3
entropy 3 points ago +3 / -0

I feel like if we do a good job vetting new citizens they won't be the bottom feeders that we get in large supply today. If your intent is to immediately go on some sort of assistance because you have no skills and speak little English then perhaps you won't be a good candidate for citizenship. I'm looking at you, chain migration.

9
entropy 9 points ago +9 / -0

In all fairness, it's sort of hard to make progress when you don't do an investigation. When noose-gate happened the FBI somehow had 20+ agents on the scene in less than 24 hours. But now? Crickets. Why are they not impounding evidence from these polling and counting locations? Bringing in witnesses for questioning? I have no words.

20
entropy 20 points ago +20 / -0

We are? If Trump loses, this will all get covered up never to be discussed again. Voting in the future will be meaningless.

18
entropy 18 points ago +18 / -0

For the record, many atheists believe that this election was stolen. You don't need to be a christian to support the president and see through this sham that is our voting system.

5
entropy 5 points ago +5 / -0

Presumably photographic evidence (of which there is plenty yet they continue to ignore it)? They probably want signed confessions...although then it would just be reported as coercion. There really is no way to win with them anymore. All of this rests on SCOTUS. Let's hope they do the right thing.

8
entropy 8 points ago +8 / -0

They discussed this "disappear folder" during Rudy's conference earlier today. I would HIGHLY recommend a watch to everyone if you haven't seen it. It's a very comprehensive list of allegations into mass voter fraud: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uiB6hPBb2Og

3
entropy 3 points ago +3 / -0

Not sure, but have you heard of this dude named Clinton? He got 370 and 379 electoral votes across two presidential elections. I think that they might have even certified him as president a couple of times...

1
entropy 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ahem, Arkansas would like to have a word with you.

2
entropy 2 points ago +2 / -0

For me, Ted is mostly on our side. But he's not a results kind of guy like Trump. Where would we be now if he had won four years ago instead of Trump? Even if Cruz has an identical agenda to Trump there is no way he has the backbone or fortitude to push through changes come hell or high water like Trump. Would we have new walls at the southern border? Peace deals in the middle east? Troop withdrawal? Covid vaccinations? Etc., etc.

I think that Cruz would have nominated good supreme court candidates, however.

4
entropy 4 points ago +4 / -0

What I'm most looking forward to is never hearing the phrase "well there has never been WIDESPREAD voter fraud."

5
entropy 5 points ago +5 / -0

Right. It should be easy enough to identify the folks who made this travesty happen.

5
entropy 5 points ago +5 / -0

My thoughts exactly. They believed in the pre-election polling too and just wanted a nice little lead, perhaps let Biden outperform the polls just a bit. They did NOT expect the Trump landslide and panicked.

3
entropy 3 points ago +3 / -0

I think you know why they're not covering it. But I agree with you, I wish SOMEONE in mainstream media would ask some tough questions on these glaring topics that have been known since the moment they occurred during the election two weeks ago!

1
entropy 1 point ago +3 / -2

"Truth, Justice and the American Way."

I haven't heard that phrase in forever! Gives me goosebumps to imagine having that kind of society back, where those values are held in high regard. I bet it would be lambasted as incredibly racist and nationalistic now by the left.

3
entropy 3 points ago +3 / -0

For real. People need to be in prison. Let's round up those workers who were present in these precincts and start pressuring them. I know I sound like a broken record but if we only had a federal investigative agency capable of doing these sorts of things, it would be wonderful.

24
entropy 24 points ago +24 / -0

I'm sure skim code could work at higher percentages, too (see the Venezuelan affidavit in Lin Wood's recent lawsuit) but they didn't want it to be a blow-out. I'm sure that they thought that Biden was going to do well anyway so they just needed to pad it a little bit. Their mistake was thinking that Biden was going to do well.

Personally, if people go to jail for this I think that we should look at collusion with the pollsters as well.

29
entropy 29 points ago +29 / -0

I don't think it was lazy. I believe that they didn't think that Trump is as popular as he is and would be able to turn out those types of numbers. If Trump came in even or slightly below everything would have worked fine; the poll numbers would have looked right and no one would be the wiser as the fraud was conducted across such a wide swath of the precincts. As it turns out, Trump is widely popular and drastic, last-minute measures needed to be taken in a small number of democrat-controlled battleground locations with the plausibility of having those types of votes.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›