Instead of simply keeping the truth to myself, or maybe making one or two "anonymous posts" leaking the truth but not proving it at all, I wrote a book that examines the facts and proves every single aspect of the true story beyond a doubt. Not only do I want to tell the story, I want people to know for an absolute fact that this account is the truth so that they can understand the implications.
This is ten times more detailed than the "whistleblower account" the other day and unlike his information I prove and back up everything I present.
Here are the links.
https://www.kobo.com/us/en/ebook/his-name-was-seth-rich
Here it is, the culmination of months of research, countless all nighters, meticulous analysis of facts to draw conclusions, and corroboration/refutation of potential theories by FACTUALLY BASED LOGICAL DEDUCTION. I found that combing through everything related to Seth's death and extracting every piece of information that could be 100% verified led to a solid collection of verifiable facts. After finishing this I would see what theories allow all of the individually verified facts to remain true? Which theories help account for surprising truths? For example, if Seth was Assange's source, and Assange told someone that Seth was his source, and I can be 100% sure both of these are truths, the theory that KimDotCom was the one who gave Assange the emails becomes very unlikely. This method was used until I believed I had a solid grasp of what really happened, from the leaks to the dealt to the cover up.
I then reached out to a source who was in the room, such a reliable source that the MSM calls him the "shadowy rich businessman behind Fox's irresponsible Seth Rich reporting." Since I had such a solid grasp of the case he took a liking to me, and he essentially told me everything he knew.
The book is my presentation of the evidence and my ultimate conclusions about what happened. It is structured in such a way that a complete normie would walk away after reading it all feeling like an expert on the subject of Russiagate and Seth RIch... they would also have no doubts that Seth Rich was the DNC leak source and was murdered because of it, and that the effort to deny this was politically motivated and dishonest. I have had two lefties who think I'm a tinfoil hat wearing loon read this and this was the end result both times. The facts are hard to get away from here.
I hope that this catches on not because I care about money, I want this information to get out there and Seth's story to be told.
I also have an amazon link here...
Please give it a read, if anyone here wants a free copy PM me. This information needs to get out there. This is the first time Seth's story is being told with integrity and with honesty.
I much preferred having Bonginos publisher stamp this, but that ship sailed. I won't let this slowly die because I couldn't find the dream publisher.
I also posted it on kindle, nook, and some other sites.
I wrote a book about Seth Rich but Biden's "win" fucked me. I had two publishers change their mind about publishing it because of "the direction the country is going." I know it's bulllshit but right now I just want to get this information out there and to the people. Does anyone have any advice on how to go about self publishing? Should I just use kindle? Any pitfalls to watch out for? Any guidance would be appreciated. The last few times I posted about the book people told me to self publish.
We just witnessed blatant fraud of a US election and the news denies what anyone can see with minimal effort. Yet half of the country believes the bullshit....
We saw the SCOTUS betray the constitution and allow the Republic to be taken over by Chinese subversion.
We saw the VP pull a movie like last second backstab, complete with a theatrical performance from him.
We saw politicians say they would object, but instead open the doors to a protest and use them as an excuse to run and hide... then not object? As if the protest changed the fraudulent election process?
We have seen just how dirty, corrupt, and UBIQUITOUS the swamp is. Even those we believed to be our champions where members of the Order... or under their control.
It's worse than a third world nation.
We are not free. We aren't even close. I've realized our goverment is a communistic, insufferable cancer that forces itself to play act like an adversarial and diverse system with checks and balances, law and order, and equal protection. These are fundamental illusions that must be kept up at all times, because then we scratch our heads and assume their dumb weak or hapless.
I'm just saying all this to say, they've already taken over our system from top to bottom. Their is only two ways this can go.
Trump and a small group of loyalist military clean house and absolutely leave no stone unturned, leading to what would essentially be a reboot of our system and a total cleansing of the order.
Or....
They kill or lock up Trump and we go back to the old ways, make believe red blue where it's really all NWO. They wouldn't need to cheat every election, it usually doesn't matter what side wins. They would portray the swamp screwing us a "unity," and the American people will gradually start to oppose them as an armed and organized force.
Either way we are in for a hot conflict with serious implications and previously unimaginable occurrences.... like the blackmail getting released that will be hard for many to accept.
God why did we not listen to Bill Cooper.
I can't believe I'm being taken seriously by this big of a publisher, they're the same guys who publish another famous pedes books exposing Russiagate. I have an offer from the publisher who published Sidney Powells book, but they cost money that I can't afford. These guys would not require a cost.
I don't ask for you to believe me I just ask for your prayers and positive thoughts.
Let's expose the fucks who killed Seth.
Background: the 2004 Ukrainian Presidential elections were between Yanukovych and Yushchenko. So, Ukraine is essentially the elite's dumpster slut and lawless playground, they use her for whatever the fuck they want and do whatever the fuck they want there. There are two "dudes" (global power structures) who both want her to themselves, and for totally different (but somewhat similar) reasons, Russia and the western world's globalists' cabal, the NWO (corrupt US interests and the globalists at the EU and UN). Russia wanted to use Ukraine as a buffer against NWO aggression and fuckery, and also actually does care about the people, many of whom they feel are Russian citizens (and they feel they are Russian too). The NWO wants it to have a lawless playground to further fuckery and to get closer to Putin and Russian, to exert their fuckery. Remember the impeachment hoax and how much of it had to do with Ukrainian ambassadors and money and spooks? Ya, that kind of fuckery is what comes from owning a country. They also wanted to rape the Ukrainian people of all wealth, resources, and self determination. I wish I was being hyperbolic.
In the election Yanukovych was considered the "Russian puppet" and Yushchenko... well here is all you need to know about Yuschenko.
- "U.S. Senators John McCain and Hillary Clinton jointly wrote a letter nominating Victor Yushchenko along with Georgian President Mikheil Saakashvili for the Nobel Peace Prize. The nomination was unsuccessful."
Yushchenko was the NWO puppet, but for real for real. Like, Biden level NWO cuck.
O ya, want to know the name of one of Yanukovych's most trusted campaign staffers? Paul Manafort. Yes, THAT Paul Manafort.
So how did the election go...
Look at this from Wikipedia.
- "Following the November 21 run-off ballot, Ukraine's electoral commission declared Prime Minister Viktor Yanukovych the winner with 49.42% of the vote, with Viktor Yushchenko receiving 46.69% of the ballots cast."
Ok, so NWO's boy lost. Wait for it...
- "Observers for the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) said the run-off vote "did not meet international standards" and U.S. senior election observer, Senator Richard Lugar, called it a "concerted and forceful program of election day fraud".
You believe that shit? The same frauds saying no evidence were the ones clamoring against fraud to get their stooge in in Ukraine. What did they cite as evidence? .....
- "Between the two rounds of the election, dramatic increases in turnout were recorded in Yanukovych-supporting regions, while Yushchenko-supporting regions recorded the same turnout or lower than recorded in the first round. This effect was most marked in eastern Ukraine and especially in Yanukovych's stronghold of Donetsk Oblast, where a turnout of 98.5% was reportedly claimed—more than 40% up from the first round.[2][3] In some districts, turnout was recorded to be more than 100% than the previous ballot, with one district reported by observers to have recorded a 127% turnout.[2][3] According to election observers and post-election investigations, pro-Yanukovych activists traveled around the country and voted many times as absentees.[2][3] Some groups dependent on government assistance, such as students, hospital patients and prisoners, were told to vote for the government candidate. Many other alleged irregularities were reported, including ballot stuffing, intimidation at voting booths and huge numbers of new voters appearing on the electoral rolls—in Donetsk alone, half a million more voters were registered for the runoff election. Yanukovych won all but one of the regions where significant increases in turnout were noted. It was later determined by the Ukrainian Supreme Court that this was in fact due to widespread falsification of the results"
Huh.
Sounds a lot like what happened here doesn't it? They literally cited every concern that they're dismissing now. Well, what happened?
Ukraine's Supreme Court decided they needed another election. The liberal press has recently started calling it a "second round" through retroactive edits, but it wasn't. It was a whole new election done because of allegations of fraud. Ordered by their SC. Huh. If Ukraine's Supreme Court can decide this is necessary, why the hell can't ours? (they can)
Anyway, the second election happened and the NWO's boy won.
- "The final results of the rerun ballot recorded Viktor Yushchenko receiving 52.00% of the votes, with Viktor Yanukovych on 44.19% which represented a change in the vote by +5.39% to Yushchenko and -5.27% from Yanukovych. Viktor Yanukovych conceded defeat on December 31, 2004 and subsequently resigned as Ukraine's Prime Minister the same day. Despite Yushchenko's victory in the second round of voting, the regional voting patterns remained largely unchanged between each round, with many southern and eastern provinces supporting Yanukovych, with the west and central regions favoring Yushchenko. Ukraine's supreme court rejected an appeal lodged by Viktor Yanukovych against the electoral commission's conduct of the election on January 6.
