2
fskfsk 2 points ago +2 / -0

I wouldn't go all-in on riots. Now that the election year is over, the riots don't serve much of a purpose anymore. Look for rioting to heat up again in 2024.

2
fskfsk 2 points ago +2 / -0

There might be no riots for a straight guilty verdict.

There probably will be a riot after a manslaughter-only conviction or hung jury or acquittal.

by gamepwn
0
fskfsk 0 points ago +1 / -1

That video doesn't prove they are cops or even doing anything illegal. They're standing there, a woman is screaming at them, and they knock someone's camera out of their hand.

4
fskfsk 4 points ago +4 / -0

Oh boy, that article has another HUGE error. The NBA didn't boycott playoff games in protest of the Jacob Blake shooting. Their boycott was the day after Kyle Rittenhouse shot 3 people in self-defense.

The NBA players were totally fine playing the day after Jacob Blake got shot.

The NBA was not stopping games in protest of Jacob Blake, but rather in protest of Kyle Rittenhouse. That's why I stopped watching the NBA.

2
fskfsk 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, when/if they retake the House in 2022 (fraud permitting), they should strip all the radical Ds of their committee assignments just like they did to MG.

2
fskfsk 2 points ago +2 / -0

They don't have the numbers. If 20-50 people start getting killed at each riot, they run out of thugs FAST.

Right now, rioters and looters have no skin in the game. They don't fear getting shot by police or individuals defending themselves. They don't fear getting arrested, because the charges are usually dropped by Soros DAs.

The police still outnumber the rioters. They're also better equipped and organized. The tactics of the rioters and looters only work because the police were ordered to stand down, and any individual who defends themselves is prosecuted.

3
fskfsk 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's also that Antifa ships thousands of people from one flame area to another. They have riot teams that go from city to city.

4
fskfsk 4 points ago +4 / -0

Someone in the crowd probably called for the police. For people who hate police, they sure are quick to call for help.

8
fskfsk 8 points ago +8 / -0

Can you even believe "they voted for this"? It could just be fraud and the people really didn't vote for it. On the other hand, never underestimate people's stupidity.

I'm still shocked Republicans aren't winning these Democrat dumps by running on a law and order platform.

2
fskfsk 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's because they keep saying "claimed by boy had a gun on him" rather than "boy had a gun on him". By repeatedly saying "claimed", they reinforce the idea that anyone who says the boy had a gun is a liar.

2
fskfsk 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is the big failure of democracy. Even if you are 1000x more informed than most people, you still get just one vote.

20
fskfsk 20 points ago +20 / -0

So they're going to prosecute Maxine Waters for inciting murder? When does her impeachment trial start?

3
fskfsk 3 points ago +3 / -0

Can you imagine an America where angry mobs burn down cities and nobody does anything to stop it? Those might be the only two choices left, burn down the country, or start stacking corpses.

20
fskfsk 20 points ago +20 / -0

Once they let the national guard and police start using lethal force, it will end fast.

That's the only way I see this ending, changing the use of force guidelines so that police can use live ammunition during rioting and looting.

23
fskfsk 23 points ago +24 / -1

This is why some people say dictators make better rulers than democracies.

Putin knows he's going to be in charge for as long as he wants, and there's a near certainty his successor will be his family or someone he picked. This means Putin can make plans for the next 20-50 years. Also, it's near-impossible to bribe Putin, since the value of "all of Russia" is worth more than any possible bribe.

In a democracy, politicians have no incentive to plan ahead past the next election. They also can be bribed for a couple million dollars to give out favors worth billions, or even be bribed to ruin their own country.

2
fskfsk 2 points ago +2 / -0

Some should look up all the DA races and see if any Soros candidates are running.

3
fskfsk 3 points ago +3 / -0

She's in a safe Democrat district and has enough name recognition that clueless people will vote for her. No point running a Republican in her district. The best hope to get rid of her is to find someone reasonable to run as a Democrat against her in the primary, but even that probably is a wasted effort.

5
fskfsk 5 points ago +5 / -0

No judge would have the balls to risk throwing out a guilty verdict on appeal. Any judge who did that would have a FedEx driver murder his family.

8
fskfsk 8 points ago +8 / -0

She's surrounded by like 10 armed guards. Every politician who demands gun cuntrol should give up their armed guards.

1
fskfsk 1 point ago +1 / -0

What's the point of bringing out military gear if you're just going to stand there when rioters throw rocks and fireworks at you?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›