Not "do this right or don't do it at all." It should be "do it right or go to jail." Election fraud sentences should be made mandatory 100 years, obstructing auditing and observational poll-watching should be automatic death penalty.
If someone has to get a shot (vulnerable population) I'd still rather them take this single-shot non-mRNA one, even if it is technically less effective. And actually 64% is not far off from the flu vaccine effectiveness rate.
There is a wing of the Democrat part (the Warren wing) that wants to break up big tech. It would be in the best interests of the Republicans for them to support that Democratic wing in every way possible, even if they disagree about the reasons behind it, breaking the monopolies might be worth it.
Everyone knows this is true, how many Republican voters do you talk to that love politicians and elitists? That's why I don't understand the "never-third-party" people, why not? It would be the exact same voter base but with a new leader that actually listens to them. Sounds good to me.
I'll just say that the lobotomy was given the Nobel Prize because of it's wonderful "treatment" of psychological disorders. It is now viewed as an affront to humanity. "Transition surgery" will be viewed as equally horrible in the future, unfortunately it will take many horrible victims before the insane leftists realize how bad it is. Why do they not already see the unalterable castration of children who have no capacity to make an informed consent to the surgery as bad? Probably because they hate children, same reason they want abortions.
We already had them and they just ignored them and the states signed off on it, then the senate signed off on it, and of course the Supreme Court signed off on it. It's not the laws that are the problem, it is the people (not) enforcing the laws that are the problem.
There is just no way on Earth the lesbians will ever vote Republican. They would rather chop off their arm, even if they agreed with all the Republican policies. They just hate straight white men too much to ever even consider it. Gay men however might consider it, they would go against the left if they try to destroy gay culture because it is not inclusive enough. Also I don't think that gay men (at least half of them anyway) are anti-masculinity, half or so of them are specifically attracted to masculinity, and masculinity is the enemy of the left.
It is a decent target for the left. Only problem there is that their big city is actually not as big of a percent of the overall vote as places like Detroit or Atlanta. Still not a bad target. Another target for them that might make sense is strangely Utah, they have just the one big urban area (so only one district needed to rig it), and it is more valuable than the 3 electoral vote states that are deep red, and they can claim all Utah hated Republicans after they called Romney a traitor or whatever justification they have for when they cheat to steal states. They've lost Ohio and Iowa by such a large amount that they can't even cheat there, Texas and Florida have anti-cheating measures, and Missouri is hard because they would have to take 2 cities rather than 1. North Carolina is already one of their targets, of course.
Exactly like the flu shot, people in the vulnerable population are recommended to get it annually. Considering this virus is like the flu (or perhaps is just the flu), then this doesn't seem unreasonable to me. Treating the China Virus like the flu is what we should be doing as a society.