1
fegeline 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not if you do it at the Swedish embassy or at IKEA.

2
fegeline 2 points ago +2 / -0

Probably "Jenny", but since this was probably sent by a government developed system costing the tax payers billions every year, the letter "J" is not supported.

1
fegeline 1 point ago +1 / -0

The law of Jante, as the Swedes say.

"If I can't have nice things, then nobody should have nice things."

Stop the socialism before y'all end up in a commie block with just enough breadcrumbs to survive.

175
fegeline 175 points ago +177 / -2

There are third world countries who would redo an entire district election if as much as one single vote where shorted.

2
fegeline 2 points ago +2 / -0

Good point, but I just can't recall anything they would pump into the air via the cars exhaust systems. I'm aware of chem trails after aircraft and some chemicals sprayed directly from the ground or via industrial chimneys but never via cars.

Maybe you're thinking about how they split the diesel particles into smaller pieces. That is indeed dangerous, like asbestos the small particles get stuck in your lungs and new cells will grow over it. Old diesel cars might smell bad and might cause cough if you breathe in the smoke, but at least you'll be able to cough those larger particles up before they get stuck.

This is a problem in most modern diesel cars tho and nothing unique for Europe. I wonder if this might be the reason for the recent adblue hysteria. While adblue might be unpractical it does bind those small particles into crystals, assuming the system works properly.

And yea, the government lies about pretty much everything when it comes to the environment or people health.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
fegeline 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yep, and enough space for all the clowns in government.

1
fegeline 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well, if you own a farm, you could make your own E85. That's a big advantage.

I guess that's also why the government suddenly "forgot" about it, and are now pretending that it doesn't even exist. They don't like free stuff, when it comes from the nature.

2
fegeline 2 points ago +2 / -0

$5/gal is just the beginning, some places in Europe takes $7/gal and want to double it in just a few years. And that's not even pure gasoline, they mix in about 25% ethanol in it. 98 octane is pure tho but that's already $9/gal.

10
fegeline 10 points ago +10 / -0

Nah that was Volkswagen, those cars weren't more toxic than any older car. Except for the monkeys they put in cages to test if they would survive the emissions. The only chemical they add is adblue (bull piss), same as they put in big rigs to clean emissions.

It's harmless but extremely unpractical because you need a separate tank for that, and that tank must always be between 10-30 degrees C, if it gets even hotter or colder the liquid freeze and destroys the engine. Best case scenario you got a $10,000 reparation.

4
fegeline 4 points ago +4 / -0

To be fair, Chernobyl was in fact worst case scenario, not only did the situation escalate but because of Soviet socialism they didn't bother to do much about it until plants over in western Europe reported high doses of radiation in the air and it was obvious what was going on.

Passive cooling as safety measure seems like a great way to avoid meltdowns, Europe also doesn't have flood waves or earthquakes so it shouldn't be possible to repeat the Fukushima incident either.

There's no reason to not build more nuclear power in Europe.

9
fegeline 9 points ago +9 / -0

People dont seem to realize how far north Europe actually is. It doesn't take more than a tiny change in the ocean streams or a change in the wind direction and suddenly it's just as cold as Siberia.

8
fegeline 8 points ago +8 / -0

Technically not, but on the other hand you'd get massive amounts of energy for a very low amount of fuel. The fuel still needs to be mined tho and that mining plus the concrete structures is the only environmentally harmful aspect with nuclear power.

The exception would be to have socialists operate it, like we saw with Chernobyl. Or using nuclear power in areas prone to have regular earthquakes, like the Japanese do.

Europe is a very stable continent with a low amount of natural disasters or extreme weather which makes it perfect for nuclear power. But ironically the politicians want to "go green" and replace it all with wind energy, which is a total shame because Europe still has enough stored uranium to power the whole continent with nuclear power for at least 200 years ahead.

5
fegeline 5 points ago +5 / -0

Absolutely true, lefties are in fact miserable, but at the same time too lazy to work their way up. So instead they demand a strong government who can pull down others to their level.

8
fegeline 8 points ago +8 / -0

Which is a bit ironic, because at the same time the can see the evilness in the national socialistic ideology, even tho all the German soldiers in the 30's had the symbol of peace (the swastika) on their uniform.

2
fegeline 2 points ago +2 / -0

Better archive the Wikipedia page about Shale oil before the commies nuke it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shale_oil. Funny thing about that is that it where commonly used during WW2 in Europe, a time when the environment wasn't invented yet so it typically resulted in a big oily mountain of rocks that still exist today, and are still burning inside.

