You know the US constitution has some opinion on the form and function of state constitutions and division of powers.
Have you been paying attention? Yes judges have been subverting and injecting their desired outcomes into the legal system. They have stretched claims and simply ignored parts of suits during ruling to make their desired opinion not on the face seem ill considered. You only need to peer one layer down to see what a farce our courts really are.
Accelerationism is a thing
This is a threat. It is an obvious threat.
If they sue and fail not because she was right but because they can’t prove she was knowingly spreading falsehoods then they expose internal documents through discovery and look guilty of her accusations to the lay public. Seems like a lot to lose.
There are very good election law based cases to make already outside of what she is accusing that don’t have nearly the impediments to success. I’m all for letting her continue, but public focus should be on the immediate while she forms her case(s).
Part of a successful suit would require proof that Sidney knows what she is saying is untrue, not just that it is untrue. I don't think anyone doubts Sidney thinks it is true.
I think this is a fair take. Powell is on a separate timeline even if she is right.
That’s why you deal with that behind the scenes tactfully. They instead made public retribution and apology. They handled it terribly and exposed their apparent (lack of) values.
The dude from the blaze made an amazing mental connection. It was fantastic and made many buy the product just because.
Instead they spoke up ignorantly about something they admittedly do not understand while simultaneously taking a stance it is an American tragedy that Rittenhouse exercised his rights as an American citizen. They fucked up beyond comprehension. Now those same new and existing customers are dropping BRC.
I didn’t expect BRC to directly endorse, but I did expect them to not be two-faced about 2A.
Get the quotes from BRC here.
https://www.sltrib.com/news/2020/11/21/utah-coffee-company-faces/
Local news with quotes from BRC. They backed out of the back out and instead had words with the podcast. https://www.sltrib.com/news/2020/11/21/utah-coffee-company-faces/
I was that first to scene. Before even a mod had given comment context. You are lost for words, except for pede unity
Welcome. I expect Pepe Kraken imagery
There was a post on here to download the PA voter list. OP checked his name on the list to see it did not have a vote for this year while his Dem acquaintance did.
Voter data: https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8Sjcj1V/happening-a-user-just-purchased-/c/
Also a way to get an inactive voter record. the use a married woman’s maiden name to get absentee and vote.
Yeah, basically called out Cavuto for stopping the RNC presser earlier
I watched in real time as Twitter undid the disputed fact check on the tweet. Back now, but they were not so sure initially.
This is hard evidence of fraud. Disenfranchisement of legal right to inspect count process will disqualify those ballots.
The guy appears to be reading to the woman. But there is no verification going on the woman chose what he said.
Link and archive. Get out of here with screenshots
The only thing holding the printing part together is that the states like everything else they do contract out the job. Each state isn't setting up its own print process, they hired a company that specializes in printing ballots. That is the point of commonality.
SQL Server returns a null date column as 1/1/1900
What world are they in that sharpie dries faster than pen? Not in my experience
Like these graphs? https://twitter.com/andyswan/status/1323990699017228288?s=21
I agree. People seems to be blinded by how easily this will be gamed when you know exactly when justices will be forced out. Instead of a roll of a dice on chance deaths from age complications, we’ll get essentially permalocked seats for Democrat or Republican picks to a higher degree than we already do. Justices will likely never serve the full term and instead retire early when under favorable control of the other branches. The chance for a Scalia or Ginsburg swap will happen once in multiple centuries instead of almost every cycle.
Having a firm end date changes the risk calculation enormously to early retirement.
That footage was unfortunately lost due to corruption, hard drive failure, overwriting, cameras not on, pointing in right direction, glare, or low resolution.