Alrighty, the NWO's got the "Russian puppet" out of legal options, what did he choose to do? Stand and fight and rally the troops? Or roll over and let his country get stolen....
- "On January 10 the Ukrainian Electoral Commission officially declared Viktor Yushchenko the winner and on January 11 published the final election results,[19] clearing the way for Yushchenko to be inaugurated as Ukraine's third President. The official ceremonies took place on Sunday, January 23 at about noon, when Yushchenko undertook the constitutional oath was sworn in as President. In November 2009 Yanukovych stated that although his victory in the elections was "taken away" he gave up this victory in order to avoid bloodshed. "I didn't want mothers to lose their children and wives their husbands. I didn't want dead bodies from Kyiv to flow down the Dnipro. I didn't want to assume power through bloodshed."
Hopefully this will show what happens when you yield to these fuckers. This is how Ukraine became what it is today, how they were able to use it for the Impeachment scam, how they all had their kids on the gas companies, how they feed us fake evidence against the NWO's enemies, and what happened to the man they called a Russian stooge? Yanukovych was subsequently run out of the country after being accused of all sorts of crazy things, mainly Russian puppet related, but including making illegal payments to Paul Manafort through the fraudulent little black book, dubbed "the Black Ledger". This book was fraudulent, as in a Deep State forgery, but it didn't matter. It was found inside the ex president's vault, was the only thing there, and supposedly had survived a fire with no burn damage. Yet this little fake book is actually what allowed them to go after Manafort and helped them bolster their witch hunt against Trump. The Witch Hunt would have never gotten off the ground if it weren't for Manafort and the Black Ledger.
See, these things aren't actually two separate but similar events, they're all the same event. It's just being played out over decades so no one is making the connections.
They aren't just using the same playbook against Trump, they're using the same fucking fake evidence in BOTH examples of men they are claiming were Russian stooges. There were fucked up fraudulent elections dealing with BOTH men, only this time they're pulling a 180 and denying all the red flags that they screamed about in Ukraine.
Let me remind you that after they put this stooge in Ukraine was fucked by the NWO for years to come and was a lawless shithole, and Bidens, Pelosis, Romneys, and more, sent their kids their to suck back up our tax payer dollars that they were sending there by sitting them on boards they weren't qualified to be on.
If Trump doesn't win this we will literally be at the whims of the SAME NWO fucks who stole Ukraine and raped it for their own benefit, and Trump will be persecuted just like the last "Russian Puppet" was.
Now, there is a lot of uncertainty and it seems that Yanukovych wasn't so innocent, but I can't say for sure because they lie about everything, even physical evidence was fake. Plus, Russia was actually a much better influence to have because they helped keep out the wolves that run our deep state and actually cared about Ukrainian people.
Anyway, I just thought I would point this out. It's been my goal to start helping pedes see the big picture of this all. This is my first post trying to do so. If it gets any traction I will keep making them until it's all laid bare.
Background, it was Yanukovych vs Yushchenko. Ukrain is essentially the elite's dumpster slut, they use her for whatever the fuck they want. Their are two dudes who both her to themselves, Russia and the NWO West (corrupt US interests and the globalists at the EU).
Yanukovych was considered the Russian puppet and Yushchenko... well here is all you need to know about Yuschenko.
"U.S. Senators John McCain and Hillary Clinton jointly wrote a letter nominating Victor Yushchenko along with Georgian President Mikheil Saakashvili for the Nobel Peace Prize. The nomination was unsuccessful."
So the election...
Look at this from Wikipedia.
- "Following the November 21 run-off ballot, Ukraine's electoral commission declared Prime Minister Viktor Yanukovych the winner with 49.42% of the vote, with Viktor Yushchenko receiving 46.69% of the ballots cast."
Ok, so NWO's boy lost. Wait for it...
- "Observers for the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) said the run-off vote "did not meet international standards" and U.S. senior election observer, Senator Richard Lugar, called it a "concerted and forceful program of election day fraud".
You believe that shit? The same frauds saying no evidence were the ones clamoring against fraud to get their stooge in in Ukraine. What did they cite as evidence? .....
- "Between the two rounds of the election, dramatic increases in turnout were recorded in Yanukovych-supporting regions, while Yushchenko-supporting regions recorded the same turnout or lower than recorded in the first round. This effect was most marked in eastern Ukraine and especially in Yanukovych's stronghold of Donetsk Oblast, where a turnout of 98.5% was reportedly claimed—more than 40% up from the first round.[2][3] In some districts, turnout was recorded to be more than 100% than the previous ballot, with one district reported by observers to have recorded a 127% turnout.[2][3] According to election observers and post-election investigations, pro-Yanukovych activists traveled around the country and voted many times as absentees.[2][3] Some groups dependent on government assistance, such as students, hospital patients and prisoners, were told to vote for the government candidate.[7] ** Many other alleged irregularities were reported, including ballot stuffing, intimidation at voting booths and huge numbers of new voters appearing on the electoral rolls—in Donetsk alone, half a million more voters were registered for the runoff election.** Yanukovych won all but one of the regions where significant increases in turnout were noted. It was later determined by the Ukrainian Supreme Court that this was in fact due to widespread falsification of the results"
Huh.
Sounds a lot like what happened here doesn't it? They literally cited every concern that they're dismissing now. Well, what happened?
Ukraine's Supreme Court decided they needed another election. The liberal press has recently started calling it a "second round" through retroactive edits, but it wasn't. It was a whole new election done because of allegations of fraud. Ordered by their SC. Huh. If Ukraine's Supreme Court can decide this is necessary, why the hell can't ours? (they can)
Anyway, the second election happened and the NWO's boy won.
"The final results of the rerun ballot recorded Viktor Yushchenko receiving 52.00% of the votes, with Viktor Yanukovych on 44.19% which represented a change in the vote by +5.39% to Yushchenko and -5.27% from Yanukovych.
Viktor Yanukovych conceded defeat on December 31, 2004 and subsequently resigned as Ukraine's Prime Minister the same day. Despite Yushchenko's victory in the second round of voting, the regional voting patterns remained largely unchanged between each round, with many southern and eastern provinces supporting Yanukovych, with the west and central regions favoring Yushchenko.
Ukraine's supreme court rejected an appeal lodged by Viktor Yanukovych against the electoral commission's conduct of the election on January 6.
On January 10 the Ukrainian Electoral Commission officially declared Viktor Yushchenko the winner and on January 11 published the final election results,[19] clearing the way for Yushchenko to be inaugurated as Ukraine's third President. The official ceremonies took place on Sunday, January 23 at about noon, when Yushchenko undertook the constitutional oath was sworn in as President.
In November 2009 Yanukovych stated that although his victory in the elections was "taken away" he gave up this victory in order to avoid bloodshed. "I didn't want mothers to lose their children and wives their husbands. I didn't want dead bodies from Kyiv to flow down the Dnipro. I didn't want to assume power through bloodshed."[20]
Seriously. Every thread is being dragged down with your pessimism and despair. "THERES LITERALLY NO PATH NOW"
Do you know how many times I have heard that? We are still fighting. Pennsylvania doesn't send electors? Damning huh, the end is here....
Except it's not. We still have several court cases that could get to SCOTUS and I believe that's an automatic win if it does.
THEY CERTIFIED, NOOOOO!!!
They have certified states and found issues before, guess what, they sent a new certification with the correct result.
"This guy/this girl/this faggot betrayed us, pack it up!"
We are going to be dealing with a lot of this unfortunately. They are putting all their chips on this coup, it will not be easy. There is going to be setbacks. The strategy will change. We are going to feel good and other times be pissed.
That's fine, if you can keep in perspective. Everytime something negative happens it is the end of everything and everytime something good happens Biden is going to jail.
Anyway, my point is that if you can't take it in stride and participate without attacking those of us who aren't falling to pieces, if you cant post without trying to tell people that it's over because of whatever setback, maybe just log off and brood by yourself?
We're trying to do something here, we need to mobilize calls and get important information and data to the right people, we can not being having these efforts hindered by poaters who have the emotional strength of young children.
*** FOR THE RECORD ****
A path ..... one of many...
-
Penn: Scotus hears case and uses BUSH V GORE equal protection to remove votes that were inventoried as problematic. 1,50K random votes removed from the 3 counties that had issues (yes this is a legitimate possibility), recount shows trump wins.
