2
ghjkl 2 points ago +2 / -0

did the law pass in OK?

5
ghjkl 5 points ago +5 / -0

https://www.cdc.gov/flu/pandemic-resources/2009-h1n1-pandemic.html surprisingly easy google search; also confirms 60.8 cases in US. meaning we literally have half as much cases and the death rate is less. dissenters would say lockdowns worked.

1
ghjkl 1 point ago +1 / -0

i agree with a lot of it, but i would like some source on "threatened union members with job loss" bit; its about as extreme as saying cohen was threatened.

1
ghjkl 1 point ago +1 / -0

the only recounts i've seen says they literally count less votes in all categories for the Rep candidate

1
ghjkl 1 point ago +1 / -0

it's more blatant this time around i agree, but given how election day is generally just any day of the week and not even a holiday, there is a real possibility that conservatives and moderates would be too busy spending the day making a living than to vote or do enough research to consider voting. election day should be a federal holiday imo

2
ghjkl 2 points ago +2 / -0

would rather have a bunker than "safe" room. if it just stops outside people from coming in, you only delay the inevitable. a bunker can stop bombs at least

1
ghjkl 1 point ago +1 / -0

yeah it's a big leap of faith to assume it works as intended, but mrna altering injections have some pretty good uses if done right imo, like maybe we can get cells to make vitamin C.

1
ghjkl 1 point ago +3 / -2

TBF if you were not going to die from CCP, the vaccine isnt gonna kill you any faster. my problem with it is why bother when according to them, it wont stop the CCP virus if you take it

1
ghjkl 1 point ago +1 / -0

this, pretty much but the anti's missed my point which is that unless someone tells you, a trap means you cant tell them apart thus destroys SS by design.

at the end of the day though, one should be going for who/what they love so sexuality is just a class system to divide us

disclaimer: i think the SS movement is brilliant though, it really flips the gender identity BS on it's head

1
ghjkl 1 point ago +3 / -2

with her case, she would be a "trap" which is the bane of SSGL groups, as unless she tells you or you get baited you really cant tell which would break their sexuality

2
ghjkl 2 points ago +2 / -0

and it still doesnt cover the eyes

2
ghjkl 2 points ago +2 / -0

grounds for impeachment.

until you realize it's never getting past house and senate.

even if it does somehow, it puts VP in charge, and if you impeach again for same grounds and somehow make it through that...

house leader becomes president and has to willingly call for special election.

Historic. for first waman president to make it with only 3% of less than half of all americans via fraud and displacement

3
ghjkl 3 points ago +3 / -0

that's a better interpretation of the law, it actually says within 10 years as well and seeing how the election laws work, thats like the same logic

2
ghjkl 2 points ago +2 / -0

it shows that hillary clinton is historically the least electable person.

1
ghjkl 1 point ago +1 / -0

inb4 dominion argues "of course our system allows cheating, its an election system after all and thats public knowledge but WE didnt manipulate the votes, thats defamation"

1
ghjkl 1 point ago +1 / -0

assuming it works out, all we will get AT BEST will be a harris presidency as it leads to an "impeachment" by congress and even that isnt by a fair jury.

dont get me wrong though, i would definitely want to see this force a special election but even that is as real as trump just keeps presidency

1
ghjkl 1 point ago +2 / -1

it the claim is just 2M overall, it does support those final goalposters with "OK there was election fraud but not enough to sway the election"

1
ghjkl 1 point ago +1 / -0

that robot's not wearing a mask

1
ghjkl 1 point ago +1 / -0

he's rich and expects to get what he's paid for but if laws dont work, who should really expect as much from contracts? its just weaker law used by people...

1
ghjkl 1 point ago +1 / -0

post-legalism: we will make laws that make this legal in the future and it will retroactively make this ok.

...except if you have literally any understanding of how laws work.

1
ghjkl 1 point ago +2 / -1

theres a tinfoil that her "death" is all controlled and staged from everyone involved. i think even if you prove she really died, you cant explain all the setup still. her life or death is irrelevant to the incident. for all we know, they could have taken her out afterwards as a useful idiot when they were done.

1
ghjkl 1 point ago +1 / -0

the dumb part isnt the trial, its the many people who believe the case. i tried to sarcastically say "oo he said fight for america" and it literally wooshed the libtard

view more: Next ›