45
gbolcer 45 points ago +45 / -0

That's what they always do, pat themselves on the back and say they found one small human error and corrected it, but it's impossible that it happened anywhere else. It's so transparent.

3
gbolcer 3 points ago +3 / -0

Doing the work nobody else is brave enough to do!

3
gbolcer 3 points ago +3 / -0

...and they said they couldn't find $1.5B for a border wall. Where are all the rogue judges stopping this shit?

2
gbolcer 2 points ago +2 / -0

Oh, definitely the split ballots and non-down-ballot voting are big red flags.

1
gbolcer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, that was Jan 18th before the certification vote on Jan 20th. https://www.ntd.com/2000-national-guard-troops-in-dc-sworn-in-as-special-deputy-us-marshals_555158.html

Remember what they did in Portland? They had to deputize local law enforcement to prevent the revolving-door district attorney from sending rioters right back out on the street every single night. The mayor screamed bloody murder as it ruined their plan to sow as much discord as possible.

https://apnews.com/article/arrests-portland-racial-injustice-8f24de6f6e784a38409ed1f6c40aba7a

1
gbolcer 1 point ago +2 / -1

I understand the sentiment, but that's probably a good way to become a victim of swatting. https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Swatting

3
gbolcer 3 points ago +3 / -0

That's just because the NYT doesn't get enough people to buy into their invented reality, so they have to find other means to force people to believe what they do.

2
gbolcer 2 points ago +2 / -0

And if it did exist, they still would have suppressed the information about the virus in China. Technology isn't going to solve the organizational, political and corruption problems. Defunding the WHO was the best first step to reform.

1
gbolcer 1 point ago +1 / -0

I guess the more prove-ably wrong stuff they put in, the more you can impeach their credibility--yeah, I know as if they have any left.

1
gbolcer 1 point ago +1 / -0

According to an article posted on our forum, in an Oval Office meeting he briefly thought about taking himself out of the running so that they could run another non-fraudulent election without people thinking it was about his own personal gain. That's the part Democraps will never understand, they think he was trying to "remain in office" when he really was just trying to fix something so broken that if the general public truly understood the depths, they would be horrified.

1
gbolcer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not seeing that in the link. It's about macro-trends in seat flipping. Where did you see that?

1
gbolcer 1 point ago +1 / -0

I can't wait for all the hollyweird "It's an honor just to be nominated" start trying to leftsplain to us all how nominations aren't worth anything.

For the record, I think it's his sixth. I'll have to go track down the reference to the others.

https://www.newsmax.com/peterpry/emp-icbm-nato-testing/2020/10/26/id/993845/

Trump Doctrine Serbia/Kosovo Deal Bahrain-Israel Deal Deterring Nuclear War with North Korea US resilience against EMP Israel-UAE Deal

2
gbolcer 2 points ago +2 / -0

People who don't actually want to take delivery of it, but just want to trade it on paper in hopes that they can buy/sell it to someone else before they have to take delivery.

Interestingly enough, the 1958 Onion Futures Act was passed after two traders cornered the market in physical onions and onion-futures contracts listed on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange. Onions are still the only agricultural commodity in which the U.S. bans futures trading.

The guy who end up taking delivery of 50 boxes of onions figured out too late it was 50 railroad box cars and ended up crying just at the sight of them.

2
gbolcer 2 points ago +2 / -0

Don't ruin a good fanfic.

More seriously, I argued your exact point when the lefties were trying to use the same story how Pelosi was going to become President after a two-fer (or the Clinton one for that matter).

But to your analogy, Undercover CEO is actually a pretty good show.

3
gbolcer 3 points ago +3 / -0

Absolutely fair point. I think the author makes the argument that he use his influence in step-0. to recruit everyone he can to help uncover and fix election fraud in those states where it was obvious.

1
gbolcer 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think people are just arguing past each other. Some people are arguing very specific data and questions that need answering, others argue in the abstract. Yes, he could have done a better job, but I think the people around him weren't serving him well and the time to get it right worked against him. Now that the facts about the fraud are starting to trickle out, people are arguing that the clock has already ran out, though that's probably irrelevant.

1
gbolcer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Because the official data all the media used for the election shows vote decrements and vote leveling. Once is a mistake, dozens of times is malfeasance. The only way to figure out if the data matches the actual ballots is a forensic audit. Instead of allowing one, local politicians are actively blocking them which makes them look even more guilty. Even the audits that were allowed were simply "counting counterfeit money twice".

All clear?

https://static01.nyt.com/elections-assets/2020/data/api/2020-11-03/race-page/arizona/president.json

2
gbolcer 2 points ago +2 / -0

Robinhood was basically able to kill the rally. I was hoping Gamestop would use its newfound wealth to do some clever acquisitions to leap the business ahead with the support it was getting, but nothing seems to have fundamentally changed.

2
gbolcer 2 points ago +2 / -0

That lines up with the theory that everything democrats get in a tizzy about and accuse Republicans of doing is just to cover up their own crimes or political embarrassment.

2
gbolcer 2 points ago +2 / -0

https://govinfo.library.unt.edu/911/report/911Report.pdf

Official statement FWIW.
footnote 130 on pg. 499.

The cite a couple of sources to track down.

6
gbolcer 6 points ago +6 / -0

Last I saw there were still $11 billion worth of short interest, so this is just to help them from losing that on top of the already $19.5 billion they've lost.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›