Sign In or Create an Account
Here's what I wrote for those not on the platform or wanting to give it a click:
If you believe in COVID-19 vaccine mandates, where do you draw the line?
Are you 100% confident that everybody regardless of their situation receive the shot, that natural immunity from prior infection cannot be effective, that the vaccine is perfectly safe for all, and that there are no possible alternative therapies outside of vaccination?
Do you think every child must receive the shot even if their death rate from Covid is less than 1 in 135,000 (under 1 in 500,000 if healthy) and no vaccine in the world is applied to a cohort with a risk that small.
Are you convinced that thousands of doctors and healthcare workers who are losing everything for refusing the vaccine are stupid?
Do you believe the hundreds of studies about risks from COVID-19 vaccine technology, and benefits of alternative therapies are all fraudulent, along with the authors who are leaders in their fields including Nobel prize winners and inventors of vaccine technologies?
Do you believe medical care including vital transplant operations should be denied? Should the unjabbed be fired from their job, not allowed to receive any government assistance, even social security or medicare? Should all exemptions be denied, as is happening in many places, even if for a deeply held religious belief or for being in a medical trial to advance Covid research, such as monoclonal antibodies that doesn't allow #Covid vaccination during the study period, often up to 18 months?
What if it gets to the point where the government wants to put the unjabbed in camps - for their own safety of course? Will you be fine if it is decided that the unjabbed are just too much of a drain on society so need to be euthanized?
Where will you draw the line?
Not really owned by Gates, but by Microsoft, not that this makes your point any less valid about the s*tiness of the platform. Gates isn't even on the board any more, and stopped working for Microsoft about 12 years back after he had switched to software architect and given up the CEO role back in 2020. I worked for Microsoft for 13 years actually.
Agree, but it's the best platform for me to get the message out as I do have nearly 2K followers there. It is definitely censored as I have had articles taken down, but less censored at least at this point than the other social media platforms.
Note, these are copies only as of today so won't automatically be updated should the content get updated on the godaddysites.com site.
Ah, so use of a superlative adjective undermines all of the linked studies and data analysis in the paper so you don't even need to read it. Got it.
Anyone can enter VAERS data but that doesn't make it meaningless.
Around here, we expect people to back up their claims, so please refute these facts or just delete your post as it's BS.:
a. A recent study validated that 85% of VAERS reports are likely accurate.
b. Over 67% of VAERS reports are submitted by medical professionals.
If anything, VAERS is under-reporting. There is pressure to not report, particularly in the case of elderly.
Put it on Rumble and BitChute.
Needs to get it on other platforms such as BitChut, and especially Rumble. I'm finding videos with over 400K views for some Covid truth videos on Rumble.
That was based on VAERS, the rationale given with that was that they were including foreign totals being reported for the vaccine rather than US only by mistake. That might be an excuse but it might be true. So, I wouldn't hang my hat on that one.
However, the bottom line is that VAERS is terribly under-reporting, thousands of people who are being reported as unvaccinated are being reported as COVID deaths if they died from the jab within 14 days, doctors are being threatened with having their licenses taken away for reporting to VAERS, and there were thousands that died when first rolled out in nursing homes where no investigation was done.
Yeah, this was true as of a couple of months ago, but a lot more of these entities are now requiring it.
I don't hang my hat on this type of stuff any more than FDA approval with all of the corruption - it's meaningless anyways. Those who are important are going to get saline, particularly in the government where we have no access to know what is going on.
Only 1,000 children actually received the vaccine based on a 2K study population since there would have been 1K placebos. So, they've verified that the myocarditis occurrence rate being better than 1 in 1,000 at a 50/50 probability. The death rate from COVID is about 1 in 135,000 for this age group.
Here's an analysis and data sources:
Thanks for this, been looking for that data. Would be good to combine that with my statistical analysis proving that the sample size was inadequate by a factor of 6,000 to provide a cost/benefit to vaccine versus COVID regarding death rate (death rate for age 5 - 11 estimated at 1 out of 1 of 135,000 based on CDC data). Note, I assumed the death rate for age 5 -11 is half that of 5 - 17 since they don't break it down.
Statistical analysis of the validity of the trial. Spoiler alert: The trial was meaningless for actually validating vaccine safety.
There's this also concerning the trial for 5 - 11 year olds: