1
dldeuce 1 point ago +1 / -0

Let's remember that the goal is to have a government that isn't for or against religion. If the government is for religion, let's be against that. If a government is against religion, let's be against that. If a politician wants to preach to me, I'm against that. If he wants to preach against a pro or anti religious government, I'm for that.

1
dldeuce 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's a common problem that people don't post the link. They're looking at it, copy. paste. Now we have something to discuss. Notice that this topic got zero discussion, and it should have. It's basically an admission by the WHO that the entire pandemic is a total scam.

2
dldeuce 2 points ago +2 / -0

https://www.who.int/news/item/14-12-2020-who-information-notice-for-ivd-users

This WHO notice is the scientific and political understatement of the century. They're admitting the PCR test is the whole basis for the global pandemic scam.

1
dldeuce 1 point ago +1 / -0

For example, the quote appears to come from this; https://principia-scientific.com/who-finally-admits-covid19-pcr-test-has-a-problem/

The quoted article is even more informative and interesting than the WHO information notice. The scale of the understatement by the WHO is really the big story.

1
dldeuce 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thank you. That link is actually very useful. Too bad the OP didn't post that along with a link to the quote so that we could all read and discuss.

1
dldeuce 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is old school political advice. It had limited affect on house reps and even less impact on senators. It's a new world now. They don't have to worry about elections. They don't care about telephone calls or emails. They don't have to even pretend to care about you.

9
dldeuce 9 points ago +10 / -1

4 years and no convictions. Don't get ahead of yourself.

1
dldeuce 1 point ago +1 / -0

nope. nothing from WHO and nothing about false positives. Like a lot of threads the link, if it ever existed would have been useful.

by mehname
5
dldeuce 5 points ago +5 / -0

You mean like Congress should read the doc, when they're so busy not reading the bills?

1
dldeuce 1 point ago +1 / -0

You.mean the ones that keep harassing us and throwing us out of their businesses because we won’t wear a mask? The restaurants that won’t walk us to their table past every other customer that aren’t wearing masks either?

2
dldeuce 2 points ago +2 / -0

You are so so right. I was in an expensive furniture store. We came in without masks and were immediately and loudly confronted from across the store. By a clerk that recognized us as regular customers. We said look, we’re good. Your store is completely empty. Argued a little, and then the owner piped in indignantly. ‘You do realize this is my store,” with his mask halfway down his face. I said well all the more reason not to be a complete prick and hypocrite to your customers. You do realize that it’s my money in my pocket? Then we left. Should have seen his face then! Priceless!

1
dldeuce 1 point ago +1 / -0

How many days do you think you might have to do all that before your $1M was worthless? ;)

2
dldeuce 2 points ago +2 / -0

And what good would a special prosecutor do anyway just a week and a half from when they count the votes? I don’t know what the plan is, but it’s not Sidney Powell. That’s a real mystery too since she has been running with the head of the snake in this whole thing. The Trump team dumped that story and Powell right after the press conference. If he’s waiting on some big bomb of a revelation that’s going to shock and awe the world, I sure don’t know why he’s waited so long.

3
dldeuce 3 points ago +3 / -0

At least it wasn't your son and daughters that did it!

1
dldeuce 1 point ago +1 / -0

That would be an interesting experiment.. I wonder how fast the US Government could deliver a wire transfer to every American for $1M dollars? Imagine the scenario where with no notice, we all get $1M deposited to our bank accounts at exactly the same time. What would you buy, and how fast could you spend it before it became worthless? Based upon what you bought, how long would it take you to starve?

2
dldeuce 2 points ago +2 / -0

Oh come on. It's free money! Free money I SAY! Give us all FREE MONEY! GIVE EVERYONE IN THE WORLD FREE MONEY! EVERYBODY COME RUNNING THE USA IS GIVING AWAY FREE MONEY. LET'S ALL GET SOME. GIVE US ALL SOME MORE FREE MONEY!

1
dldeuce 1 point ago +1 / -0

WTF are you talking about, stimulus? Is that like shovel ready jobs? The only thing they're stimulating is inflation, debt, economic downturn, poverty, mass corruption and loss of freedom for generations to come.

1
dldeuce 1 point ago +1 / -0

What do you mean? They did vote on it, which told us everything we needed to know. We don't need the government to print fake fiat money and "give" it to us, saddling generations to come with fake debt. Don't be fooled. They're not proposing to give us anything. They're proposing to impoverish us all for generations to come.

0
dldeuce 0 points ago +1 / -1

Don't be a fool. This isn't your own money that they would potentially be giving back to you. That's called a spending cut and tax cut. In other words, being responsible and keeping their hands out of your wallet in the first place. That's never going to happen.

This is a tax increase. They print worthless fake, free money, and give that to you and everyone else in God's green earth, which necessarily deflates not only your "free money" but all our current assets, and future earnings. Then they raise your taxes. They're not giving you money, they're impoverishing generations of Americans and stealing our freedoms forever.

2
dldeuce 2 points ago +2 / -0

In other words, Trump vetoed it, saving us all, and it's still vetoed. In other words, Congress has failed to do anything, once again giving us all a perfect illustration of why that's a good thing.

5
dldeuce 5 points ago +5 / -0

It means they put us all in debt for over 700B to everyone in the world but Americans and then gave much less than 200B of our grandchildren's money to us.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›