Thanks.

It started in childhood when underachievers could only explain their failures by claiming something wasn't fair.

Then an authority figure stepped in to alter the natural order and enforce fairness.

Being losers by nature, they've continued to fail in some way their entire lives and are always looking for the ultimate authority figure (government) to enforce fairness, equality, etc., and to grant them victories and accomplishments they're incapable of earning.

Their long-term failures have filled them with self-hate which they can't face, so they project toward those who actually do achieve and believe in personal responsibility, rather than mandated equal outcomes.

This is why everything they "believe" is based on feelings and is devoid of logic, which allows them to change their position and have quadruple standards that can be changed instantly - just as quickly as their feelings can change.

P.S. I'm actually explaining leftists, rather than normies. To me, normies are the people who don't really get too much involved in anything and may be swayed by the leftist propaganda because they don't care enough to examine any issue and just want to be judged as being on the right side of things. So they'll go with what celebrities, friends, and HR reps indicate to them is the right side.

Tactically, I'd imagine they'd want to go for the peoples' guns first, which would make it a 4-letter agency first, the BATF.

McConnell is a cuck for even negotiating rules to an unconstitutional impeachment. I would say, "We can discuss impeachment if you're conceding that Trump won the election and the Chief Justice is going to preside, as the constitution requires. Otherwise, go fuck yourself."

It's not the QB on the other team that is saying this retarded shit. It's Twitter idiots. Someone said this, and they're all mindlessly repeating it without realizing that Brady didn't pick the date of the game. If Brady gave the win to the other team, that would be racist to the blacks on his own team. The other QB is half-white, so if his team had won, it would be half-racist of them.

This whole thing is stupidity multiplied by stupidity.

Anyway, both QBs are great athletes, and I just wanted to make it clear that Mahomes is not asking for the win due to "black history month". His own team fucked him out of the win.

P.S. The team that won is mostly black, and the team that lost is mostly black. Fuck all the idiot blacks on Twitter who can't see past their own race.

It's verifiably false that Biden didn't win.

Claiming he did is dangerous for everyone. Those people should be banned, starting with CNN, and all the way to Fox.

Not from Limbaugh.

Unnecessarily attributed to multiple celebrity authors.

Upvoted just for the description. :)

If this is another of those "statistical improbability" reports, it doesn't help.

The leftist answer to all of that is to claim that's how much America hated Trump.

We need evidence, and prosecution for those who committed election fraud, and for those who unconstitutionally violated the absentee ballot law with the bullshit "mail-in ballots" because of covid nonsense.

King, like many artists, is good at what he does, but that doesn't mean his head isn't up his ass when it comes to politics.

I stopped reading his books when he came out with his anti-gun ebook. Maybe he's gone downhill since then, but I can't deny he was great at writing, just like rock stars and actors who are great at what they do, but are retarded when it comes to life and policy in America.

Leftists are good artists because art is fabrication, which technically amounts to lying. Actors and Writers are professional liars if you think about it. They make something that is made up appear to be real/true.

Trump also gave to the Clintons and was personal friends with them, so that didn't bother me that Chris Ruddy did the same.

But this? This is bullshit.

When anyone talks about this as an attempted revolution by the far right, I ask, "Really? A revolution to overthrow the government, but no one thought to bring guns? So they just wandered around in the halls and picked up trash and stuff? Do you really believe that?"

You're right. I saw Jan 21 and didn't notice the 30. Thanks. . I guess we'll find out that the NYT or some other leftist outfit is biased against conservatives.

I would promote a better service by selling people on it's benefits and features. Not by critiquing obscure technical aspects of a popular alternative that the average layman wouldn't understand, especially when described in an abstract manner he can't sink his teeth into.

Are you a developer?

I tweeted recently, "Is it still okay to talk about blowing up the White House, or do we have different rules now?"

The next time I tried to access my account, Twitter informed me that certain features have been limited on my account and that I needed to prove I'm human, and provide my phone number.

I can't access my account until then, which means I'm blocked, and not merely experiencing limited features. Somehow, referencing Madonna's statement made them wonder if I'm a bot? I'm not buying it. And I'm not giving them my phone number.

Thanks for the explanation, but to my uninformed mind, it seems like this would be true of most platforms. To follow someone on Facebook, you need a Facebook account, To follow and DM on Twitter, you need to have a Twitter account, etc.

It sounds like you're protesting Gab over something common, while ignoring that they are technically the same as most other social media, while politically completely different.

I don't imagine this getting a lot of traction.

I don't think your comparison makes sense.

I don't migrate between hosts on the websites I visit, so not being able to migrate is not a loss.

And I don't think Gab is offering me a stolen product - which I'm using at no cost, so it doesn't compare to buying stolen property. At least not the way you've explained it.

I'm looking at it from a simple perspective. There are communists/marxists, and there are humans. You're telling me about vendor lock-in, and I have no idea what that means. But I'm pretty sure Torba ain't a communist.

I did, and didn't see a reason not to use Gab. Bait and switch money operation? If I'm not giving them money, how does that affect me?

I expected businesses to try to make money. I'm okay with that. It's a billion times better than Twitter or any other leftist own platform.

If they did, which I don't if they did or not, it would be because someone with more than a double-digit I.Q. would've realized that they are dead to the left and can never appease the left.

Ditching Trump and the Right was suicide. That was their only audience. The left hates Fox with a passion that they aren't about to dismiss.

If CNN starting broadcasting pro-Trump stuff, would any of us start watching CNN?

What is the reason for not using Gab?

I thought that was weird when I heard it on the news.

We have democracy in our Republic. I think he was just referring to that. He didn't say "our democracy" or "the".

Those fuckers.

I'm thinking of people I saw on Reddit talking about how they invested their savings, (sometimes just purchasing a fraction of one stock, and some investing a thousand or two) and they're sitting on a profit, but are willing to lose it all.

That is, assuming they're telling the truth. It is the internet, after all.

You can only do so much harm to billionaires. And it's been done. No sense in not taking your profit while you can. It's a win-win.

People are saying they'll hold until the end, which means some people are buying in right now at insane prices and plan to hold till the stock falls back down to where it started, which means they miss out on some massive profit just to "stick it to the man" long after he's been stuck and moved on already.

Set your stop-losses so you exit with a nice profit.