-
WI :
Contested ballots from recount are enough to flip
-NV : lawsuit for dead and out of state votes succeeds
' GA : Powell's lawsuit succeeds in getting illegible votes tossed (I think it was something simple like the amount of ballots showing a change of address to out of state is enough to give it to trump) gives state to Trump after Certified for Biden. GA recertified with correct results and this cert. Is accepted instead of first
AZ gets cucked
MI : gets cucked
Result: we win
Literally hundreds of these scenarios, so no, one event here is not going to end everything or win it all. Just fucking breath and help us fight this.
Go around offering lefties a free video game if they guess the results of a coin flip simulator that is run 1,000,000 times. Tell them a graph will update them in real time as it is being run. Use the election night graphs that show the crazy Biden jump but play it back real time.
Watch as chaos breaks as lefties flip and contest the results and say it's impossible to get a jump like that. Argue it's totally possible. Watch them shake. After they've lost it long enough. .
Drop bomb that they're the election results.
Watch heads explode.
Go around offering lefties a free video game if they guess the results of a coin flip simulator that is run 1,000,000 times. Tell them a graph will update them in real time as it is being run. Use the election night graphs that show the crazy Biden jump but play it back real time.
Watch as chaos breaks as lefties flip and contest the results and say it's impossible to get a jump like that. Argue it's totally possible. Watch them shake. After they've lost it long enough. .
Drop bomb that they're the election results.
Watch heads explode.
These boys risked everything to get the truth out to the American people. Brave people are the biggest threat to totalitarian subversion.
Seth Rich paid the ultimate price and saved us from Clinton/deep state takeover.
Chinese Patriots may have just saved us from China Joe.
If everyone who has information damaging to the deep state acted this fearlessly they'd be beaten in a few weeks. They control us through fear.
Ok, simple as fuck right? It's essentially creating one sticky, writing the rules, and tallying the results people send in, all that in exchange for potentially handing Trump the win.
So we hold a contest... overall it is about how many undecided voters you can get to commit to voting for Trump? Whoever manages the most wins... but there's a catch.
Swing states are weighted and non registered voters are weighted. Convinced an old cousin who loves in Ohip to vote Trump? That's 2. Called an old friend from school who's wife is a SJw but who was always cool himself? 2 points. Also if someone planned not to vote, and you get them on board for trump, well if you send you a picture of the registration you talked them into getting that's also counts as 2.
Do this in a swing state? That's a 3 x value. I mean think about it, it's a Trump vote in the a state that is going to come.down to 10,000-50,000 voters, and it's one that no one accounted for.
Seriously, it is so simple yet it could legitimately be what makes the difference between having Biden or Trump as the next POTUS. It would be between now and Nov. 4th. You could give the winner a special flair or something, it doesnt matter. I'd chip in to get a cool prize though, like a signed Trump shirt or something... I'd give them the first public copy of my book? Anything man we just need to get this moving now. It is just about giving people a reason and a way to contribute, they'll do it regardless of whether anyone wins anythitng significant or not. But it wouldn't hurt to have something cool! The mods would have to keep a sticky up the entire time until Trump wins with all the information and were we can all share what worked, what didn't, etc. It would just give us an excuse to do the work we should be doing. We could easily set this up, it would cost nothing, and it could potentially win the election.
Something like...
"ANNOUNCMENT: The Donald.win's 2020 red pill dispensing competition commences today and will last until Nov. 4th... how many undecided voters can you convince to vote for Trump? We all know 10-15 people easy who could potentially be convicted to vote for Trump, but how many of us are making sure they do? Well today that changes, because whichever pede gets the most undecided voters to verbally commit to Trump before the election will win _____". (Idk, a signed Trump T shirt or something.) Second place gets a _____, third a ______, and..."
They could be people members know personally or they could be from the list of potential voters that the campaign puts out, we could link Army for Trump or whatever the website is right on the sticky.
We could make a real difference here. How many people come to this site a day? People who are uniquely qaulitfied to shit down liberal fake news concerns... red pill experts talking people out of the lifes they've been told and explaining what Trump is REALLY ABOUT would be massive. Imagine if each person got 5-10 people to vote for Trump... It could be enough to determine a close election. Hell, it could be enough to determine a blow out if the votes are in the right place (which they will be given the weighting system).
I messaged the mods but still haven't heard back. if others chime in to say that it's a great idea they're more likely to do it. If not I'll fucking put it on myself and pray for a sticky lol.
We hold a contest... how many undecided voters can you get to commit to voting for Trump?? Whoever manages the most wins.
Seriously, it is so simple yet it could legitimately be what makes the difference between having Biden or Trump as the next POTUS. It would be between now and Nov. 4th. You could give the winner a special flair or something, it doesnt matter. I'd chip in to get a cool prize though, like a signed Trump shirt or something. It is just about giving people a reason and a way to contribute, they'll do it regardless of whether anyone wins anythitng or not. But it wouldn't hurt to have something cool! The mods would have to keep a sticky up the entire time until Trump wins with all the information and were we can all share what worked, what didn't, etc. It would just give us an excuse to do the work we should be doing. We could easily set this up, it would cost nothing, and it could potentially win the election.
Just something like...
"ANNOUNCMENT: The Donald.win's 2020 red pill dispensing competition commences today and will last until Nov. 4th... how many undecided voters can you convince to vote for Trump? We all know 10-15 people easy who could potentially be convicted to vote for Trump, but how many of us are making sure they do? Well today that changes, because whichever pede gets the most undecided voters to verbally commit to Trump before the election will win _____". (Idk, a signed Trump T shirt or something.) Second place gets a _____, third a ______, and..."
You get it. But we could have bonus points for certain scenarios. If you can get someone who wasn't even registered to register and commit to Trump, that counts as two. If they are and undecided voting in a swing state, that's 2 also.
If it's a swing state and they werent registered until you got them registered and pledged to vote trump? That's 3.
They could be people we know personally or they could be from the list of potential voters that the campaign puts out, we could link Army for Trump or whatever the website is right on the sticky.
We could make a real difference here. How many people come to this site a day? Now imagine if each person got 5-10 people to vote for Trump... It could be enough to tup a close election. Now since we will be targeting swing states bc of the bonus.. this could literally change the election outcome and that's not hyperbole.
I messaged the mods but if others chime in saying it's a great idea they're more likely to do it.
Here is a video I made that proves Seth was the source of the DNC email leak.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/FOPAbcZ97CB1/
I made this originally about a year ago... maybe? I updated it a few times but it was a long time ago when i first put these pieces together.
It is a summary of the basic outline of facts that I put together and analyzed and prove beyond any real doubt that Seth Rich was the DNC email source.
I have since expanded upon this information in an incredible way. I have found so much more corroboration for each point, I have discovered the name of Hersh's source, I've made contact with a high level source in the case who told me everything, and I have put this all into a book that is being reviewed by a publisher.
I know people will want everything else, but you will have access it to it soon enough. I promise. I have learned that this video is 100% true and hits the nail on the head though, so I just wanted to share it for those who might be unconvinced or think it's all a "conspiracy theory."
I am willing to answer any questions, but please watch the video first. I hate when people come and attack me or the idea that Seth was behind the leaks and bring up shit that is addressed specifically in the video.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=trtAahlvXA8&list=PL4_kOqWL8scVicGEabJg2HcwDXtj6LgOH&index=21
This is a meticulously researched and well crafted expose of the NWO that got Bill Cooper killed. It is a lot of information, I promise it's worth it.
Warning, this is a long post. It has lot of intricacies and the DNCs strategy was not easy to come up with a counter. After several days of trying to come up with a solution to stop what we can see coming, I think I've got it.
I believe I have come up with a way to stop the left wing mail-in scheme. I think that in an election that is fair and conducted normally, Trump wins in a landslide electorally. However I think that in this election that is coming up Biden has the upper hand because they've figured out how to steal the election without the need for any outright fraud.
As they point out, there really hasn't been much widespread fraud in our national elections. Now this isn't because Dems wouldn't do it, their primaries are riddled with fraud, but they have been unable to really carry that over to national votes.
The fact that they didn't manage to steal the election with fraud in 2016, after they had rigged the primaries and I was sure they would, I started thinking that maybe it's either harder than we think to pull off. Maybe it's too large a risk.
But if they're not pushing mail in to make things easier for fraud then why is that their clear plan forward? The advantage Trump has over Biden is not having more people who plan to be voters for him. there are probably more Democrats than Trump voters if we are being realistic, propaganda is effective.
No, his advantage is largely due to the tremendous gap in enthusiasm between Trump and Biden voters. Very few people are excited to vote for Joe and Kamala, but they would if it came down to it purely because they hate trump. We know what these voters usually do on election day, and a good portion of them stay home. They would have voted Biden, but they're not going to make an effort or put in any amount of work to do so. This could realistically be about 30% of people (who tell polls they would vote for Biden) who end up just staying home. These candidates are really that unappealing and unpopular with the left. Just for an idea of what this could mean in terms of real outcomes... Let's say there is a 55-45 split, 55 for Biden and 45 for Trump. Well, a 30% stay home rate would bring Biden down down to 38.5%.
On the flip side, most Trump voters will do anything to vote for him, they are tremendously enthusiastic and excited. At most around 5% of people who claim they're Trump voters in polls might stay home on election day. If we go off the assumed 55-45 biden trump split, this would bring Trump to 42.5%. We would go from 55-45 favoring Biden when it comes purely to people's preference, but there is a 38-43 split in favor of Trump when it comes to people's willingness to actually drive to a poll, standing in line, and voting for him. A 38-42 type of advantage for Trump and we would see an electoral landslide as a result.
By sending ballots to every single voter that is registered this will remove any need for effort to be put forth to vote. This would make it so that the 30% of democratic voters who would have stayed home will probably end up voting for Biden. It was brought to them with no effort in the same way polling company that calls them at home is, and we would probably see similar results.
a 38-43 trump landslide win flipped to a 55-45 Biden advantage just by removing the the need to actually do something to vote for a candidate.
They would do this all without the need for even one single fraudulent vote. If you also think about how many black city voters would be added in red states, this spells trouble. Blacks are one of the communities least enthusiastic about voting for a biden harris ticket, but many of them still would pick them over Trump if they could do so without having to make an effort. As a result of this alone could see Red States go blue that would never have a chance otherwise. Florida. Indiana. Ohio.
As a terrifying example, Trump trounced Hillary in Indiana and it wasn't close, he won 1,557,286 votes (57%) to her 1,033,266 (37%). The difference in this is over half a million votes. In fact Clinton only won 4 counties, monroe, marion, lake, and st joseph. But if just these 4 counties had managed 100 voter turnout from both democrat and republic registered voters,,similar to what we might expect with a mail in, and if each county retained the same percent of votes for Republican and the same percent for Democrats this would have resulted in Clinton beating Trump by a margin of 1,637,368 votes to 1,433,447 votes. That's a terrifying realization. This is in a state he won handily. In states that he won by much smaller margin it would only take a 5% increase in dem turnout to change the outcome. The point? The problem Trump is facing if they are able to negate the effect of the enthusiasm gap is compounded by the fact that higher population centers counties almost always have a higher percentage of democrat voters as well.
Put simply, a mail in vote would turn what should be a Trump landslide into a potential disaster and probably into a Biden victory. We are in real trouble with the scenario the Dems have set up going into the election.
I think our approach so far has been off the mark and ineffective.
Complaining does nothing, although I agree with what Trump has said, it will not change what's coming.
We need to find a way to stop the kind of mail in voting that features ballots being sent out indescrementntly.
We need to make sure people don't get ballots without first taking the time to go through the process of submitting a written request for that ballot.
If we can just ensure this step we're golden, the enthusiasm gap is back in play.
I recommend that Trump says something like,
"ok, fine. We can do mail in. However, it needs to be universal and consistent from state to state. We will set up a federal mail in system, but there will be some rules that every state will need to follow in order to ensure it is both safe and secure.
Rule 1. Ballots are only shipped to people who go online and fill out a form to apply for one. have them at "election2020.gov"
"We need to ensure that ballots are going to people who are still alive, living at the same address, and to make sure we do not have dogs and cats getting ballots. Clearly we can not just email them to every registered voter, this has led to chaos. We can ensure that everyone who wants a ballot is able to get one, however. This will be done through an easy and clear process that will be the same for every state.
They would just need to answer a few simple questions such as "what is your current address," name, age, etc, and once this was completed a ballot would be sent to the voter through the mail. They would then notify the election website that they had received the ballot, and the system would make sure no one else could use the same name and address to obtain another ballot.
There will be no mass mailing of ballots to all registered voters or the mass mailing of applications for ballots. The application process will be announced on TV, through the federal government, online, etc so that it is well known to all Americans. No applications or Ballots are allowed to be sent to someone who did not first request them. Period This is the crux of this entire idea.
People would still have the option to vote in public if they so chose.
The ballots can not be picked up by anyone other than an officially designated mail carrier assigned exclusively to the role of picking up votes that day.
Each vote collector would be accompanied by one or two independent election observers.. both the observer and carrier would be required to wear bodycams that would be publicly broadcasting their feeds online so that citizens could monitor every step of the process. If at any time all cameras went off the truck would be stopped and law enforcement would follow up with the situation to ensure that there was no fraud occurring. Cameras could also be set up in the cars and at election counting locations so that every step was done in the public eye. After each route ballots are immediately brought to the counting location and dropped off. The route is then repeated through out the day.
The votes would all be collected on November 3rd. Not after. Not before, (unless you ask for an absentee ballots. They would be different.) Polls end with one final round by the post carrier who had been designated to pick up votes, the last round would start at 9 PM (or whenever). After that final round is over, no more ballots are to be accepted from any source (outside of absentee ballots if that's how they already work), no arguments.
Voters would have options of several drop off boxes to choose from for a drop off location for their ballot. There would be specifically designated election drop off boxes that would be announced weeks before the election and marked as such in order to avoid confusion. They would have a postal worker and election observer make sure only ballots were put in the drop boxes.As the vote collector would be making several rounds throughout the day those concerned with people stealing ballots could wait for the person to come by before dropping their ballot in the box.
They could also give people the option of using their own mailbox with a raised flag.
8 The envelope sent with a ballot would be federally designed to ensure there was no way of determining who the vote was for without opening it. No serial numbers with an R or.a D on the OUTSIDE of the ballots. No see through paper or red dots on Republican ballots.
Each 5th or 10th, or 100th could potentially be tagged with a GPS device to make sure ballots do not wind up anywhere but the drop off boxes, the trucks, or the counting locations.location
There are designated vote counting locations where the special vote collectors would take them directly. The ballots would be fed into these machines, which would be responsible for unsealing them and reading the results. These facilities could also be publicly broadcast so people could keep an eye on things. Once a Cote I successfully counted the account used to request the ballot and sign off that arrived will be updated to show that it had been counted.
Introduce it like it's a peace offering to the democrats. "We know you have wanted mail in voting, we have decided to work with you on this issue by creating a proposal that would create a nationwide mail in voting system. This way we can ensure that American's can vote from the safety of their homes and also retain confidence in the election outcome."
If they refuse to sign a nationwide mail in system that follows the rules outlined, make it a voluntary service that would be provided to states that ask to be a part of it.
This would create a pretty clear public image issue for those states that would turn it down. Democrats have been demanding a vote by mail system for months, even withholding coronavirus relief until it was added, and here Trump is agreeing to set up a system. The left leaning states would look ridiculous turning it down, and would make people see that this mail in issue has never been about public safety.
Also, their plan to cause chaos using poorly thought out mail in policies and by allowing ballot harvesting will backfire. The plan is to blame Trump and claim that he caused the chaos by defunding the post office in order to suppress voters. How absurd would they look claiming this after they had turned federal assistance? They would look ridiculous blaming Trump after he had offered them an out, especially if every state that had accepted the federal system managed to pull off a smooth election and was able to post clear results on election night.
Also, if it is voluntary, most Republican states will sign up and be happy to accept the help and guidance, preventing the cities from becoming overrepresented through the mass mail scenario currently planned by dems. The blue states can do whatever they do as they're mostly decided anyway, and there is only so much damage that can be done. The swing states will have to be fought for, but this will at least give state leaders and easy out when they're being pressured to implement mail in. They can agree while also keeping republicans happy because they will trust the implementation.
I truly believe that this is our only hope of defeating the democrats plans for mail in voting. Like it or not it will be a large part of this election, let's throw a wrench in their plans and make sure that it's able to be carried out without inflating their turnout and without risk for chaos and to question Trump's legitimacy for another 4 years.
This needs to be started put into action yesterday, and if all efforts are out towards this there's no reason we couldn't pull it off.
Signing up would also result in the federal government paying for the infrastructure and the operations, saving the states that agreed money.
Warning, this is a long post. It has lot of intricacies and the DNCs strategy was not easy to come up with a counter. After several days of trying to come up with a solution to stop what we can see coming, I think I've got it.
I believe I have come up with a way to stop the left wing mail-in scheme. I think that in an election that is fair and conducted normally, Trump wins in a landslide electorally. However I think that in this election that is coming up Biden has the upper hand because they've figured out how to steal the election without the need for any outright fraud.
As they point out, there really hasn't been much widespread fraud in our national elections. Now this isn't because Dems wouldn't do it, their primaries are riddled with fraud, but they have been unable to really carry that over to national votes.
The fact that they didn't manage to steal the election with fraud in 2016, after they had rigged the primaries and I was sure they would, I started thinking that maybe it's either harder than we think to pull off. Maybe it's too large a risk.
But if they're not pushing mail in to make things easier for fraud then why is that their clear plan forward? The advantage Trump has over Biden is not having more people who plan to be voters for him. there are probably more Democrats than Trump voters if we are being realistic, propaganda is effective.
No, his advantage is largely due to the tremendous gap in enthusiasm between Trump and Biden voters. Very few people are excited to vote for Joe and Kamala, but they would if it came down to it purely because they hate trump. We know what these voters usually do on election day, and a good portion of them stay home. They would have voted Biden, but they're not going to make an effort or put in any amount of work to do so. This could realistically be about 30% of people (who tell polls they would vote for Biden) who end up just staying home. These candidates are really that unappealing and unpopular with the left. Just for an idea of what this could mean in terms of real outcomes... Let's say there is a 55-45 split, 55 for Biden and 45 for Trump. Well, a 30% stay home rate would bring Biden down down to 38.5%.
On the flip side, most Trump voters will do anything to vote for him, they are tremendously enthusiastic and excited. At most around 5% of people who claim they're Trump voters in polls might stay home on election day. If we go off the assumed 55-45 biden trump split, this would bring Trump to 42.5%. We would go from 55-45 favoring Biden when it comes purely to people's preference, but there is a 38-43 split in favor of Trump when it comes to people's willingness to actually drive to a poll, standing in line, and voting for him. A 38-42 type of advantage for Trump and we would see an electoral landslide as a result.
By sending ballots to every single voter that is registered this will remove any need for effort to be put forth to vote. This would make it so that the 30% of democratic voters who would have stayed home will probably end up voting for Biden. It was brought to them with no effort in the same way polling company that calls them at home is, and we would probably see similar results.
a 38-43 trump landslide win flipped to a 55-45 Biden advantage just by removing the the need to actually do something to vote for a candidate.
They would do this all without the need for even one single fraudulent vote. If you also think about how many black city voters would be added in red states, this spells trouble. Blacks are one of the communities least enthusiastic about voting for a biden harris ticket, but many of them still would pick them over Trump if they could do so without having to make an effort. As a result of this alone could see Red States go blue that would never have a chance otherwise. Florida. Indiana. Ohio.
As a terrifying example, Trump trounced Hillary in Indiana and it wasn't close, he won 1,557,286 votes (57%) to her 1,033,266 (37%). The difference in this is over half a million votes. In fact Clinton only won 4 counties, monroe, marion, lake, and st joseph. But if just these 4 counties had managed 100 voter turnout from both democrat and republic registered voters,,similar to what we might expect with a mail in, and if each county retained the same percent of votes for Republican and the same percent for Democrats this would have resulted in Clinton beating Trump by a margin of 1,637,368 votes to 1,433,447 votes. That's a terrifying realization. This is in a state he won handily. In states that he won by much smaller margin it would only take a 5% increase in dem turnout to change the outcome. The point? The problem Trump is facing if they are able to negate the effect of the enthusiasm gap is compounded by the fact that higher population centers counties almost always have a higher percentage of democrat voters as well.
Put simply, a mail in vote would turn what should be a Trump landslide into a potential disaster and probably into a Biden victory. We are in real trouble with the scenario the Dems have set up going into the election.
I think our approach so far has been off the mark and ineffective.
Complaining does nothing, although I agree with what Trump has said, it will not change what's coming.
We need to find a way to stop the kind of mail in voting that features ballots being sent out indescrementntly.
We need to make sure people don't get ballots without first taking the time to go through the process of submitting a written request for that ballot.
If we can just ensure this step we're golden, the enthusiasm gap is back in play.
I recommend that Trump says something like,
"ok, fine. We can do mail in. However, it needs to be universal and consistent from state to state. We will set up a federal mail in system, but there will be some rules that every state will need to follow in order to ensure it is both safe and secure.
Rule 1. Ballots are only shipped to people who go online and fill out a form to apply for one. have them at "election2020.gov"
"We need to ensure that ballots are going to people who are still alive, living at the same address, and to make sure we do not have dogs and cats getting ballots. Clearly we can not just email them to every registered voter, this has led to chaos. We can ensure that everyone who wants a ballot is able to get one, however. This will be done through an easy and clear process that will be the same for every state.
They would just need to answer a few simple questions such as "what is your current address," name, age, etc, and once this was completed a ballot would be sent to the voter through the mail. They would then notify the election website that they had received the ballot, and the system would make sure no one else could use the same name and address to obtain another ballot.
There will be no mass mailing of ballots to all registered voters or the mass mailing of applications for ballots. The application process will be announced on TV, through the federal government, online, etc so that it is well known to all Americans. No applications or Ballots are allowed to be sent to someone who did not first request them. Period This is the crux of this entire idea.
People would still have the option to vote in public if they so chose.
The ballots can not be picked up by anyone other than an officially designated mail carrier assigned exclusively to the role of picking up votes that day.
Each vote collector would be accompanied by one or two independent election observers.. both the observer and carrier would be required to wear bodycams that would be publicly broadcasting their feeds online so that citizens could monitor every step of the process. If at any time all cameras went off the truck would be stopped and law enforcement would follow up with the situation to ensure that there was no fraud occurring. Cameras could also be set up in the cars and at election counting locations so that every step was done in the public eye. After each route ballots are immediately brought to the counting location and dropped off. The route is then repeated through out the day.
The votes would all be collected on November 3rd. Not after. Not before, (unless you ask for an absentee ballots. They would be different.) Polls end with one final round by the post carrier who had been designated to pick up votes, the last round would start at 9 PM (or whenever). After that final round is over, no more ballots are to be accepted from any source (outside of absentee ballots if that's how they already work), no arguments.
Voters would have options of several drop off boxes to choose from for a drop off location for their ballot. There would be specifically designated election drop off boxes that would be announced weeks before the election and marked as such in order to avoid confusion. They would have a postal worker and election observer make sure only ballots were put in the drop boxes.As the vote collector would be making several rounds throughout the day those concerned with people stealing ballots could wait for the person to come by before dropping their ballot in the box.
They could also give people the option of using their own mailbox with a raised flag.
8 The envelope sent with a ballot would be federally designed to ensure there was no way of determining who the vote was for without opening it. No serial numbers with an R or.a D on the OUTSIDE of the ballots. No see through paper or red dots on Republican ballots.
Each 5th or 10th, or 100th could potentially be tagged with a GPS device to make sure ballots do not wind up anywhere but the drop off boxes, the trucks, or the counting locations.location
There are designated vote counting locations where the special vote collectors would take them directly. The ballots would be fed into these machines, which would be responsible for unsealing them and reading the results. These facilities could also be publicly broadcast so people could keep an eye on things. Once a Cote I successfully counted the account used to request the ballot and sign off that arrived will be updated to show that it had been counted.
Introduce it like it's a peace offering to the democrats. "We know you have wanted mail in voting, we have decided to work with you on this issue by creating a proposal that would create a nationwide mail in voting system. This way we can ensure that American's can vote from the safety of their homes and also retain confidence in the election outcome."
If they refuse to sign a nationwide mail in system that follows the rules outlined, make it a voluntary service that would be provided to states that ask to be a part of it.
This would create a pretty clear public image issue for those states that would turn it down. Democrats have been demanding a vote by mail system for months, even withholding coronavirus relief until it was added, and here Trump is agreeing to set up a system. The left leaning states would look ridiculous turning it down, and would make people see that this mail in issue has never been about public safety.
Also, their plan to cause chaos using poorly thought out mail in policies and by allowing ballot harvesting will backfire. The plan is to blame Trump and claim that he caused the chaos by defunding the post office in order to suppress voters. How absurd would they look claiming this after they had turned federal assistance? They would look ridiculous blaming Trump after he had offered them an out, especially if every state that had accepted the federal system managed to pull off a smooth election and was able to post clear results on election night.
