My reasoning suggests that Assange is fucked, and that a pardon won't do him any good when he's not in US jurisdiction. He's not in a jurisdiction that the US can extract him from, and with the US ending, there are no reasonable jurisdictions left and won't be for the foreseeable future. You can write him a US pardon, but it just means he won't have the prospect of seeing the brief sunlight of extradition travel... ever. I guarantee Trump would have pardoned him from any US detention, but that's exactly why they've never released him to the US. You have to talk to, or invade, the sovereign nation that's holding him, not get a pardon from an outgoing president of some other random country in the world.
I thought Biden was just going to do a Max Headroom-style zoom call to get inaugurated, and the military is just guarding the TCL smartTV that broadcasts it to the empty streets of DC through miles of fencing and over fortified ramparts, with a few YouTube videos of famous people for 'legitimacy'.
But we have reached a point where we have replaced ourselves. Armies no longer need to be human, no longer need to be in the same place. One can rule and be sustained by machine, and the populace is optional. Now that we, the people, are obsolete and nothing but trouble, we can just be massively eradicated; the few who remain free to script their own paradise on the power and technology that we harvested.
Great comment. They do, they're steeped in it. They live in an entirely different universe where all of this makes perfect sense to them; where they are taking a stand against evil - they just lack the critical thinking skills to properly ascertain the truth of what's evil and instead do what the echo chamber says. That's the entire left, really. But the leaders, Pelosi and Dorsey and Zuck and Feinstein and more - they know the real truth and have chosen to be evil, and to lead the echo chambers of misguided leftists into an intentional 'righteous' tyranny.
Assange doesn't gain freedom with a pardon because he didn't get extradition, in fact he would just sink further into endless purgatory if he were no longer Wanted here. I'm sure Trump would have pardoned him if the moment had come for it to have actually had a positive effect.
The Alamo, TX speech discusses a peaceful transition of power, and 'the Biden Administration'. Current hopiums place the Trump Card a bit beyond the Inauguration (to complete the crime), although there's little concrete information as to how that might work.
There is tons of proof. Sane humans can see it and know it's real. Courts refuse to see it because they know it's real. If it was BS, it would be all over MSM - they would say 'Look at this BS, just look at it' - instead, they say 'nothing to see over there'.
No number is good. Wages don't matter. A free economy solves that entire problem by being self-correcting. However, when you inject minimum wages (and increase them), all you're doing is shifting everything to larger numbers. Nobody gains any real wealth because it self-corrects to inflated purchase pricing; but when you tax it, the government can pay its old debt (calculated in dollars) with new, less valuable dollars, and pretend that the economy is amazing. Problem is, they're always racking up more new debt, and will have to devalue the currency again a short while later. If the minimum wage went to $1000/hr today, milk would cost $600 a gallon by next week - you gain nothing because the dairy has to pay its workers. But the government and the stock market will show record 'gains'. Dems do it the fake way and cause bubbles; Trump rejected that and did it the real way, market freedom.
Impeaching Joe wouldn't suffice unless you were taking out Kamala and Nancy (and maybe more). Kamala would be president, get her out then it's Nancy. Nancy would rewrite the Constitution in an afternoon to stay in permanently. After that, maybe you can get an election.
However, any Biden impeachment effort fails because of Dem majority and RINO traitors. The evidence will never matter, it is political. And the only way to take out the politics and leverage evidence is by engaging military courts.
The evidence is too complicated for a short attention span. It makes shit sound-bytes. It's all legitimate but it's fucking boring and depressing and belongs in a legitimate court room. Now if only we had any of those...
No, a pardon literally decreases any chance that he goes anywhere but the hellhole they have him in. It would actually do harm at this point. It does nothing toward 'prying him to freedom'. And I said that Trump would pardon him if it were a beneficial act for Assange. I think Trump wants Assange free, but a pardon would only be a setback for that.
I did, and am, making the exact argument that declawing the US from being able to prosecute him is actually a bad idea. His prosecution here, even under Dem power, would be vastly better than his status quo.