Did they say what exactly happened? The news reports said he got into his car and drove away, but he has to have done more than that to get shot.
Is this going to be one of those incidents where they wait a couple of months before releasing the bodycam footage that exonerates the officers?
This is a big mistake the legal system makes. When there's a violent mob, everyone in the mob should be fair game for shooting in self-defense. If you see the people near you are violent, you should get away if you value your safety.
This principle is what enables riots. You have 100 people just standing there, while violent people go in and out of the mob to take shots at police. The people just standing there are accomplices as much as the people throwing rocks and fireworks at police, and should get no legal protection if they get injured or shot.
They already did, but Kyle Rittenhouse still has another year before his trial. That's why the Kyle Rittenhouse trial is so important. It's about someone using a gun to defend themselves from a violent mob, which should be a clearcut situation where lethal force is allowed.
For a gun grab, if you plan to fight to the end, you probably need a motion detecting camera and a dog to warn you. This will almost definitely lead to you getting killed.
Also for a gun grab, have a ghost gun that uses the same ammo as your legal gun. Then you can turn over your legal gun and some ammo when they do the grab.
Growing your own food is really inefficient unless you have a lot of land.
Title is wrong, it should be "BLM protest leads to riot and looting as planned". The useful idiots come out to "nonviolently protest" and distract the police, while another group goes around looting and destroying property.
They really have the looting down to a science. They have a caravan of cars that goes from one target to the next. For example, in a drugstore, the street value of the drugs inside is $1M-$2M (the painkillers and opiods).
The Senate and Electoral College were two of the key compromises in the original Constitution. They gave smaller states assurances that the more populous states couldn't just run over them.
There is a place where more populous states get representation equal to population, that's the House of Representatives.
Police will kill over a parking ticket, but do nothing when an angry mob burns down a city.
On the other hand, the guy should have just paid the ticket rather than escalating. If other groups are criticized for resisting arrest, this guy shouldn't do it also.
It's because Trump was used to doing private sector real estate jobs, where you only need a team of 5-10 people you trust to get things done. In government, a President needs to appoint a lot of people. He didn't have enough people he'd worked with before and trusted, so he was forced to take recommendations from untrustworthy people.
I heard some LEOs say, if you kill someone who breaks into your home, they'll just quietly remove the body.
If you shoot someone and they survive, they can go public with their fake version of what happened, and now you can get sued or even prosecuted.
There's another big difference. 2020 was an election year. That's a reason for them to NOT riot.
I have no idea what's going to happen. The likely outcome will be some rioting especially in big democrat cities, and the police will be ordered to stand down and do nothing.
I don't see a path forward with progress, if one group controls the criminals in the streets, the politicians, the DAs, the courts, and the media.
The rioters are using classic bully tactics, going right up to the line where police would be allowed to use lethal force or charge them with a serious crime.