2
ghost_of_aswartz 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't like the flair. Just being honest. Judge not lest ye be judged.

We can think it but shouldn't advertise it. Yes he gaslit us over the anthrax thing and that was done to bring in biological surveillance and tyranny.

Ok maybe you're right.

6
ghost_of_aswartz 6 points ago +6 / -0

Illuminati: "Demi, if you ever want to be 'a thing' in Hollywood again, you're going to have to spend 2 yrs as a mullet-headed tranny"

Demi Lovato: "Ok, sirs"

1
ghost_of_aswartz 1 point ago +1 / -0

you don't even need deepfakes

you need prostis' peeing in a bed and you change the timestamp

it's all digital, it can be manipulated. then you need a chain of corrupted people to rubber stamp and certify it

that's all you need

corrputed people making false claims and validating it....this is what happens when mafias take over the entire system

0
ghost_of_aswartz 0 points ago +2 / -2

I like to imagine that guy behind the camera cumming all over my face constantly while making those noises. RRrrraaghha yeaarrrrrhrghhah

sorry i'm being a gay dickhole

2
ghost_of_aswartz 2 points ago +2 / -0

This needs to include that the constitution is the supreme law of the land; and that we have amendments against illegal 'search and seizure' -- and asking if someone has been vaccinated, or even inquiring into it by other means is an illegal search; and their body is their person, and their person is their property

One threshold question in the Fourth Amendment jurisprudence is whether a "search" has occurred. Initial Fourth Amendment case law hinged on a citizen's property rights—that is, when the government physically intrudes on "persons, houses, papers, or effects" for the purpose of obtaining information, a "search" within the original meaning of the Fourth Amendment has occurred.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution#Search

"Property rights' -- and it says "intrudes on PERSONS" -- what do you think "persons" means in this context. First of all, there is a comma. Secondly, there's no 'apostrophe'. Thus it is saying it intrudes on the plural of person. Thus its saying 'aggregate of person' meaning each individual person. Therefore meaning "person" in the singular. I'm being pedantic on purpose to illustrate a point.

Person is a subject and direct object here, so it's referring to the individual, which can be very safely inferred as a citizen, but not limited to a citizen--a human.

Humans have rights, but this document the constitution outlines CITIZENS rights given to each by way of each other (popular consent-- "WE THE PEOPLE... DO ORDAIN")

RIGHTS include PROPERTY, as it was stated before the bill of rights.

THUS, the 4th amendment protects against ANY inquiry into ('search') the PROPERTY RIGHTS OF A PERSON ("human"), INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THEIR BODY ITSELF ("bodily sovereignty") AND THEIR OWN PRIVATE INFORMATION ABOUT THE SAME ("medical status of their property which is their body").

QED

Note: HIPAA does still apply here; and in fact, it only strenghtens the 4th amendment.


Vaccine mandates also run afoul of the 14th amendment and due process, but i'm out of juice right now explaining how. I am quite sure you can figure it out.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution

3
ghost_of_aswartz 3 points ago +3 / -0

omg

that's even worse / better than the Dave Chapelle joke about 'beyond beef'

4
ghost_of_aswartz 4 points ago +4 / -0

More like

Stolen Vag-alor

2
ghost_of_aswartz 2 points ago +2 / -0

I clicked because I thought the image was of covid infectee blood color over time

2
ghost_of_aswartz 2 points ago +2 / -0

She's gay now

she had to wait 80 yrs to come out

-1
ghost_of_aswartz -1 points ago +1 / -2

That is fine. Let them. Everyone else will witness their destruction and shake their heads. It will become so completely obvious how brain damaged they are and people will stop listening to them and they will become as shunned as they have shunned us.

1
ghost_of_aswartz 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes, but like hiv, it can be injected (see: 'covid vaccine')

2
ghost_of_aswartz 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes he did. He stopped his hiv infection from becoming AIDS by injecting gold directly into his veins. Source: south park

1
ghost_of_aswartz 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's a decent point, however hiv is not easily spread and also it is a way weaker virus than influenza, colds, and viral pneumonia. It takes decades to kill not hours or days. It's also not airborn. Or sneezeborn.

It's also a real virus and not a blueprint without anyone but the authorities (edit: "allegedly") having an actual isolate sample; and that is why a live attenuated vaccine (ie: 'a vaccine') doesn't exist to my knowledge, otherwise the us vaccination rate would be higher, certainly, among the 'vaccine hesitant' (ie: the covid clod shot refusers)

1
ghost_of_aswartz 1 point ago +1 / -0

Only a sore winner would be such a loser to go to a group of the losers and brag about winning, especially when the winner cheated, and the losers know it and the winners know it.

1
ghost_of_aswartz 1 point ago +1 / -0

Only a sore winner would be such a loser to go to a group of the losers and brag about winning, especially when the winner cheated, and the losers know it and the winners know it.

view more: Next ›