5
duality 5 points ago +6 / -1

Successfully convicting many high profile political criminals requires the the public's assent. Aligning the public to a message when the media propaganda apparatus is working directly and diligently against that same message takes a long time, if it can be done at all.

by Frosty
1
duality 1 point ago +1 / -0

AFAIR that money wasn't due to the current post-revolution government.

7
duality 7 points ago +8 / -1

My erection would open up a wormhole.

2
duality 2 points ago +2 / -0

You think Dubya got screwed? Or did he play along....

1
duality 1 point ago +1 / -0

I thought the cash was to refund all the foreign nationals who donated to the Clinton Foundation... but Hillary losing meant no play.

1
duality 1 point ago +1 / -0

Internet Rules:

1. Everyone on the web is a dude unless proven otherwise (i.e. TITS or GTFO)

4
duality 4 points ago +4 / -0

Just so you can tell your grandchildren that you were part of that fateful day we saved America from the Commie horde!

1
duality 1 point ago +1 / -0

One gripe. You wouldn't inject his DNA but his serum (which contain antibodies, including those for Chyna virus).

7
duality 7 points ago +10 / -3

(((exist)))

3
duality 3 points ago +3 / -0

We need to stop calling them "small" businesses. It lessens the seriousness of what is lost.

1
duality 1 point ago +1 / -0

To experience cognitive dissonance, you have to assess the logical consistency of your positions and/or thoughts. Do you really think those on the left perform such an exercise?

6
duality 6 points ago +6 / -0

UNL (University of Nebraska - Lincoln) are the Huskers UNO (University of Nebraska - Omaha) are the Mavericks

1
duality 1 point ago +2 / -1

Bro... calm down. You are looking like "the little bitch." You need to learn how to maintain frame. Also, positioning yourself as the sanctimonious one is no less Leftist than anything you are accusing Dialectic of. The time for politeness and civility is over. Only way to beat Leftists is to get them to break frame and start acting irrationally and defensively. Being the "nice guy" only allows them to structure the context of the discussion, then steamroll you.

1
duality 1 point ago +1 / -0

You don't get big in Hollywood without playing the game. And another four years of DJT will inevitably lead to public awareness of what "the game" really entails.

2
duality 2 points ago +2 / -0

"I'm not sure we need to bring George Soros into this." Who said that? It comes across as though a recording was played...

1
duality 1 point ago +1 / -0

Kill innocent people? Is that what you are suggesting?

2
duality 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well she called him a racist, hence the "woof" reply. Racist dog-whistle, I assume is what she was saying.

1
duality 1 point ago +1 / -0

OP = original post or original poster.

The OP made no mention of immigration, and both you and Harambe have brought the issue up with a focus on race. Yes, this is de facto race-baiting. Making posts/comments that draw the reader to see the issues in the contexts of race in such a way that provokes resentment is divisive. You are either allowing the Left to frame the political issues for you (and thus will always fall into their trap where they can pop the "racist" label on you, rendering your arguments useless towards others who may still be convinced), or are complicit in driving these racial divisions. How do you think "black or brown" citizens might view your positions? Framing any of these issues in the context of race is substantially less likely to draw people to our side.

Also, you are assuming that my position (or any, for that matter) on a moratorium is founded only on the race(s) of the immigrants, rather than on a lack of shared culture/values, etc. Again, that is how the Left frames and dismisses.

1
duality 1 point ago +1 / -0

The OP is not so much referring to overt "racism" as it is referring to slyly influencing others to see through the lens of race, with the goal of heightening racial tensions.

2
duality 2 points ago +2 / -0

Harambe, I understand the frustration with what is going on. Can we please be civil?

Please address specific aspects of the OP, rather than making assumptions about what I happen to "believe" or may be "denying."

Also, the OP was referring to CITIZENS of USA at this time.

Why do minorities vote left wing on average? Simply saying there is a "racial component" to it is nebulous. Is it genetic in nature? Unavoidable? Or has the media and Democrats worked to drive non-white Americans to their arms?

Why do minorities want to be racist towards us at an increasing rate? The media, Democrats, etc. exacerbating issues of race? Are they the ENEMY (or a component thereof) that I was speaking about in the OP?

You may not be explicitly race-baiting, but you are an unfortunate victim of it. The USA will be destroyed if this route is chosen. The rest of the world will then fall.

3
duality 3 points ago +3 / -0

Completely agree with a moratorium on immigration.

However, that is addressing the fact that an influx of immigration, particularly of a single race/ethnicity/group, over a short period of time, leads to a lack of assimilation or acculturation into the American culture.

Frankly, you are addressing an issue that is separate from the OP.

If America wants to survive as a nation, it needs to deal with the in-fighting we are experiencing NOW.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›