Also, if it is voluntary, most Republican states will sign up and be happy to accept the help and guidance, preventing the cities from becoming overrepresented through the mass mail scenario currently planned by dems. The blue states can do whatever they do as they're mostly decided anyway, and there is only so much damage that can be done. The swing states will have to be fought for, but this will at least give state leaders and easy out when they're being pressured to implement mail in. They can agree while also keeping republicans happy because they will trust the implementation.
I truly believe that this is our only hope of defeating the democrats plans for mail in voting. Like it or not it will be a large part of this election, let's throw a wrench in their plans and make sure that it's able to be carried out without inflating their turnout and without risk for chaos and to question Trump's legitimacy for another 4 years.
This needs to be started put into action yesterday, and if all efforts are out towards this there's no reason we couldn't pull it off.
Signing up would also result in the federal government paying for the infrastructure and the operations, saving the states that agreed money.
I believe I have come up with a way to stop the left wing mail-in scheme. I think that in an election that is fair and conducted normally, Trump wins in a landslide electorally. However I think that in this election that is coming up Biden has the upper hand because they've figured out how to steal the election without the need for any outright fraud.
As they point out, there really hasn't been much widespread fraud in our national elections. Now this isn't because Dems wouldn't do it, their primaries are riddled with fraud, but they have been unable to really carry that over to national votes.
The fact that they didn't manage to steal the election with fraud in 2016, after they had rigged the primaries and I was sure they would, I started thinking that maybe it's either harder than we think to pull off. Maybe it's too large a risk.
But if they're not pushing mail in to make things easier for fraud then why is that their clear plan forward? The advantage Trump has over Biden is not having more people who plan to be voters for him. there are probably more Democrats than Trump voters if we are being realistic, propaganda is effective.
No, his advantage is largely due to the tremendous gap in enthusiasm between Trump and Biden voters. Very few people are excited to vote for Joe and Kamala, but they would if it came down to it purely because they hate trump. We know what these voters usually do on election day, and a good portion of them stay home. They would have voted Biden, but they're not going to make an effort or put in any amount of work to do so. This could realistically be about 30% of people (who tell polls they would vote for Biden) who end up just staying home. These candidates are really that unappealing and unpopular with the left. Just for an idea of what this could mean in terms of real outcomes... Let's say there is a 55-45 split, 55 for Biden and 45 for Trump. Well, a 30% stay home rate would bring Biden down down to 38.5%.
On the flip side, most Trump voters will do anything to vote for him, they are tremendously enthusiastic and excited. At most around 5% of people who claim they're Trump voters in polls might stay home on election day. If we go off the assumed 55-45 biden trump split, this would bring Trump to 42.5%. We would go from 55-45 favoring Biden when it comes purely to people's preference, but there is a 38-43 split in favor of Trump when it comes to people's willingness to actually drive to a poll, standing in line, and voting for him. A 38-42 type of advantage for Trump and we would see an electoral landslide as a result.
By sending ballots to every single voter that is registered this will remove any need for effort to be put forth to vote. This would make it so that the 30% of democratic voters who would have stayed home will probably end up voting for Biden. It was brought to them with no effort in the same way polling company that calls them at home is, and we would probably see similar results.
a 38-43 trump landslide win flipped to a 55-45 Biden advantage just by removing the the need to actually do something to vote for a candidate.
They would do this all without the need for even one single fraudulent vote. If you also think about how many black city voters would be added in red states, this spells trouble. Blacks are one of the communities least enthusiastic about voting for a biden harris ticket, but many of them still would pick them over Trump if they could do so without having to make an effort. As a result of this alone could see Red States go blue that would never have a chance otherwise. Florida. Indiana. Ohio.
As a terrifying example, Trump trounced Hillary in Indiana and it wasn't close, he won 1,557,286 votes (57%) to her 1,033,266 (37%). The difference in this is over half a million votes. In fact Clinton only won 4 counties, monroe, marion, lake, and st joseph. But if just these 4 counties had managed 100 voter turnout from both democrat and republic registered voters,,similar to what we might expect with a mail in, and if each county retained the same percent of votes for Republican and the same percent for Democrats this would have resulted in Clinton beating Trump by a margin of 1,637,368 votes to 1,433,447 votes. That's a terrifying realization. This is in a state he won handily. In states that he won by much smaller margin it would only take a 5% increase in dem turnout to change the outcome. The point? The problem Trump is facing if they are able to negate the effect of the enthusiasm gap is compounded by the fact that higher population centers counties almost always have a higher percentage of democrat voters as well.
Put simply, a mail in vote would turn what should be a Trump landslide into a potential disaster and probably into a Biden victory. We are in real trouble with the scenario the Dems have set up going into the election.
I think our approach so far has been off the mark and ineffective.
Complaining does nothing, although I agree with what Trump has said, it will not change what's coming.
We need to find a way to stop the kind of mail in voting that features ballots being sent out indescrementntly.
We need to make sure people don't get ballots without first taking the time to go through the process of submitting a written request for that ballot.
If we can just ensure this step we're golden, the enthusiasm gap is back in play.
I recommend that Trump says something like,
"ok, fine. We can do mail in. However, it needs to be universal and consistent from state to state. We will set up a federal mail in system, but there will be some rules that every state will need to follow in order to ensure it is both safe and secure.
Rule 1. Ballots are only shipped to people who go online and fill out a form to apply for one. have them at "election2020.gov"
"We need to ensure that ballots are going to people who are still alive, living at the same address, and to make sure we do not have dogs and cats getting ballots. Clearly we can not just email them to every registered voter, this has led to chaos. We can ensure that everyone who wants a ballot is able to get one, however. This will be done through an easy and clear process that will be the same for every state.
They would just need to answer a few simple questions such as "what is your current address," name, age, etc, and once this was completed a ballot would be sent to the voter through the mail. They would then notify the election website that they had received the ballot, and the system would make sure no one else could use the same name and address to obtain another ballot.
-
There will be no mass mailing of ballots to all registered voters or the mass mailing of applications for ballots. The application process will be announced on TV, through the federal government, online, etc so that it is well known to all Americans. No applications or Ballots are allowed to be sent to someone who did not first request them. Period This is the crux of this entire idea.
-
People would still have the option to vote in public if they so chose.
-
The ballots can not be picked up by anyone other than an officially designated mail carrier assigned exclusively to the role of picking up votes that day.
-
Each vote collector would be accompanied by one or two independent election observers.. both the observer and carrier would be required to wear bodycams that would be publicly broadcasting their feeds online so that citizens could monitor every step of the process. If at any time all cameras went off the truck would be stopped and law enforcement would follow up with the situation to ensure that there was no fraud occurring. Cameras could also be set up in the cars and at election counting locations so that every step was done in the public eye. After each route ballots are immediately brought to the counting location and dropped off. The route is then repeated through out the day.
-
The votes would all be collected on November 3rd. Not after. Not before, (unless you ask for an absentee ballots. They would be different.) Polls end with one final round by the post carrier who had been designated to pick up votes, the last round would start at 9 PM (or whenever). After that final round is over, no more ballots are to be accepted from any source (outside of absentee ballots if that's how they already work), no arguments.
-
Voters would have options of several drop off boxes to choose from for a drop off location for their ballot. There would be specifically designated election drop off boxes that would be announced weeks before the election and marked as such in order to avoid confusion. They would have a postal worker and election observer make sure only ballots were put in the drop boxes.As the vote collector would be making several rounds throughout the day those concerned with people stealing ballots could wait for the person to come by before dropping their ballot in the box.
They could also give people the option of using their own mailbox with a raised flag.
8 The envelope sent with a ballot would be federally designed to ensure there was no way of determining who the vote was for without opening it. No serial numbers with an R or.a D on the OUTSIDE of the ballots. No see through paper or red dots on Republican ballots.
-
Each 5th or 10th, or 100th could potentially be tagged with a GPS device to make sure ballots do not wind up anywhere but the drop off boxes, the trucks, or the counting locations.location
-
There are designated vote counting locations where the special vote collectors would take them directly. The ballots would be fed into these machines, which would be responsible for unsealing them and reading the results. These facilities could also be publicly broadcast so people could keep an eye on things. Once a Cote I successfully counted the account used to request the ballot and sign off that arrived will be updated to show that it had been counted.
Introduce it like it's a peace offering to the democrats. "We know you have wanted mail in voting, we have decided to work with you on this issue by creating a proposal that would create a nationwide mail in voting system. This way we can ensure that American's can vote from the safety of their homes and also retain confidence in the election outcome."
If they refuse to sign a nationwide mail in system that follows the rules outlined, make it a voluntary service that would be provided to states that ask to be a part of it.
