0
eawad 0 points ago +1 / -1

Unless he has that in an email or writing, it doesn't matter. It'll be his ass, not theirs.

1
eawad 1 point ago +1 / -0

Some decided to stay behind enemy lines, in case any pows showed up.

1
eawad 1 point ago +1 / -0

These ballots need to be serialized with markers indicating time of print, source of print (machine id), etc.

There should be no ballots without an identifiable source. No reason for it at all.

1
eawad 1 point ago +1 / -0

He's not inept. He knows exactly what he's doing. His agenda is carried all throughout twitter.

2
eawad 2 points ago +2 / -0

To be fair, republican politicians have a lot of bark but very little follow through. Plenty of easily provable shit that dems have done that never got charged or prosecuted. I've lost count in the past 4 years how many people have lied under oath to congress about one thing or another and nothing happens. TD would be checking in real time that what they said was blatant lies, and nada.

I was a HUGE fan of rowdy Gowdy until he just never followed through with anything. Then he bailed for a private sector gig which was sad.

We've got Obama and his crew dead to rights lying, spying, but no charges. No jail time.

1
eawad 1 point ago +1 / -0

There'd have to be some sort of separation of databases.

One database contains registered voter + ballot ID. This is to keep track of how many ballots are generated, who generated which ballot, where it was generated, chain of custody, etc.

The other database is ballot ID + vote tally.

The only issue with vote security is that it also will impact anonymity. I don't know if there is really a way to have both. And have it where an individual can go in person with a receipt and ID in hand and view their own vote in private to ensure it was recorded properly.

Someone smarter than me could probably do it. But honestly, if you presented me with the option of vote anonymity or vote security, I'd go with security.

2
eawad 2 points ago +2 / -0

So not showing up to even inspect them and make sure they counted properly is her being "on our side"?

Explain that. How does not even doing the bare minimum to say, "yes, looks like these can add and count votes properly" somehow in the party's favor? HOW IS THAT BENEFICIAL?

17
eawad 17 points ago +17 / -0

The inner envelop is the only way to have traceability I believe for mail ballots.

This seems SO stupid.

Like if I were making a voting system, each ballot would be tagged with a unique identifying number, that number associated with a voter. Scan the tag and you see the ballot's source (printed at polling place, mail, other), you see who generated the print, time of print, etc, etc.

USPS would be tasked with scanning that barcode and sending that info back to the polling place. USPS wouldn't have access to what the scan means, it would just send the fact that it scanned such a code to the polling station to be logged. Thus creating a chain of custody of the ballot as it traveled.

Like this isn't rocket science. There shouldn't be special envelopes needed. This whole system is retarded. Almost as if whoever set it up wanted to enable fraud.

1
eawad 1 point ago +1 / -0

Can you point out one or two of those pressers he did? Would be useful to hold up as proof when discussing this with the uninitiated.

5
eawad 5 points ago +5 / -0

Drop Benford's. It's not simple enough for the average voter and is easily dismissed because they won't understand it. It's fine as one among many pieces to present to a court to initiate recounts and investigate but it doesn't bolster the case for convincing average Joe.

Bellweather is strong though, especially when you can show the very simplified colored table.

If your goal is to convince the normies then the information needs to be easily digestible.

1
eawad 1 point ago +1 / -0

Only if there's someone willing to legally do something about it. If none of the courts care, if the DA/AG doesn't push for charges, then no, they are not fucked. They know the courts won't give a shit in most of these instances. They know charges won't be filed except in the most egregious cases. That's why they do it.

1
eawad 1 point ago +1 / -0

Doesn't the two-party consent only apply if both parties have a reasonable expectation of privacy?

If you're in a classroom or training session with many people then a "reasonable expectation of privacy" does not exist.

IANAL

10
eawad 10 points ago +10 / -0

This isn't even deep state. These are useful idiots.

I doubt there's anything coordinated at the lower levels like here. It's just a lot of opportunistic assholes fudging numbers and trying to hide it.

2
eawad 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sorry, thank you. You're right. I just got so excited and fired up when I saw the pic again that I just went to 2016.

4
eawad 4 points ago +4 / -0

Dude, I can not AFFORD 3 kids. Like holy shit where are people getting the money (that isn't welfare/foodstamps) to properly raise 3 kids at the same time?

0
eawad 0 points ago +1 / -1

You are exactly the kind of person who needs to stay the fuck home. You have no grasp on the optics of this shit, you have no idea that the AVERAGE person isn't getting the reality of the situation showed to them. So people like fatty in Denver who got shot and you only serve to provide ammo for the talking heads on MSM. "Violent right wing protestor shot in self defense after attacking brave hired security" "OH HUUUURRRR I GUESS NOW THE RIGHT HATES THE POLICE WHEN THEY'RE OFF THE CLOCK AND HIRED SECURITY"

Have you heard CNN mention the BLM affiliation of one of the people arrested in Michigan? No? Maybe MSNBC has brought up the anarchist anti-trump guy in that same plot? No? Nothing? But it's all being fed as right-wing Trump shit.

And despite not being for Trump and simply being anti-Whitmer, all those idiots had to do was sit back and do nothing. Whitmer was already destroying her state. The people were pretty much over it and she was only bleeding voters. Now she's a victim. Now she can point at anyone on the right and say "look, bad guys, those people are why you need me in power".

Also who the fuck cares if these commie larpers "rule the streets" in Seattle, or Portland, or LA? Those places are lost causes. Let them serve as examples of what happens when Dems are allowed unfettered leadership. The BEST thing that could happen is that the larpers get bored of trashing the city and they move into the suburbs where the average voter lives. Then they'll see what happens when people start invoking the 2nd amendment to defend their homes.

You think those vegan lesbians got flipped to the right because they saw some Proud Boys rally or some Support The Blue rally? Fuck no. They flipped because they saw just how insane the left was being. Remember that video of those guys saying they support BLM while a riot was going on outside and one of the rioters bricked their window? How much you want to bet they don't support BLM or the left nearly as much as they did prior to that?

So, again... sit your fat ass down, tell your dumbass relatives to sit down and shut up and stop posting on facebook, and let the left destroy itself.

60
eawad 60 points ago +71 / -11

People need to tell their boomer ass relatives to stop going out and larping with these communists.

The media is not on our side.

The local justice system is not on our side.

All we have to do is sit back and let them tear apart their own cities. That's it. It's the easiest thing to do!!!!