1
djentropyhardcore 1 point ago +1 / -0

checked their website today...all the pride stuff is adult again, and no weird trans underwear besides adult tuck underwear from TomboyX (one item it seems)

I'd call that a win

1
djentropyhardcore 1 point ago +1 / -0

One can use drugs and not be an addict.

So you're against drug use in public spaces? Do the restaurants and bars you go to know you feel this way? Do you jump people on the street for drinking coffee, eating sugar, or smoking a cigarette? Real tough guy huh? Small dick, I assume? 3 to 4 inches, maybe?

Also, suck my balls, bitchtits.

1
djentropyhardcore 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nice wordplay and strawman, but when did I ever say people get along when they do drugs? Also, drug legalization is required to be a successful country. Prohibition of any type makes government too large.

8
djentropyhardcore 8 points ago +8 / -0

"I went to this mechanic and there's all these people trying to get their car fixed! What the hell?!"

3
djentropyhardcore 3 points ago +3 / -0

This reply seems to be evidence this is either paid propaganda or advertising. NOBODY talks like that.

2
djentropyhardcore 2 points ago +2 / -0

I refuse to believe these locked-reply threads aren't paid advertising.

1
djentropyhardcore 1 point ago +1 / -0

The Constitution is a document that spells out the limited things our government can do. There is nothing in the Constitution that gives government the power to ban inanimate objects. So yes, you can have anything you want in this country, and that's the way it was until the Progressive Era. Government is empowered to protect life, liberty, and property. Nothing we're talking about endangers any of those things.

Regarding Bud Light, I don't drink alcohol, and do not support transgenderism. Only poor White trash welfare queens drink Bud products anyway. At least drink Guinness if you're going to drink. As far as Twitter goes, I don't think there is anything I could do to stop them from banning conservatives, sadly.

You seem like a really unhappy person.

1
djentropyhardcore 1 point ago +1 / -0

Of course they should be legal...AND untaxed. I base my decision on the United States Constitution. Maybe you should read it.

-1
djentropyhardcore -1 points ago +1 / -2

"We disregard the Constitution all the time, so lets just keep doing it more!"

Why are you even here? You're a left-wing Harry Anslinger type. Shouldn't you be on TYT or something?

-1
djentropyhardcore -1 points ago +1 / -2

Shrooms don't cause problems. Ever. Also government has no place in the pharmaceutical industry. There is nothing in the Constitution that allows government of any level (federal, state, local) to ban inanimate objects, including chemicals, guns, or anything else.

You're just old and liberal. Probably haven't gotten laid in a while.

Drugs don't commit violence. People commit violence.

Edit: There is no such thing as "public safety". A free-market capitalist society makes no guarantees about risk. If you're so scared of chemicals that people have been using for thousands of years, then stay in your house like you do already.

0
djentropyhardcore 0 points ago +1 / -1

Who gives a fuck about some over the hill British communists that play guitar and hate Republicans?

Jeesuz you're a fucking clown.

0
djentropyhardcore 0 points ago +1 / -1

^^^^^I bet this dude hasn't been laid in decades.

0
djentropyhardcore 0 points ago +1 / -1

The same "they" that told you a fake virus from China was gonna kill you and you need a shot that will actually kill you? LMAO.

I don't want your welfare; I think you're thinking of someone else. Government has no place in the welfare industry.

You are a commie. You want government to enforce culture. That's what the Left does. And I'm certain I'm older than you, btw.

0
djentropyhardcore 0 points ago +1 / -1

This isn't China, bro. We don't use the government to regulate culture here.

view more: Next ›