1
freedom2520 1 point ago +1 / -0

To the dumbocrat cunt saying "This has already been debunked in court":

NO IT HASN'T. THOSE CASES WERE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF STANDING, WHICH MEANS NO EVIDENCE WAS CONSIDERED. THE COURT JUST SAID "It's either: you're the wrong person to sue, you're sueing the wrong person, or we're the wrong court to hear this case"

NOTHING BUT YOUR DUMBASS STATEMENT HAS BEEN DEBUNKED

1
freedom2520 1 point ago +1 / -0

Remember, Q includes a lot of crowdsourced information, which means it is susceptible to bad actors inserting disinfo into the chain. This is actually by design to protect the movement from telegraphing.

So much of the info at the time of dissemination is in an unfalsifiable position, until such time passes and current events happen that definitively proves true or false. The key then is to look for this such info comprehensively and connect those dots.

6
freedom2520 6 points ago +6 / -0

It was SO OBVIOUS when all these stories came out of NOWHERE in the summer slamming the USPS as being "held up" by Trump to affect the election that they were doing the preparations needed to pull off the coup.

Military needs to go in and hold tribunals for everyone in USPS and hold the dirty ones accountantable for treason.

1
freedom2520 1 point ago +1 / -0

It was SO OBVIOUS when all these stories came out of NOWHERE in the summer slamming the USPS as being "held up" by Trump to affect the election that they were doing the preparations needed to pull off the coup.

Military needs to go in and hold tribunals for everyone in USPS and hold the dirty ones accountantable for treason.

2
freedom2520 2 points ago +2 / -0

Don't even boost this. The best thing that can happen is this man arrested and face a trial -- until then, the more we boost, the more incentive we give to them to take him out and frame us for it

10
freedom2520 10 points ago +10 / -0

Because they went with some BS that there "might" be a couple hour window before you start exhibiting symptoms where you "might" be able to spread...

Just no hard evidence or studies at all.

1
freedom2520 1 point ago +1 / -0

What I'm wondering if they could claim there were two production runs of ballot printing, perhaps due to discovering after high demand for mail in ballots, they needed to order more (that's the cover). The "fakes" they would say to be from the second run. If there is only Indeed two different types of ballots found, could this argument be countered?

1
freedom2520 1 point ago +1 / -0

In court, would the opposition try and argue that these were just original ballots printed from a different stock?

by oxygen
3
freedom2520 3 points ago +3 / -0

This mailbox is full and cannot accept messages

by iancarr
4
freedom2520 4 points ago +4 / -0

Get Trump to RETWEET THIS!!

1
freedom2520 1 point ago +1 / -0

No one might care, but he might.

He might think it's a humiliation he can't suffer. He might have an image of himself as being viewed as a "perfect model citizen" and that he couldn't be viewed that way if it were exposed.

4
freedom2520 4 points ago +4 / -0

Good for SCOTUS. They would have just been put back into red zone with BS justification after case dismissed.

7
freedom2520 7 points ago +7 / -0

Barnes is too sure of things that are being proven factually wrong.

It's just his opinion, but having the right opinion matters and he's proving himself to have the wrong on quite a bit.

Another one is his proclamations that Sidney has gone too far by saying it's "easily provable" that Dominion fraud hasn't happened in all states, simply because Dominion isn't operating in all 50. But Sidney's point was that the FRAUD is taking place using dominion method, regardless of the actual company involved, because votes go to Scytl (which he also dismissed)

He thinks he's so sure he's identified misinformation, but he falls prey to the classic strawman argument fallacy where he uses one example of something proven to be misinformation to discredit a vast swath of other information that he has mistakenly identified to be part and parcel the same thing as the misinfo.

Like with QAnon, it is undeniably a military info op, and there are things coming out of it that only insiders could know. Because of its decentralized nature, there will be attempts to compromise it with false info... This means that not everything coming out is 'correct' but also the assuming the reverse that it is all misinfo out of hand would be a fallacy.

1
freedom2520 1 point ago +1 / -0

YES!!! FINALLY SOME WINNING FROM SCOTUS!!! I HAVE WAITED MY WHOLE LIFE FOR THIS!!

Poor Catholics. Your pope is hopelessly compromised. Fuck these globalist billionaires. They go off and compromise literally EVERYONE in power with their money.

The problem with these billionaires is they've surpassed the American dream. That's too limited for them. They have the globalist dream. We need to take their money away from them by force, not because they "made too much" or "it's not fair" like the traditional communist would say, but because they are enemies of the state, actively in engaging in treason against the will of the people.

It's not how big your account is, it's how you use it.

3
freedom2520 3 points ago +3 / -0

He's on Powell's team. So... Depends on who's side your on. If you are here, you better be on his side.

12
freedom2520 12 points ago +12 / -0

This is the biggest poser of a doctor in existence.

People like him are reasons why violent executions existed centuries ago, and why they need to be brought back. People who massively profit from eschewing honor need to die a bloody violent death.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›