0
ghostsage 0 points ago +1 / -1

They are just people, nothing more.

You have to be pretty gullible anymore to think Nancy didn't schedule this art project with them days or weeks in advance.

1
ghostsage 1 point ago +1 / -0

Biden can not be President. Trump will be President or there will no longer be a Constitutional republic upon this land, and thus no Presidency, no Congress, no coordinated states. The 'consent of the governed' agreement will have been broken.

I know it's frustrating, but I don't actually care if Lin Wood (who has gone batshit for truth) is lying. It would be great if it were truth and I think it's doing nothing to dilute Trump's efforts. But sure, Epstein could sort enough of the coup.

We only 'lost' by a few percent, Epstein evidence would remove enough players and change so much public awareness that it would definitely overturn the situation. The 'clown' isn't suggesting it, but he's insinuating it. Massive if true, more Epstein introduction for normies if untrue.

3
ghostsage 3 points ago +3 / -0

The democrats keep telling them they are worthless animals with no way out of abject poverty except welfare for the women and crime for the men, and the message is so pervasive that very few rise to challenge it.

4
ghostsage 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'm not willing to believe it. This is a red country with a few strategically placed traitors. They are stealing as much as they can, but it can only go so far. In 2016, it didn't go far enough. In 2018, the cheating carried them over the line because Trump wasn't on the ballot. And in 2020, they pulled every fuckery in the arsenal, weren't able to cheat enough but tried it anyway, got sloppy, blew cover, got caught. Right now, we're seeing just how strategically placed those traitors are - and that's not been a customarily careless effort on their part so far.

1
ghostsage 1 point ago +2 / -1

I find your lack of faith disturbing. I mean, we don't know. Who can still get this anxious in 2021 about not knowing? What did Barr do with the last year, eat chicken? Or did he orchestrate several massive worldwide child trafficking takedowns. Oh, and we just happened upon Ghislane chilling in a groovy jurisdiction. Nobody is now certain that Lin isn't BSing (or making a metaphor about documents, or Epstein-alikes that do exist), but it's no longer possible to be certain that Epstein died just like the MSM says and there's nothing more to the story. Time will certainly tell, and maybe it will be wild.

2
ghostsage 2 points ago +2 / -0

This. They had no choice at all, the party was dead if they didn't snatch power. They lost too many blacks, every woke policy was being rejected by America, and once Trump had mandate to MAGA 2021, they were going to be disassembled and probably arrested. They had to go full Hail Mary on the Steal. And they didn't have the juice, that's why they couldn't fake the downballot or get it done clean.

1
ghostsage 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well ignoring and disregarding the concept of race, as policy, is the whole point. Sure, you can't ignore or disregard the racism that is ongoing (like the consistent racism perpetuated by Democrats for as long as they have existed), but the goal is to dismantle that and then no longer regard race at all, just individuals. I'm not understanding your 'cost' outside of that.

0
ghostsage 0 points ago +1 / -1

We have to do it, though. Trump would alienate the 'eighty million' who aren't MAGA by doing that. In the real world, where the election clearly demonstrated his absolute mandate to MAGA, we could end COVID with a tweet. But because that mandate was so obscured by fraud, these things are too touchy for him alone to bulldoze like he should.

The cure for COVID is going to be massive groups of constituents collectively shoving their mayor's bootheel off of their neck, and then their county's bootheel, and then their state's. And that's also how you prove the 'eighty million' don't even exist.

4
ghostsage 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'm sure Trump is doing all he can, and telling us all he can. Until he calls The End, we shouldn't assume the end. Everything you're saying is true, but we do trust Trump, and as long as he's in it, we should let him work.

The key thing is: Trump will get us to the next step if he can. If he can't, it's because it was already too far gone before he went to battle. It's a no-win to squirm now; you can do it before everything was fucked years ago, or you can do it when Trump gives up - but now isn't the time.

