are recurrent tropes in much of rap, but that's not unique to rap as a verse form by any means, and the braggadocio about women, drugs, weapons, wealth in the context of oral verse is, frankly, ancient. The old Indo-European verse traditions we culturally exalt were no different in that regard.
I'm not in the least bit emotional. Biden certainly isn't my hero, but he is about to be inaugurated as president, instead of going to gitmo, your delusions to the contrary notwithstanding. In precisely the same way I have been correct about every single issue that you hopium addicts have disagreed with me on thus far (lawsuits, krakens, SCOTUS, Pence, etc.), I will yet again be correct on this one.
If Biden is sworn in on the 20th, will you admit that you were completely delusional? I'm happy to do so if I'm wrong, but, unlike hopium addicts, I have yet to be incorrect when describing what will happen.
These beliefs that Trump is somehow magically going to stay in office are just desperately sad, at this point.
They are both, in the literal sense, doctorates. An MD is a Medicinae Doctor; a JD is a Juris Doctor. Both are the expected terminal degrees in their fields even for academics and researchers, and, in the literal Latinate meaning of the term 'doctor', qualify their holders to teach medicine and law respectively - in contrast to, say, an MBA.
Can your Q theory generate actual testable predictions, that do not change over time, and which are capable of falsification?