1
dirtymikeandthebois 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ok we get it. It is terrible.

How about a strong statement against vaccine mandates.

1
dirtymikeandthebois 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm just in disbelief. I'm living proof that vaccinated people can spread. My entire unvaccinated family got it, without question, from my vaccinated in-law, who spread it to his wife.

Are they seriously trying to say they can contact it but not spread it 🤣🤣🤣🤣

1
dirtymikeandthebois 1 point ago +1 / -0

You guys don't get it. This is a loss.

Now the booster shot narrative doesn't have to be explained and they can focus on everyone just getting jabbed and being done with it.

1
dirtymikeandthebois 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm old enough to remember when our god king Steve Bannon was singing his praises during this whole election fiasco.

What an absolute whiff that was.

1
dirtymikeandthebois 1 point ago +1 / -0

If they were actually scared they'd be in their homes. End of story.

6
dirtymikeandthebois 6 points ago +6 / -0

This sounds exactly like a nurse I know. The narrative is now 100% about the ICU risk and nothing else.

2
dirtymikeandthebois 2 points ago +4 / -2

Give up on california.

Worry about the swing states that's all we need. Then we can deal with the shit later.

1
dirtymikeandthebois 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm confused... I live in America - is that not true of pretty much all women here? Actual women... not the blue hair shims.

1
dirtymikeandthebois 1 point ago +2 / -1

Californians have everything that's coming to them

2
dirtymikeandthebois 2 points ago +2 / -0

Which then gets me back to the question - why would they care about the vaccine - they should care about instituting a negative test requirement and/or proof of antibodies not that you got the fauci ouchie.

4
dirtymikeandthebois 4 points ago +4 / -0

Fired lol.

That should be his possible outcome. Like a serial killer being offered 20 years instead of the death penalty.

1
dirtymikeandthebois 1 point ago +1 / -0

Do y'all just accept anything you see on twitter as fact? The right can pull this crap as much as the left. There is SOME level of validity by having the blue check. Not in all cases, but you should certainly question this authenticity. Are these people in "real" ? Anyone know?

1
dirtymikeandthebois 1 point ago +1 / -0

Are they denying them or not offering?

To clarify - are they saying no to one person but yes to another within the same company? Or just not at all? Two very different things.

Absurd it needs to be used regardless...

2
dirtymikeandthebois 2 points ago +5 / -3

lol... "because fucking with law students is a bad idea".

Cringe.

6
dirtymikeandthebois 6 points ago +6 / -0

I have a hard time believing there is a staffing shortage. I just don't believe it. I have a family member that makes something like quadruple an hour right now what he normally makes AND a bonus upon completion of a shift. We're talking stupid good money to do the SAME job they signed up for 10 years ago. The only difference now is instead of being able to browse their phone for half their night shift they actually have to work the entire time.

0
dirtymikeandthebois 0 points ago +1 / -1

It's to the point now where if Wendy endorses someone, I want nothing to do with that person.

Who the fuck is Wendy to even endorse someone?

56
dirtymikeandthebois 56 points ago +56 / -0

My nurse practitioner family member has the audacity to tell me with a straight face it's because of masks and social distancing.

There is no statistician or accountant on the face of this planet that would accept this answer with a straight face, let alone your average day person with two cents of common sense.

view more: Next ›