1
ghostsage 1 point ago +1 / -0

All big production movies are deep, thoughtful things. People are assigned exacting roles from script to camera angle to set color. Each is a professional with a purpose, and that purpose is not to entertain you, but to make you pay money to be influenced, in a subtle way, in the time you're most vulnerable - the time when you've voluntarily suspended all of your attachment to reality, all of your critical thinking, and immersed yourself, open-minded, into a story they've crafted. When you say it's a 'popcorn movie', you admit that they were precisely successful; that you have no idea what they did. And they changed you, just a little bit; nothing noticeable; the long game; death by a thousand cuts. Slowly, subtly, they sculpt culture through entertainment.

The Weinsteins wanted you to see Django Unchained. Hollywood wanted you to see Django Unchained. China wanted you to see Django Unchained. And Django Unchained isn't alone. Awareness is the only antidote.

1
ghostsage 1 point ago +1 / -0

Consider that racism is division (and that the opposite is seeing humans as humans); this movie endeavored to differ and divide along racial lines in sweeping ways. It even went further, using broad strokes to show imbalanced virtue among blacks and lack of virtue among whites.

It was decidedly divisive, and applied a woke narrative skewed afar even from unfortunate historical truths, when you consider that Trump is a man who sees things like 'all Americans' without regard for races and colors, and who believes in a world where racism can be eradicated without homogenization.

1
ghostsage 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nah, that's a ridiculous attitude. Maybe this is a world where O'Keefe plays his part, and someone else (like non-corrupt DoJ and other law enforcement) play a different role. Trump is probably the closest we've seen to a superhero, but we need to stop looking for superheroes and each be a hero in our own way to right this world. O'Keefe is doing his heroism, and nothing less.

YOU, F.O.G., do yours. Rise to the top of the DoJ and follow through with these findings. The position calls for a person. Barr was a person, Sessions was a person, you're a person.

1
ghostsage 1 point ago +1 / -0

He's going to take a break as soon as someone shuts down his dishonesty. So then you might ask why no one has shut down his dishonesty.

But not knowing a) what information he has and b) whether or not the actors who might do him ill are neutered, the safer assumption might be that he a) knows something and b) isn't scared of them.

1
ghostsage 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's what you've been doing. That's how we got here.

2
ghostsage 2 points ago +2 / -0

Shredder trucks are even easier to see.

1
ghostsage 1 point ago +1 / -0

It does precisely matter that her parents were not citizens. They were not under sole jurisdiction of the US (Jamaica still had jurisdiction over them), so neither was she, so she is not 'natural born'. Citizen, yes, but not eligible for Presidency.

3
ghostsage 3 points ago +3 / -0

Walmart became a thriving national chain in the 1980s primarily due to Sam Walton's commitment to provide products that are MADE IN THE USA.

2
ghostsage 2 points ago +2 / -0

See, even what you're saying isn't very helpful because it doesn't delineate the fraud he's purporting. I think you attach data for all those big fancy numbers and give the committee a graph or whatever, but you testify: Last-name-Anomaly A suggests that, at Access-Point B, Actors C and/or D, manipulated E to cause outcome F, which can be verified by comparing datapoints G to datapoints H.

And I believe this could have been done clearly and accessibly within the time limit, and he has the info, but explaining/communicating doesn't seem to be his specialty.

3
ghostsage 3 points ago +3 / -0

But I mean, obviously these people aren't looking for homework, they wanted clear cases presented succinctly. Just seems like Piton could use a spokesperson to state the facts in a more layman-friendly way than what we saw. And mostly because other people meandered through their testimony all day and ate up the time with nonsense, tangents, and pleasantries.

13
ghostsage 13 points ago +14 / -1

Somebody get Piton a data-to-human translator. I mean, it was obvious he had brilliantly uncovered a trunkful of smoking guns but he sounded like a raving lunatic in there, and I think he communicated absolutely nothing of value to anyone listening.

1
ghostsage 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes, I think I can get this licked if I just nip it in the bud.

5
ghostsage 5 points ago +5 / -0

We have to shut it down. Just for a short while, so we don't overrun the system. You can stay home for two weeks and work on a really great spending bill. We're calling it '2 weeks to fatten the carve' and then everything will be back to normal and business as usual, but we'll have made a huge impact for those most vulnerable.

Say it with me now, just two weeks.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›