15

Those people are correct.

12

Those people are correct.

15
866

What is their argument? "It already happened" isn't an explanation. I know "covid" was their excuse for changing the rules, but what is their explanation for keeping those changes and letting them stand?

14

A network and site where free speech reigns and the truth can be found by everyone, and no social media company can censor it. The first path to taking back the country is take back the airwaves. People will be drawn to the truth. And Trump knows all their secrets, and I think he'll expose them all.

Don't get me wrong, this was a horrible day and horrible year for our country. There is a long way towards making America great again. This can be a powerful first step, a beacon of truth that no one can dampen.

402

If Antifa stormed the capitol, good for them, they finally did something right. If the corrupt politicians think they can steal our vote and just have us bend over and take it, they are wrong.

35

Seriously, what person would actually vote for any of the Republican congressmen or senators who signed off on the fraud? If they want a communist, they'll vote Democrat. If they want Republican, they sure as hell aren't voting for someone who endorsed the fraud. This must mean all voting is rigged.

26

Had to say it. Please laugh.

19

Honest question.

17

Keep it up! Stop the steal!

26

We didn't start this war. We are just the ones who will finish it.

46

Stop this now. Take back our country.

797

McConnell will not stand with the objections. We are on our own. It's time, our country is gone forever it we don't.

97

They have gone too far, and it ends now, we take our country back today. Good luck to all!

22

People coming to DC, be prepared to make citizen's arrests, especially if deputized using the Insurrection Act. All treasons elected officials must be arrested. But don't take them to a police station in DC, they'll just let them out. Load them onto a bus and drive them to a smaller Republican town and give them over to the sheriffs there. Maybe they deserve to be executed, but we do have to give them due process first.

29

Article II - Section 1

"Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector."

States that made election law changes without going through the legislature held invalid unconstitutional elections and must have their electors voided. State governors or supreme courts do not have the authority to change election laws and procedures. This is a stronger argument than fraud occurring, because it is inarguable. Pennsylvania extended their mail-in deadline until 6 days after the election, this change was not passed by the legislature. There is absolutely no argument against it, that is what happened. Someone could argue it should be counted anyway, but they can't argue that the state conducted a valid constitutional election.

64

It is the constitutional duty to overthrow a tyrannical government, and a government that does not allow a fair election is a tyrannical one. All the members of congress need to know there is a price to be paid if they betray their country. They need to be afraid. The "peaceful protest" stuff is over. Optics don't matter anymore. We are going to DC as an army, and will act accordingly. There is no second chance on this, this is for all the marbles. Do what must be done, no more, no less.

20

Here is my conspiracy theory. Trump invites the militia to D.C. for the electoral college. Electors get scared, refuse to come in person, insist on zooming in remotely. During the counting of the electors, a weird "glitch" happens and the electors from the contested states are somehow unable to connect, 404 error, and it is not possible for them to pledge their vote. No one gets to 270. The election is pushed to house delegates.

113

Baghdadi. If you recall afterwards, he said he couldn't tell anybody in congress beforehand because he knew they would leak it. So there has been at least one instance where Trump acted suddenly and decisively without letting anyone know in advance. People were upset that he had suddenly moved our troops out of Syria for seemingly no good reason, they did not know what was about to happen.

30

Or are they just going to conveniently not get around to them until after January 20th?

77

It is hard to believe that they just all nod along and repeat their stupid "no evidence" lines. Don't some of them have to know what they are doing is wrong? Stealing an election through fraud. And they can just look at themselves in the mirror and are totally okay with it? Shouldn't they feel some guilt? Or at least any kind of interest in the truth? I would want to know how Trump got 130,000 votes in two seconds in the middle of the night after they had stopped counting and sent the poll watchers home if that had happened. Seemed very suspicious, how would you have no questions about it? Maybe the NPC idea about people not being self-aware is actually true. The Democrats are acting cartoonishly evil, making actual lists of anyone who supported a certain candidate. I can't believe this is happening in our country.

Please don't let my country die.

12

My guess is North Dakota.

25

What can they possibly say or do that would be worse than what they already have been doing? Might as well just use the Insurrection Act.

13

I know the electoral college has to take place on a certain date, and there wouldn't be enough time to have a national or state do-over election before then. But as a way of finding a loophole for the electoral college, could all the states (or even just some) pledge their votes to the winner of a future do-over election to be held in January perhaps? I feel like the only fair resolution to all parties involved would be to have the election again, and the Democrats might actually agree to it because it would give them a better chance to win then if it comes down to the state delegations in the House.

view more: ‹ Prev