The video is back. Huge amount of dislikes, including mine. I think they gave trying to fix it
This why people don't believe us.
You are putting Obama's birth certificate in question with the same tone as the 2020 election steal.There is nothing that proves Obama wasn't born in the US and there is plenty of evidence of the steal. But when you put those two thing on the same level it looks bad for our side. No one will take the red pill if that means they have to believe Obama was from Kenya.
Does anybody know where the public can find the actual documents?
Not arguing with the sentiment or the message but isn't comparing injuries and deaths little unfair considering one lasted several hours vs 7 months?
Different services dropped them simultaneously (text service, lawyers, domain etc.). Azure, digital ocean, google (other cloud providers) didn't drop them since they didn't have a contract with parler.
Now I assume they approached those services today and they said no, that would constitute as anti trust but that would mean they need to fill lawsuit against all of them. And even then their lawyers could present cases of illegal activity on parler coupled with parler's CEO statements that they will not moderate free speech is enough for an argument of denying a service based on each company respective terms.
A lot of personal info is stored on those servers. It is one thing for the alphabet agencies to have access to the but giving it to the Russians doesn't sit well with me. Especially if high lever politicians are using it.
I support parler but they have no standing. Even the fairest court wouldn't entertain this law suit. Parler agreed to the terms of service, which say "We can terminate your service for any reason or no reason" and I doubt they had a contract that didn't have that clause in it. Parler does have some deep financial backing though
The economy was worse but the stock market was soaring since 2009. Doesn't help poor people though.
To be fair he called for peace after the we entered the capitol.
I never understood why the lower courts didn't look at the evidence. And make decisions on that evidence.
Like people said here. We don't know much. Maybe he didn't have enough evidence to prove that the steal happened.
Real talk. Wouldn't abolishing section 230 make website like twitter be responsible for the content of their users? Hence the censorship would be even greater than currently. More it will open the flood gates of everybody suing owners of other websites for content users post to i it, including possibly the .win forums? What stops a good lawyer suing .win owners for something I posted?
I don't trust them either. A lot of shills can be undercover.
For example their article about covid is full of lies
https://infogalactic.com/info/2019%E2%80%9320_coronavirus_pandemic
The fuck is the great reset, never heard of it?
Yep https://senatestockwatcher.com/ Use it daily for great stock tips