This would create a pretty clear public image issue for those states that would turn it down. Democrats have been demanding a vote by mail system for months, even withholding coronavirus relief until it was added, and here Trump is agreeing to set up a system. The left leaning states would look ridiculous turning it down, and would make people see that this mail in issue has never been about public safety.
Also, their plan to cause chaos using poorly thought out mail in policies and by allowing ballot harvesting will backfire. The plan is to blame Trump and claim that he caused the chaos by defunding the post office in order to suppress voters. How absurd would they look claiming this after they had turned federal assistance? They would look ridiculous blaming Trump after he had offered them an out, especially if every state that had accepted the federal system managed to pull off a smooth election and was able to post clear results on election night.
Also, if it is voluntary, most Republican states will sign up and be happy to accept the help and guidance, preventing the cities from becoming overrepresented through the mass mail scenario currently planned by dems. The blue states can do whatever they do as they're mostly decided anyway, and there is only so much damage that can be done. The swing states will have to be fought for, but this will at least give state leaders and easy out when they're being pressured to implement mail in. They can agree while also keeping republicans happy because they will trust the implementation.
I truly believe that this is our only hope of defeating the democrats plans for mail in voting. Like it or not it will be a large part of this election, let's throw a wrench in their plans and make sure that it's able to be carried out without inflating their turnout and without risk for chaos and to question Trump's legitimacy for another 4 years.
This needs to be started put into action yesterday, and if all efforts are out towards this there's no reason we couldn't pull it off.
Signing up would also result in the federal government paying for the infrastructure and the operations, saving the states that agreed money.
I believe I have come up with a way to stop the left wing mail-in scheme. I think that in an election that is fair and conducted normally, Trump wins in a landslide electorally. However I think that in this election that is coming up Biden has the upper hand because they've figured out how to steal the election without the need for any outright fraud.
As they point out, there really hasn't been much widespread fraud in our national elections. Now this isn't because Dems wouldn't do it, their primaries are riddled with fraud, but they have been unable to really carry that over to national votes.
The fact that they didn't manage to steal the election with fraud in 2016, after they had rigged the primaries and I was sure they would, I started thinking that maybe it's either harder than we think to pull off. Maybe it's too large a risk.
But if they're not pushing mail in to make things easier for fraud then why is that their clear plan forward? The advantage Trump has over Biden is not having more people who plan to be voters for him. there are probably more Democrats than Trump voters if we are being realistic, propaganda is effective.
No, his advantage is largely due to the tremendous gap in enthusiasm between Trump and Biden voters. Very few people are excited to vote for Joe and Kamala, but they would if it came down to it purely because they hate trump. We know what these voters usually do on election day, and a good portion of them stay home. They would have voted Biden, but they're not going to make an effort or put in any amount of work to do so. This could realistically be about 30% of people (who tell polls they would vote for Biden) who end up just staying home. These candidates are really that unappealing and unpopular with the left. Just for an idea of what this could mean in terms of real outcomes... Let's say there is a 55-45 split, 55 for Biden and 45 for Trump. Well, a 30% stay home rate would bring Biden down down to 38.5%.
On the flip side, most Trump voters will do anything to vote for him, they are tremendously enthusiastic and excited. At most around 5% of people who claim they're Trump voters in polls might stay home on election day. If we go off the assumed 55-45 biden trump split, this would bring Trump to 42.5%. We would go from 55-45 favoring Biden when it comes purely to people's preference, but there is a 38-43 split in favor of Trump when it comes to people's willingness to actually drive to a poll, standing in line, and voting for him. A 38-42 type of advantage for Trump and we would see an electoral landslide as a result.
By sending ballots to every single voter that is registered this will remove any need for effort to be put forth to vote. This would make it so that the 30% of democratic voters who would have stayed home will probably end up voting for Biden. It was brought to them with no effort in the same way polling company that calls them at home is, and we would probably see similar results.
a 38-43 trump landslide win flipped to a 55-45 Biden advantage just by removing the the need to actually do something to vote for a candidate.
They would do this all without the need for even one single fraudulent vote. If you also think about how many black city voters would be added in red states, this spells trouble. Blacks are one of the communities least enthusiastic about voting for a biden harris ticket, but many of them still would pick them over Trump if they could do so without having to make an effort. As a result of this alone could see Red States go blue that would never have a chance otherwise. Florida. Indiana. Ohio.
As a terrifying example, Trump trounced Hillary in Indiana and it wasn't close, he won 1,557,286 votes (57%) to her 1,033,266 (37%). The difference in this is over half a million votes. In fact Clinton only won 4 counties, monroe, marion, lake, and st joseph. But if just these 4 counties had managed 100 voter turnout from both democrat and republic registered voters,,similar to what we might expect with a mail in, and if each county retained the same percent of votes for Republican and the same percent for Democrats this would have resulted in Clinton beating Trump by a margin of 1,637,368 votes to 1,433,447 votes. That's a terrifying realization. This is in a state he won handily. In states that he won by much smaller margin it would only take a 5% increase in dem turnout to change the outcome. The point? The problem Trump is facing if they are able to negate the effect of the enthusiasm gap is compounded by the fact that higher population centers counties almost always have a higher percentage of democrat voters as well.
Put simply, a mail in vote would turn what should be a Trump landslide into a potential disaster and probably into a Biden victory. We are in real trouble with the scenario the Dems have set up going into the election.
I think our approach so far has been off the mark and ineffective.
Complaining does nothing, although I agree with what Trump has said, it will not change what's coming.
We need to find a way to stop the kind of mail in voting that features ballots being sent out indescrementntly.
We need to make sure people don't get ballots without first taking the time to go through the process of submitting a written request for that ballot.
If we can just ensure this step we're golden, the enthusiasm gap is back in play.
I recommend that Trump says something like,
"ok, fine. We can do mail in. However, it needs to be universal and consistent from state to state. We will set up a federal mail in system, but there will be some rules that every state will need to follow in order to ensure it is both safe and secure.
Rule 1. Ballots are only shipped to people who go online and fill out a form to apply for one. have them at "election2020.gov"
"We need to ensure that ballots are going to people who are still alive, living at the same address, and to make sure we do not have dogs and cats getting ballots. Clearly we can not just email them to every registered voter, this has led to chaos. We can ensure that everyone who wants a ballot is able to get one, however. This will be done through an easy and clear process that will be the same for every state.
They would just need to answer a few simple questions such as "what is your current address," name, age, etc, and once this was completed a ballot would be sent to the voter through the mail. They would then notify the election website that they had received the ballot, and the system would make sure no one else could use the same name and address to obtain another ballot.
-
There will be no mass mailing of ballots to all registered voters or the mass mailing of applications for ballots. The application process will be announced on TV, through the federal government, online, etc so that it is well known to all Americans. No applications or Ballots are allowed to be sent to someone who did not first request them. Period This is the crux of this entire idea.
-
People would still have the option to vote in public if they so chose.
-
The ballots can not be picked up by anyone other than an officially designated mail carrier assigned exclusively to the role of picking up votes that day.
-
Each vote collector would be accompanied by one or two independent election observers.. both the observer and carrier would be required to wear bodycams that would be publicly broadcasting their feeds online so that citizens could monitor every step of the process. If at any time all cameras went off the truck would be stopped and law enforcement would follow up with the situation to ensure that there was no fraud occurring. Cameras could also be set up in the cars and at election counting locations so that every step was done in the public eye. After each route ballots are immediately brought to the counting location and dropped off. The route is then repeated through out the day.
-
The votes would all be collected on November 3rd. Not after. Not before, (unless you ask for an absentee ballots. They would be different.) Polls end with one final round by the post carrier who had been designated to pick up votes, the last round would start at 9 PM (or whenever). After that final round is over, no more ballots are to be accepted from any source (outside of absentee ballots if that's how they already work), no arguments.
-
Voters would have options of several drop off boxes to choose from for a drop off location for their ballot. There would be specifically designated election drop off boxes that would be announced weeks before the election and marked as such in order to avoid confusion. They would have a postal worker and election observer make sure only ballots were put in the drop boxes.As the vote collector would be making several rounds throughout the day those concerned with people stealing ballots could wait for the person to come by before dropping their ballot in the box.
They could also give people the option of using their own mailbox with a raised flag.
-
The envelope sent with a ballot would be federally designed to ensure there was no way of determining who the vote was for without opening it. No serial numbers with an R or.a D on the OUTSIDE of the ballots. No see through paper or red dots on Republican ballots.
-
Each 5th or 10th, or 100th could potentially be tagged with a GPS device to make sure ballots do not wind up anywhere but the drop off boxes, the trucks, or the counting locations.location
-
There are designated vote counting locations where the special vote collectors would take them directly. The ballots would be fed into these machines, which would be responsible for unsealing them and reading the results. These facilities could also be publicly broadcast so people could keep an eye on things.
