2
englishpleb 2 points ago +3 / -1

DNA specific bioweapon comes to mind

20
englishpleb 20 points ago +21 / -1

Still, props to them for going through with the boycott, only raises awareness of the cabal's perversion when they do that. Never thought Balenciaga was the last straw when Epstein's "suicide" didn't do the trick, but maybe that Twitter acquisition played a role.

0
englishpleb 0 points ago +1 / -1

"You believe and support things only communists believe and support."

What, Bill of Rights for all, guns for every law-abiding citizen, limited government? Sure would like to see you square that circle, as they say.

On the other hand, you're advocating putting a bullet in my head and deplatforming me for disagreement from your absolute "truth". I'll leave it to others to decide who the Communist is here lol

1
englishpleb 1 point ago +2 / -1

“Reported again, then. Your account is blown permanently.”

When you can’t win an argument, silence your opponent. How very like a Communist. Btw, this isn’t Reddit ;)

0
englishpleb 0 points ago +1 / -1

"You were already shown the quotes." When I ask for the founding documents of a company, I mean the legally binding part, not what occurred during negotiations nor thoughts that didn't make it to the contract. The quotes you showed DID NOT MAKE IT.

"You were already shown the text of the Constitution." You say it was implied to be "whites only", but no such specification in text exists. Useless.

"Reported for supporting ethnic genocide." This is the 3rd time now? My comments are still up. Maybe take that as an indicator of your delusional thinking, and work on bettering yourself. Btw, I'm on record supporting the right of all races to exist, and explicitly included whites in previous comments on this site. Though I suppose unfounded accusations from a small-fry minion of the great accuser isn't all that surprising ;)

0
englishpleb 0 points ago +1 / -1

White nationalists who didn’t think to specify “white” in the highest law of the land? Lol k cupcake :)

-1
englishpleb -1 points ago +1 / -2

"Explicitly specified. The link is right there."

Response is the same: It's an act of Congress. Why is there a Congress? Why does Congress have the authority to make law? There must already be some foundational documents that specify how the country should be run/initialized. Almost like the country was already given structure, or founded at that point. And if they were legally savvy enough to include the verbiage "white" in the linked inferior law, then why not in the highest law of the land, the Constitution or Bill of Rights? Then they were either legal fools, or didn't think it was important enough.

Btw, that law only specifies the naturalization process, not "ourselves and our posterity". If there were already non-white citizens in the US at the time, then they would be included. So your logic fails in that regard as well.

Again, not sure how to dumb this down further. If you still don't understand, then you're beyond my ability to help. Hope you figure yourself out.

0
englishpleb 0 points ago +1 / -1

Agree with most, but disagree on an important point. "You're missing the part where you cannot deprogram normies with truthful, factual information."

I personally know lifelong leftists that are turning due to the overreach of democrats, e.g. Ted Lieu on Twitter "ordering" Musk as a government official to stop posting "stupid shit" on twitter. Personally, think there will be a physical confrontation at some point, because these cabal members are too deep in depraved crimes to give up power peacefully. However, we can use the informational beachhead of Twitter to ensure as many people are on our side as possible when that occurs. We just acquired Twitter, why throw away that advantage so soon? Let the free info stew a bit in the minds of normies.

0
englishpleb 0 points ago +1 / -1

"Define take out: that can be as simple as expose and ostracize" Exactly, and we just acquired a beachhead in the form of Twitter. Why not let that stew a bit to accelerate the wake-up of normies, via Balenciaga, FTX, Hunter's laptop, Twitter doc drops, and potential future info? Why throw it away so soon by taking down the power grid ourselves?

-1
englishpleb -1 points ago +1 / -2

“One race”, “the same race”: not specified in the document. Ignorance of contracts

https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/United_States_Statutes_at_Large/Volume_1/1st_Congress/2nd_Session/Chapter_3

Conflating post-founding action with founding principles. If they thought that “white” was important to specify in that, then why not the Constitution or Bill of Rights? Because they didn’t. Don’t know how to dumb this down further, I’m really at a loss.

0
englishpleb 0 points ago +1 / -1

Your reading comprehension needs work. I said that the constitution is a legally binding document, but "to ourselves and our posterity" makes no such racial distinction. Again, ignorance in contracts showing. If it's not in the contract, it's not legally binding.

Btw, false reports can get you banned ;)

7
englishpleb 7 points ago +11 / -4

Seems to me we're better off leveraging the opening Musk brought about to invade the minds of normies instead of anything physical, but I'll bite. I've described the consequences above- how are those terms favorable, or am I missing something?

35
englishpleb 35 points ago +48 / -13

But it just so happens that the globalists want to de-industrialize the US, so this approach is just achieving their goals for them. Plus works for gun grabbing justification, as another user noted below, and distraction from twitter doc drops. Go further and disable the entire grid, and twitter doc drops will be neutralized entirely if most have no electricity.

False flag most likely. After all, who benefits? Was thinking the DS was too quiet with the loss of twitter and the doc drops. If they can't control the narrative via tech giants, they might be trying to flip over the game board.

0
englishpleb 0 points ago +1 / -1

You're probably right. Still worth arguing with them occasionally just to show the issues with their position, both to the more impressionable onlooker and leftoids looking to screencap.

1
englishpleb 1 point ago +2 / -1

True, municipal water seems unlikely. The NY mayor pushed drinking tap water via that cringy ad with the obvious cut, so you know no one trusts tap water even there.

All I know right now is malicious intent and a possible tool, would be worth keeping an eye out for possible methods to connect the tool to the intent.

2
englishpleb 2 points ago +3 / -1

Possible. But if the globalists are planning to collapse the industrialization soon, there won't be wealth to sustain that market. Could be that the cartels weren't let in on that part of the plan, but I can't help but think it's for something more nefarious.

-1
englishpleb -1 points ago +1 / -2

“To ourselves and our posterity” No such distinction made that's legally binding. Your victory condition is the same, and remains unmet: point to where such distinctions are made.

Btw, just declaring victory doesn't make it so. You sound like the gaslighting media.

Since you still haven't been able to put up, I'm assuming you can't. A more principled person would know it's time to shut up, but I know that's not you ;)

5
englishpleb 5 points ago +6 / -1

Wonder if they plan on putting that stuff in the water or something. The total amounts of fentanyl they keep bringing in over time seems like overkill just for drug sales.

0
englishpleb 0 points ago +2 / -2

"The text is blue" Not when you click the bell in dark mode. You really like quibbling over details, eh?

"NOPE. IT’S FOUNDATIONAL LAW. “TO OURSELVES AND OUR POSTERITY.” THEY WERE ALL WHITE. THEIR CHILDREN WERE ALL WHITE. THEY EXPLICITLY AND PUBLICLY SAID THAT THEY COULD NOT COMPREHEND ANY NONWHITE CITIZEN, EVER. YOU KNOW FUCKING NOTHING."

It's an act of Congress. Why is there a Congress? Why does Congress have the authority to make law? There must already be some foundational documents that specify how the country should be run/initialized. Almost like the country was already given structure, or founded at that point. ;)

Constitution, Bill of Rights. Your victory condition is the same, and remains unmet: point to where such distinctions are made.

view more: Next ›