2
duckduck 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm sure they do. Especially if not wearing a mask is seen as rebellious, girls love the bad boys. However, just because they find them more attractive doesn't mean they will go out with them or even not go full-Karen on them for not wearing the mask.

34
duckduck 34 points ago +34 / -0

He says the right things, but if he believes what he says, then he needs to walk onto the senate floor, and demand action, to not leave or stop talking until something is done, hold up every single thing the senate can do until this is addressed. Make them arrest him, then get out and go back in and do it again.

2
duckduck 2 points ago +2 / -0

We saw what they did to the governor's future son-in-law, so don't be surprised if anybody is too afraid to do anything about this. It is beyond corrupt however, and the Georgia national guard should simply start arresting people and hold their own tribunals.

1
duckduck 1 point ago +1 / -0

The term "climate change" is so dumb, it makes a presumption that climate is naturally static, which is wrong in every way possible. There have been many ice ages over time, many warm periods, it is much more realistic to view the Earth climate as cyclic based likely on variations in orbit and sun output. The Earth has been around for 4 billion years, yet only data post 1940 is acceptable to be used? You know, because they don't like to include the 1930's in the data because it was the hottest decade on record, and hurts the curve on their "global warming" chart.

"Climate Change" is also a virtually unfalsifiable claim. It is hot today? Climate change. Is it cold today? Climate change. So they get to claim climate change if it's hot or if it's cold? What does the weather have to be to not fall under climate change? In order for a theory to qualify as science, it has to be falsifiable. It also really helps to be predictive, and climate scientists have just about the worst prediction success rate of any "scientists."

1
duckduck 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes, we did breed with the neanderthals, I think it is around 30% of people are descended from them. However, we still beat them, we extincted them (that's a proper term right?).

2
duckduck 2 points ago +2 / -0

I have seen theories that IQ is simply processing speed, the correlations are very high between the two. I think there is more to it than processing speed alone though.

4
duckduck 4 points ago +4 / -0

The most sensibly held view of this in actual (non-woke) psychology is essentially that heredity (genetics) determines a person's intelligence capacity, and then environment (learning) determines how much of that capacity is realized. So if you are born with a 120 IQ capacity, with good teaching that person could be 120, with bad teaching they could be 100 or even considerably lower. Whereas somebody born with an 80 IQ capacity, even with the absolute best teaching, they will cap out at around 80. It is actually the same as height, a person is born with a rough genetic set of maximum height, but with poor nutrition they may end up shorter, but even the best nutrition will not make a person 8 feet tall.

2
duckduck 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nah, we hunted those furry pachyderms. We also killed off the neanderthals.

1
duckduck 1 point ago +2 / -1

"Words." That is good stuff.

3
duckduck 3 points ago +3 / -0

In Portland they will absolutely throw you in jail and let the original offender go free.

3
duckduck 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is what happens when the Karens are put in charge. They clutch their pearls alot.

2
duckduck 2 points ago +2 / -0

Only morons believe 3am votes surges are legitimate. It saddens me that so many people are morons.

1
duckduck 1 point ago +1 / -0

Bush was a RINO, likely installed by the Democrats to make it appear as though Republicans could win elections, and say they weren't cheating. It is also possible that he was so dumb that he didn't realize he was a plant all along.

2
duckduck 2 points ago +2 / -0

This result would happen in any college classroom. The leftists would all walk to the "no" side and then the rest of the class would all give in to social pressure and say no also even if they don't mean it. People don't want to labelled as the racist who says they are proud. If someone right-wing had immediately went to the "yes" side, the peer pressure from the "no" side would not be nearly as effective. People are evolutionarily adapted to "fit in," because for most of our history, fitting in with the tribe was a literal life and death matter.

3
duckduck 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's a cost/benefit thing. Revolutions are always done by young males, because they have the most to gain and the littlest to lose. Older males have children, they have families, they can't afford the risk. It is the young who don't yet have kids that are willing to actually start the fight. Older adults will follow, but they won't initiate.

6
duckduck 6 points ago +6 / -0

I won't believe it until it happens. They will likely have a (totally legitimate) massive surge of blue votes at around 3:00am election night.

2
duckduck 2 points ago +2 / -0

You are probably right. The biggest obstacle would be for governments to attempt to launch "official" cryptocurrencies that they can more easily control.

1
duckduck 1 point ago +1 / -0

He will not finish the term. His life expectancy is already at zero statistically.

view more: Next ›