This is certainly an interesting rollercoaster.

I've been on this election almost 24/7 since the big day and I can assure you this is the only leftie-headline-worthy fuckup of the whole hearing.

I've been on this since the election almost 24/7 and I can assure you this is the only leftie-headline-worthy fuckup of the whole hearing. Every other mistake I spotted was insignificant.

The 1.8M is actually what they sent out for the PRIMARY ELECTIONS. Someone confused the numbers.

This is where the 1.8M number comes from: https://data.pa.gov/Government-Efficiency-Citizen-Engagement/2020-Primary-Election-Mail-Ballot-Requests-Departm/853w-ecfz

The 1.8M is actually what they sent out for the PRIMARY ELECTIONS. Someone confused the numbers.

This is where the 1.8M number comes from: https://data.pa.gov/Government-Efficiency-Citizen-Engagement/2020-Primary-Election-Mail-Ballot-Requests-Departm/853w-ecfz

The 1.8M is actually what they sent out for the PRIMARY ELECTIONS. Someone confused the numbers.

This is where the 1.8M number comes from: https://data.pa.gov/Government-Efficiency-Citizen-Engagement/2020-Primary-Election-Mail-Ballot-Requests-Departm/853w-ecfz

The guy behind Newsmax is Lord Jacob Rees-Mogg, who is on the Queen's Privy Council, which means he is among the top 10 most powerful people in the UK. He's part of the old Establishment.

One of the people behind Newsmax is Lord Jacob Rees-Mogg, who is a member of the Queen's Privy Council -- her closest allies.

Dude, put a backup somewhere else, because this might go against github TOS since you are hosting stuff that you did not create and don't have the rights for.

That data was not good data. She should not have tweeted it.

I don't know his story well enough, sorry.