But nevertheless it's real actual oil, just a few feet below the surface and available in many places. With modern technology it could easily be extracted, but the government fear cheap energy for the people.

2
fegeline 2 points ago +2 / -0

Has been tried over in Europe numerous times, always ended up with 100% women in the workplace, cheered by local politicians claiming it's finally "justice" followed by mass resignations because women can be real bitches towards each others at work.

1
fegeline 1 point ago +2 / -1

Might be the only honest "center" leftist tho. Most socialists pretend to be liberals so they can attack all directions, label everyone who disagree with them an extremist. And the sheep tends to fall for it sadly.

2
fegeline 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sounds a bit like various bonus systems many stores has for it's "members", or the tickets you use to access mass transit, movie theaters or the circus (no not the government, the actual circus).

Where you get points, and those points can then be exchanged for gods and services. It's a type of decentralization and will probably continue to be allowed unless the government can convince people it's "dangerous" somehow.

These exist both in digital and physical form, centralized as well as decentralized. Ethereum has tokens too, BAT for instance

3
fegeline 3 points ago +3 / -0

Alright, trying to explain as good as I can :)

The exchange (Coinbase, Binance, Kraken etc) works like a bank, but with a more modern and secure website instead of the 90's crap most old banks use. The exchange is from where you order the card, and the exchange will hold major FIAT currencies such as USD, EUR, GBP and similar and various cryptocurrencies for you (Bitcoin, Ethereum, Monero.. and stable coins like DAI). And most important, let you exchange between these for a small fee, typically $0.1 or 0.xx%.

The wallet, is basically a client side interface. It can be a client tool for a command line, a desktop application, a html5 script to run locally in your browser, a mobile app, a piece of paper or basically anything. Your coins are stored on the blockchain, a decentralized and distributed database of transactions.

The only thing you need is a key pair, a public key to receive and view transactions, and a private key to spend. A private key can have multiple public keys connected to it which allows you to avoid being tracked.

A key, (public or private) is just a very very big number, like 2^250 expressed on hexadecimal form, this makes it easy to hide in any creative way you want. So basically:

  • Exchange: Modern semi based bank that allows multiple currencies, crypto and exchanges
  • Wallet: Management interface in any shape or form, this gives you full control over your holdings on chain, allowing you to pay who you want, whenever you want, while giving Biden the finger, without consequences.
1
fegeline 1 point ago +1 / -0

Learning the hard way, there's no better way to remember. Trust me, you'd never take that class again.

3
fegeline 3 points ago +3 / -0

It doesn't matter since their machines can only do SHA256. They're leading the SHA256 mining market, an algorithm that is literally only used by Bitcoin, using machines that can literally only do SHA256. We're talking about billions of dollars invested in these facilities.

If they even thought for a second about censorship or trying to manipulate the chain, the rest of the world would instantly fuck off and move over to a different algorithm. Then China would sit their with their own abandoned version of Bitcoin, and specifically designed hardware chips for billions which are now worthless.

3
fegeline 3 points ago +3 / -0

First, they can take down the internet

Yea they could, but if they did literally nothing in this digitized world would work, and we'd all have bigger things to worry about than currency. This is why I hold ammo and canned food too.

Second, gold and silver are fine, but any coinage will do. Peer-to-peer purchases boost local economies, but pay platforms and clearing houses for alt-currencies can be easily built. We already do this with our fiat currency.

FIAT is just a way to centralize gold in order to scam you, in the end you'll only have a pile of worthless paper, while the globalists have your precious metals. Just use the gold or silver coins directly if you want physical mediums of exchange. Trusting fiat is just retarded.

Third, you might want to read some of the quantum computer news coming out of China.

You seem to mix up quantum computers with ASIC miners for SHA256, it's not the same thing, just chips designed for very specific tasks, and yea if you do use SHA256 to "secure" your passwords, then you're fucked since long ago. Quantum computers ain't magic, I've studied them for a long time.

Forth, if you are doing anything illegal on TOR, or think it is anonymous

Back doors in a open source system? that's just as stupid as thinking Dominion is trustworthy despite using proprietary code. It's true that NSA have contributed a lot to the TOR project and some of it's encryption algorithms.

That doesn't mean they get any magic back doors. Once again, $1000 (cash or gold by mail), if you show me where these backdoor are and how to use them. It should be easy money for you. https://github.com/TheTorProject

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›