2
faucipolice 2 points ago +5 / -3

She didn't need to exit the car.

How else do you move someone away from your car, do you propose the driver gets out so someone can hop in? Turn off the car, take the keys, get out, lock the car, or do you perhaps think that she just locks/unlocks the car. What about if they try to go for the door when she unlocks the car to grab her out? This was a heightened situation and anything could have happened. They could have also pulled a gun because they were trying to "run them over" and in "self defense" make a claim to shoot them. It is a state where CC is legal, right?

You can chop this in many ways and you picked the dumbest one to go with.

They could have driven away.

They were blocking the car from backing up in order to drive away.

Yes, I know the woman tried to block her, but that is in no way a reason to pull a gun.

How can they drive away if they are blocked.

Her life and the life of her child were not at risk at the time. You can't pull a gun on someone for yelling at you.

Oh I'm sorry, have you been watching anything that has been happening in recent time? Also have you never seen two women fight? It goes from 0 to 100 real quick, she felt threatened because she was striking the car, she got out of the vehicle in order to tell them to back up while drawing the gun in order to control the situation.

Did you notice no one was shot? Someone was striking her car and in the current climate usually ends up with a broken window and violence. Stop being so dishonest?

If you are going to carry, you need to know that pulling a gun is the absolute last resort. Period.

She wanted to leave and was prevented from doing so. What was she supposed to do, wait until she kindly moves? Did you actually see the video? She wasn't getting out of the way, she put herself in the way. She then decided to remain in the way of the car and decided to smack the car. They were trying to leave (your advice, remember?) and they prevented them from doing so. Do you propose they just get out of the car to yell at each other some more? I would absolutely there was a threat to her safety given the heightened situation. You can't just consider her wellbeing, you have to be considerate of the baby she is carrying. One punch or kick or she falls forward from being shoved. Do you propose she try to run for the glove box while they have a hold of her hair? Or perhaps did you want this to play out with the white man taking the gun and shooting the black assailant? Seriously, fuck you.

You people downvoting me fucking scare me. Have you had a concealed carry class? Do you take the huge responsibility of gun ownership seriously? I am licensed in Wisconsin to concealed carry. I will not pull my firearm unless my LIFE or my family's life is in danger. This lady was scared, but her LIFE was not in danger,

You seem to conveniently forget she's pregnant. We worry about what type of foods she should be eating and not drinking things that affect the baby. Yet we're going to see it as okay to put someone who is pregnant in to a potential violent situation, after they tried to leave?

You simply just don't understand what actually happened. Christ, she probably would have survived the situation in the long run but one punch when you're mad can severely damage the baby. I just think you've never actually seen a real fight and how they evolve.

2
faucipolice 2 points ago +2 / -0

Like https://joebiden.health? (Video changes every hour)

1
faucipolice 1 point ago +1 / -0

I get your point, what I'm saying is there are much better snippets to use from this exact same talk other than this one bit.

I understand where you're coming from and I simply disagree with the premise that this is a bombshell of a moment, I don't know why that is so hard for people to understand.

0
faucipolice 0 points ago +1 / -1

Fight zero context with zero context? Nah, I won't willingly subscribe to being ignorant in any situation, it doesn't help me.

Also if you notice I didn't say don't call him out on his shit but this is such a weak one to really pin him on.

2
faucipolice 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes any URL be banned but they run the risk of also hitting biden's own URLs if they're not careful. Why not promote some friendly fire on their behalf? Domains are cheap, just add a new one that redirects to others.

I saw this on a post:

The Historical Eradication Doomed Orwell Not Aforementioned Lazy Democrats .Win

0
faucipolice 0 points ago +1 / -1

That's not even remotely what I'm talking about and you know that. I could make a random account, edit the stupid HTML, take a fucking picture and post it here and censor the user for their "safety" and you'd believe it.

The issue is just how easy tweets are to fake, if you refuse to believe just how easy I recommend you learn about Chrome Devtools.

14
faucipolice 14 points ago +17 / -3

I think the context is that he forgot there were 2 "quick" questions.

Like yeah, it isn't great but there really isn't something that big.

2
faucipolice 2 points ago +2 / -0

Here's the reference done by Kalamath

If you note the "citation" is to a book that is not public.

It was also written by Bingham Hiram, Former United States Senator from Connecticut.

I like how Yale's history is disputed so instead of mentioning what was disputed it is instead made a 180 and instead of enforcing slave laws he was the one who freed them. All from a single book supposedly.

1
faucipolice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Police cars need to be equipped with a nearly deafeningly loud siren that essentially makes you unable to stand near the car.

As in, if you choose to stand near the car you will be permanently deafened.

2
faucipolice 2 points ago +2 / -0

I half wonder if some people at the NYT are trying to signal that these things are real and really try to push the narrative to almost help Trump.

Then again they did graduate with a gender studies degree

2
faucipolice 2 points ago +2 / -0

Quick, everyone rush to use this as the primary defense when someone dies.

1
faucipolice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Bitchute is such a ghetto website and their frontpage is uncurated shit. It basically incentivizes people not to use it when you're confronted with pedogate shit. You don't start off a platform with that.

1
faucipolice 1 point ago +1 / -0

I wish people would start spreading these around

Never got traction but the domains work identically and resolve correctly. Please start these if you want to bypass thedonald.win (or be creative with images)

1
faucipolice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Do people not realize that these apps require bots to function? Sure not every single person is a bot but there is a mix of real and fake profiles in order to entice and waste your "like" currency in order to coerce you to pay for it.

Some may be this shallow but definitely don't assume these people are real.

1
faucipolice 1 point ago +1 / -0

People are naive. Sometimes people need a good hard slap in the face to really see how much fear their constituents deal with.

5
faucipolice 5 points ago +6 / -1

I was gonna say... They look more like a man than a woman. Knowing Biden & Obama probably every "woman" is actually a man.

12
faucipolice 12 points ago +12 / -0

Crowder literally warned him too. Must be a slap in the face to watch himself blowing off the warnings so confidently...

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›