Introduce it like it's a peace offering to the democrats. "We know you have wanted mail in voting, we have decided to work with you on this issue by creating a proposal that would create a nationwide mail in voting system. This way we can ensure that American's can vote from the safety of their homes and also retain confidence in the election outcome."
If they refuse to sign a nationwide mail in system that follows the rules outlined, make it a voluntary service that would be provided to states that ask to be a part of it.
This would create a pretty clear public image issue for those states that would turn it down. Democrats have been demanding a vote by mail system for months, even withholding coronavirus relief until it was added, and here Trump is agreeing to set up a system. The left leaning states would look ridiculous turning it down, and would make people see that this mail in issue has never been about public safety.
Also, their plan to cause chaos using poorly thought out mail in policies and by allowing ballot harvesting will backfire. The plan is to blame Trump and claim that he caused the chaos by defunding the post office in order to suppress voters. How absurd would they look claiming this after they had turned federal assistance? They would look ridiculous blaming Trump after he had offered them an out, especially if every state that had accepted the federal system managed to pull off a smooth election and was able to post clear results on election night.
Also, if it is voluntary, most Republican states will sign up and be happy to accept the help and guidance, preventing the cities from becoming overrepresented through the mass mail scenario currently planned by dems. The blue states can do whatever they do as they're mostly decided anyway, and there is only so much damage that can be done. The swing states will have to be fought for, but this will at least give state leaders and easy out when they're being pressured to implement mail in. They can agree while also keeping republicans happy because they will trust the implementation.
I truly believe that this is our only hope of defeating the democrats plans for mail in voting. Like it or not it will be a large part of this election, let's throw a wrench in their plans and make sure that it's able to be carried out without inflating their turnout and without risk for chaos and to question Trump's legitimacy for another 4 years.
This needs to be started put into action yesterday, and if all efforts are out towards this there's no reason we couldn't pull it off.
I have been thinking about how to stop the dems from stealing this election using the virus a an excuse to implement mail in voting. I realized something, that as much as it isn't a good arguement for mail in voting, that it is actually true that there really hasn't been much widespread fraud in our national elections. Now this isnt because Dems would not do it, their primaries are riddled with fraud and election Engineering. Before the 2016 election, Hillary covered the DNCs 34 million dollars of debt and in return was given operational control of the DNC 15 months before the democratic national convention had even chosen a candidate. In the 2015-2016 democratic primaries the Clinton campaign ran the DNC, and they used this power to A. sabotage Bernie with the press b. Favor Hillary's nomination. On top of this Engineering, they took part in outright fraud. They went to key strongholds of Bernie Sanders in the primaries and told Bernie supporters that their district had been changed and that they now needed to fill out absentee ballots instead of regular ones. The DNC then took these absentee ballots and tossed them. This is what pissed Seth Rich off enough to leak the emails, but I digress. They do it in democratic races, but seem to be unable to in national votes.
So they would do it if able, but they really haven't, they didn't in 2016 when I was sure they would. I believe that it's harder than we think, and that there might be a different reason for this mail in push outside of the increased ability to carry out fraud.
Think, what is the main advantage Ttump has over Biden right now? What factor makes Trump's victory the most likely outcome in a fair election? It isn't pure numbers, there are probably more Democrats than Trump voters if we are being realistic, propaganda is effective.
No, his advantage is largely due to the tremendous gap in enthusiasm between Trump and Biden voters. Very few people are excited to vote for joe and kamala, but they would because they hate trump. We know what these voters usually do on election day, a good portion of them stay home. They would have voted biden, but they're not going to make an effort. This could realistically be what 30% of people, people who tell polls they support biden, end up doing. This would take Biden from, let's say 55% (assuming a 55-45 split), down to 37%
On the flip side Trump voters will do anything to vote for him, they are tremendously enthusiastic and excited. At most 5% of people who claim they're Trump voters in polls might stay home. If we go off a 55-45 biden trump split, his would be 42.5%. We go from 55-45 favoring Biden, to to 38-43, in favor of Trump.
Now considering that Trump stands to win with less overall voters because of the concentration of Biden voters in several small areas like LA and NY, this would represent an electoral landslide. These numbers would result in an absolute landslide victory for Trump, despite Biden have more people who would tell a poll that they're voting Biden.
The deep state knows this, but what can they do? Well, what if they removed this factor entirely by sending ballots to every single voter so that the 30% of biden voters, who would have stayed home, end up voting anyway because it was brought to them with no effort.
This would take an in person, enthusiasm influenced election of 38-43 trump win and take it right back to 53-47 biden advantage.
All without the need for even one single fraudulent vote. Now if you combine this with the increased turnout we would see from black city voters in red states, it would spell trouble. Blacks are among the community least enthusiastic about biden harris, but most of them still would pick them if they could do so without making effort. As a result of this alone could see Red States go blue that would never have a chance otherwise. Florida. Indiana. Ohio.
Put simply, a mail in vote would turn what should be a Trump landslide into a potential Biden victory. Add in their power to use big tech to implement election Engineering to target key areas and we are in real trouble.
We need find a way to stop mail in voting without the voter submitting an expressed request for the ballot. If we can just get that win we're golden.
I reccomend Trump Say, "ok, fine. We can do mail in. However, it needs to be universal and consistent from state to state. Some rules, to ensure they are still alive and at the same address, and to make sure we do not have dogs and cats getting ballots,
The voter must first request a mail in ballot of their volition.
There will be no prompts or mass mailing to all registered voters. The ballots can not be picked up by anyone other than an officially designated mail carrier assigned exclusively to picking up votes that day.they each would be accompanied by a independent election observer and would have cameras in the car, both the observer and carrier wearing bodycams that would be publicly broadcast online for citizens to monitor, and if they both went off the truck would stopped and law enforcement would follow up with the situation to ensure there's no fraud occurring
The votes would all be collected on November 3rd. Not after. Not before, (unless you ask for an absentee ballots. They would be different.) Polls end with one final round by the post carrier designated to pick up votes, starting at 9 or 10 pm. After that it is over, no arguements.
Voters would have two options, leave them in their mail box with the flag up, or drop them at designated election drop off boxes that would be announced weeks before to avoid confusion. As the vote collector would be making several rounds, those concerned with people stealing ballots could wait for the person to come by or use the boxes.
The envelope would be federally designed to ensure there was no way of determining who the vote was for without opening it. No serial numbers with an R or.a D on the OUTSIDE of the ballots. No see through paper or red dots on Republican ballots.Each 5th or 10th envelope would have a GPS trackable chip inserted to help election HQ in DC monitor that the votes are going, from mailboxes to counting stations only. No missing stacks of envelopes.envelopes.
This is our only hope of defeating mail in. If we don't ensure it's done properly, negating the advantage the dems hope to gain, States will just do their own version and there will be fraud and rampant mistakes, missing votes, confused voters, dead people, harvesting, and they will bypass the enthusiasm issue the dems have. We can't stop them. The only way forward is to make sure we get it done properly AND ONLY BY REQUESTING A BALLOT WOULD ONE RECEIVE A BALLOT. If the th dems refuse or states insist on doing things there way it would certainly raise eyebrows among normies, why would you not want federal help making sure the vote by mail runs smoothly?
It would help us get the vote that's scared of Covid but still wmags trump as well.
This was a lot, but I've been thinking hard about this and it's the only option I can see to negate the negatives of Mail in and to STOP THE THEFT OF THIS ELECTION.
Plus, if the Dems refuse to agree it would make it clear that their push for mail in is not about making sure people are safe. They just want to take advantage of chaos that they are making. If nothing can be agreed upon federally, or states argue that state's rights allow them to run their own elections however they want, make it voluntary Offer the help running the system, with federal dollars, if they're interested. We could at least prevent any Republican leading states from being stolen because they would likely all sign up.
Also, after the election when every state that accepted the federal system ran smoothly and without issue, it will be clear that the Democratic states did it to themselves when they're finding boxes of votes hidden inside closets at city hall or left abandoned underneath freeway signs. When they're adding votes to Bidens total weeks or claiming Trump needs to be impeached because he defunded the post office and caused this mess they've found themselves in, people will remember that Trump had offered them a way out. They ignored him. They will have a much harder time blaming Trump or stealing trump's win by using states that refused to sign up for a mail in election program that worked everywhere it was used.
Please, get this to the top. We know the Trump Administration lurks. I want it to at least be brought to Trump as an option. I think this is the perfect counter, the only counter, and that it needs to start being put together yesterday.