He does not say that he has the evidence. He has the key to decrypt it.
In other words, imagine you have a key to a safe. That doesn't mean you have the safe too.
If Biden takes the WH and has a Dem Senate, this country is completely dead.
If Trump wins and there's a Dem Senate, they can veto anything he tries to do.
Anything less than civil war, we need the Senate.
We don't need the Senate going to Democrats! Vote for them now, then vote them out later. Secure the Senate no matter what.
“So starting after Christmas, this is really going to blow up. Because the evidence that all these crooked television networks, newspapers, big tech, and the leadership of the Democratic Party, have been giving you is false. And you’re going to find that out all at once. It’s going to be very shocking to the country.” - Rudy Giuliani
Rudy said "after Christmas." If he meant Jan 6th, he should've said so, because it's been a lot of days after Christmas, and so far, nothing.
Very good points. But weeks ago he was volunteering to argue the case before the supreme court. Maybe he was waiting for justice via the courts, and this is a last chance approach.
He's insisting on exactly what we need. Someone to investigate the fraud, and then for the states to be able to change their electors.
This is what they did the last time this happened and it makes sense to demand that we do it again. The Supreme Court should've heard the evidence, but refused. So Cruz is demanding that 5 SC justices, 5 Senators and 5 Congressmen actually look at the evidence that you and I know exists.
If Cruz wanted to whitewash the fraud, why the hell would he even be asking for this?
If Cruz gets any say in the commission, he won't put RINOs on it. He's probably one of the few senators that even knows about the fraud. The average senator (and person) really doesn't know a fraction of what we know.
They just watch the talking heads with their mantras of "without evidence" and "baseless claims". Trump is going to show the joint session, and I think Cruz wants to make the evidence of fraud official. The courts won't even look at it, and dismiss the cases without looking at it.
I'd been asking myself for months why Cruz wasn't doing anything. Now he is since most of the court cases went nowhere.
They might work as a deterrent to future communists. I mean, Democrats.
I'm hoping Trump will be much more vicious in a second term since he won't have to worry about re-election.
Paul was the only senator besides Cruz testifying that election fraud happened. That's why I said he was only one of the two that we could count on. Whatever else he's done, I don't know. I haven't watched Fox News since the election.
But so far, the only bad thing I've heard him say is that the way to address election fraud is to enforce the laws "in the future." It's needs to be now. Not in the future.
If we're talking about a commission led by Ted Cruz, I don't think it will be a whitewash. Cruz is a patriot who hates leftists and does not want to see them in power.
Ted Cruz leads group of senators opposing electoral college certification
He already said he's going to vote to reject the electors.
How could you possibly be against auditing the votes in the battleground states and proving the fraud?
This is exactly what we've needed for two months and only Cruz or Paul would do such a thing, and now Cruz has done it.
This is nothing but good news, on both counts.
I'd love to see some Treason charges, convictions, and executions.
Here it is from another leftist source - YouTube:
Since it's a translation, I wonder if they just mean the Trump era, or Trump's time of being in office. He refers to the "time after Trump" which could be taken either way.
How about a direct link? See if this works:
lions sipping water in the dark
"the Black community" = Black people.
We should avoid using their BS phrases.
I'm gonna need a few more warnings. Mmkay?
A leftist vandalized two houses in neighboring cities.
What's the big reveal here?
I didn't say I believe him.
I think he should be providing proof rather than claims. Proof about Pence, and proof about Epstein, etc.
Clarifying that there's a difference between having an encryption key and the files that the key opens is not a statement of support or belief. It's a completely agnostic statement.
So, no, I don't want to buy a bridge.