18
fskfsk 18 points ago +18 / -0

What happens now is, whenever police arrest someone, they start shouting "I can't breathe!" as loud is they can. This means police just ignore it when someone claims they "can't breathe".

1
fskfsk 1 point ago +1 / -0

The people in the suburbs would need to destroy some roads and bridges. Otherwise looters and refugees from the cities would overrun them.

2
fskfsk 2 points ago +2 / -0

Given that several members of the jury are members of BLM/Antifa, the best Chauvin can get is a hung jury.

1
fskfsk 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you don't come prepared for a fight, you're going to get beaten or get your car ruined.

1
fskfsk 1 point ago +1 / -0

If this is a real thing and not a troll, Antifa is going to show up to start trouble.

9
fskfsk 9 points ago +9 / -0

Why would they need to pack the Supreme Court when the Supreme Court already caved for the 2020 election?

64
fskfsk 64 points ago +65 / -1

If the juror knows they can get a $10M book deal if they vote guilty, and get there home burned down if they vote not guilty, then how is a fair trial possible?

2
fskfsk 2 points ago +2 / -0

The main argument AGAINST offshoring is that the offshore vendor becomes a competitor.

Example: You make a product in the USA for $10 and sell it for $20. You find an offshore vendor who will make it for $5. Great! Now you make it for $5 and sell it for $20. In 2 years, another offshore firm is selling a copy for $4.

5
fskfsk 5 points ago +5 / -0

You also would need the legal system to have their back, to not frivolously charge them with a crime for defending their property, homes, and businesses.

4
fskfsk 4 points ago +4 / -0

When I hear "militia", I really think of patriots, not communist terrorists. "Militia" probably is the wrong word.

Antifa is really organized. They have a group of people going from city to city to riot, based on wherever some idiot got themselves killed by police. They have division of labor, bail funds, lawyer funds, DAs and politicians.

3
fskfsk 3 points ago +3 / -0

BLM occupies government building - one or two people arrested, released without charges.

Conservatives occupy government building - one person shot by police, many have their lives ruined with aggressive prosecution

1
fskfsk 1 point ago +1 / -0

Radical footsoldiers operate best on feelings and emotions. Clinton just didn’t do it for them… One by one the traditional democrat left was wiped out by the more extreme radical leftists.

So basically, they didn't fraud the election for Clinton in 2016, because the extreme left was pissed off at her? That's an interesting take, they let Trump win to get revenge on Clinton.

2
fskfsk 2 points ago +2 / -0

That means the Atlanta shooter probably isn't a conservative, probably a disgruntled leftist.

4
fskfsk 4 points ago +4 / -0

It's all hipsters copying each other.

Why should you object to other people carrying around "I am an idiot!" signs?

2
fskfsk 2 points ago +2 / -0

If you're the type of person who stubbornly tells the truth, you won't have a long career as a journalist. There are more people who want to be journalists than there are available jobs, so they can be picky and only hire the best liars.

8
fskfsk 8 points ago +8 / -0

Really, when a crowd tries to "dearrest" someone like that, the policemen should be defending themselves with live ammunition.

If the police really were as evil as Antifa/BLM says, they wouldn't feel so comfortable resisting arrest, throwing things at them, and mob rushing them.

2
fskfsk 2 points ago +2 / -0

Also, "-phobia" means IRRATIONAL fear. If you have logical reasons, it isn't phobia.

I.e., "trannies in women's bathrooms and women's sports is unfair to biological women" isn't transphobia, it's a logical criticism.

3
fskfsk 3 points ago +3 / -0

The funny part is that, if you get one of those new "smart TVs", it can be traced back to you after you steal it, once you hook it up to the Internet.

1
fskfsk 1 point ago +1 / -0

Once you make a party, with formal rules, and start having success, the rats will still join. Look at what happened to Ross Perot's party in 2000.

OK, you make a 3rd party and it's successful. What prevents all the RINOs from just joining your new party?

1
fskfsk 1 point ago +1 / -0

As a practical matter, defeating RINOs in primaries is a lot easier than starting a 3rd party.

Suppose there is a district that is 60% Republican and 40% Democrat. If you get 51% of the vote in the Republican primary, your candidate wins. (assuming the RINO you beat in the primary doesn't throw a tantrum and run as an independent and split the Republican vote)

Suppose you run as a 3rd party candidate, with 51% support from Republicans and 0% support from democrats. In the general election, the Democrat then wins with 40% of the vote. (with the vote being 40%/30.1%/29.9%)

If you start a 3rd party, you're just throwing elections to Democrats.

4
fskfsk 4 points ago +4 / -0

Here's the problem with microagressions: People are jerks to each other all the time.

White person is rude to white person, he'll think "What a jerk!"

White person is rude to minority, he'll think "Microaggression! Racism!"

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›