1
flashersenpai 1 point ago +1 / -0

maybe, but they're politicians they're always looking for an excuse to do what they want to begin with

1
flashersenpai 1 point ago +1 / -0

eh it won't be dominion it'll be change of address, signature matches, etc

4
flashersenpai 4 points ago +4 / -0

i don't know if he's ourguy but he's damn good

8
flashersenpai 8 points ago +8 / -0

lol this guy is taking a torch to the last hearing good job

3
flashersenpai 3 points ago +3 / -0

Well at least the senate committee looks like they have a spine.

3
flashersenpai 3 points ago +3 / -0

probably just general use term

4
flashersenpai 4 points ago +4 / -0

you're better off watching the closing comments on their reactions, they didn't "react" as much in the moment just asking questions

the camera footage was the first witness

11
flashersenpai 11 points ago +11 / -0

Yo these guys seem like they actually want to get something done holy shit

14
flashersenpai 14 points ago +14 / -0

YO THIS DUDE SAID FUCKIN' DO THE ELECTION AGAIN

YOOOOOOO

2
flashersenpai 2 points ago +2 / -0

lol yeah she was doing okay until then, just a really bitchy tone

3
flashersenpai 3 points ago +3 / -0

I like ya GOOCH but keep the FBI and DOJ out of it. They're shit. And piss.

1
flashersenpai 1 point ago +1 / -0

Pretty good. The last part is just the dem lady REEEEEE as a courtesy by the leader of the committee.

1
flashersenpai 1 point ago +1 / -0

she's a minority rep so they're giving her some time to cry at the end

5
flashersenpai 5 points ago +5 / -0

they definitely seem different than after the first hearing

11
flashersenpai 11 points ago +13 / -2

lol this guys going a bit off topic as much as I like him

2
flashersenpai 2 points ago +2 / -0

he's only asked 2 questions and both were good

6
flashersenpai 6 points ago +6 / -0

lol that's an interesting observation

2
flashersenpai 2 points ago +2 / -0

don't get too high and mighty could be your state too...

(but yeah you're right, at the very least totally incompetent)

1
flashersenpai 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think it was a real question. He wanted to know if the courts could stop the legis from picking electors in case of a ruling opposing the evidence.

2
flashersenpai 2 points ago +2 / -0

hahaha i was thinking the same thing

2
flashersenpai 2 points ago +2 / -0

well "anyone" can run for office so...

1
flashersenpai 1 point ago +1 / -0

to be fair i don't think many people have had to look into this specific issue

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›