1
freedom2520 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's 5 bit at most

4
freedom2520 4 points ago +4 / -0

Why can't a president run on terminating EVERYONE in civil government? They'll all be treated equally so there can be no wrongful termination. Just do one agency at a time on a schedule so that that other agencies can pick up the slack while they rehire

3
freedom2520 3 points ago +3 / -0

Watch Rudy's documentary on Netflix about the NY mob getting taken down in the 90s and explain how they were different than the DNC mob today

9
freedom2520 9 points ago +9 / -0

Did you not see the videos of police opening up the barricades themselves and arm waving them to come in? There was no beach, IT WAS AN INVITATION

2
freedom2520 2 points ago +2 / -0

Somebody who still has a Twitter get on there and start redpilling that @

This is where we start taking the country back, by breaking through the npc programming

2
freedom2520 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is why medieval systems of justice allowed for brutal executions.

A necessary evil to keep idiots like these from taking over the population.

2
freedom2520 2 points ago +2 / -0

Likely is the operative word here.

It's not unknown and separate, these politicians are 99-.01 dishonest and just follow the carrots in front of them. So this vote reveals a lot in that only 5 Republicans were willing to go against Rand. This means that when the final vote comes, it will be highly unlikely 17 will vote to convict.

21
freedom2520 21 points ago +21 / -0

Right... So in fact, 5 Republicans did in fact vote IN FAVOR of Impeachment (by way of shutting down Paul's obstruction).

But the headline is reading into the votes to infer that ONLY 5 Republicans will vote to convict, when 17 will be needed.

So it's not DOA, there will be a trial, etc. It's just that in the final vote, there is unlikely to be a conviction.

155
freedom2520 155 points ago +161 / -6

No, 5 or more democrats voted AGAINST considering the point of order any further... That's what "table" means... Means kill it

Edit: This was a motion by Rand Paul.

So in fact, 5 Republicans did vote IN FAVOR of Impeachment (by way of shutting down Paul's obstruction).

But the headline is reading into the votes to infer that ONLY 5 Republicans will vote to convict, when 17 will be needed.

So it's not DOA, there will be a trial, etc. It's just that in the final vote, there is unlikely to be a conviction.

6
freedom2520 6 points ago +7 / -1

This is nothing but a victory lap for them, but covid is NOT going away -- they will ramp things back up after the new "40% more deadly" strain starts making the rounds.

1
freedom2520 1 point ago +1 / -0

How do we know this isn't a compromised honeypot?

view more: Next ›