5
gnostic357 5 points ago +5 / -0

Awesome.

I can't afford specialty coffee, but I would definitely choose Stocking Mill in light of their statement over BRC and theirs. But I will continue to support their mission to help our veterans, with a bit of regret for their recent stupidity.

2
gnostic357 2 points ago +2 / -0

Diversity is our downfall. Utopian ideas always manage to create dystopias.

8
gnostic357 8 points ago +9 / -1

That's pretty stupid then. Those idiots are not their customer base. The company is named after the owner's service rifle, so they're clearly pro 2A.

I agree that they deserve censure for tucking away their balls. But that doesn't mean we have to act like lefties and turn rabidly against them. Like Tucker recently, they fucked up. But I'm not going to condemn allies for a single mistake.

Maybe they'll come to their senses and make a better statement.

4
gnostic357 4 points ago +10 / -6

I don't see what all the (stupid) rage is about.

They stated a fact. The company is not an advocate for anyone.

Then they went overboard and canceled their sponsorship for the Blaze podcaster.

That was dumb, but not treasonous. I'm not a customer, but those who are because they supported the cause of helping veterans would be stupid to withdraw their support. They're only hurting the veterans when they do that.

If you boycott every company that isn't an advocate for Kyle, then you'd have nothing to eat or drink.

3
gnostic357 3 points ago +6 / -3

What did they do, other than make clear that they don't advocate for Kyle, or anyone else, because their mission is supporting veterans?

3
gnostic357 3 points ago +3 / -0

That word is so dumb. But then so is latino and latina. These people have nothing to with Latin, which was the language of Rome.

by KNITS
-4
gnostic357 -4 points ago +5 / -9

True.

If they were trying to please such people, then they fucked up. But that doesn't make them enemies.

I think people ought to be a little more discerning before shooting down good guys. With standards like these, patriotic Trump supporters would end up being a very small group.

Don't be like Ann Coulter.

by KNITS
-6
gnostic357 -6 points ago +5 / -11

As far as I know, the causes they support are veteran's causes and nothing else. I heard the owner on an interview last week, and it was all about veterans. They're not an advocate for anything else.

I'd prefer it if they came out openly in favor of Kyle and better yet, did a fundraiser with proceeds from sales going to bail him out. But NOT doing that, doesn't make them evil. :)

0
gnostic357 0 points ago +1 / -1

But they didn't bail on him. They had nothing to do with him as a company. As far as we know, people who work their, possibly the owner himself, may have donated to Kyle. But the COMPANY is not connected to Kyle.

Failing to sponsor someone is not an act of treason. Did you send money to Kyle? I didn't. I support him 100%, but I'm not a sponsor. If people said I sponsored him, and I clarified the fact that I did not - that wouldn't make me a traitor or indicate that I'm against him.

Sometimes the people here act like a fucking mob. They hear someone is a witch, and they're all lighting up their torches.

0
gnostic357 0 points ago +2 / -2

It's ironic that Ann is just like the pedes who have turned on Tucker and Black Rifle Coffee.

She didn't get exactly what she wanted from Trump, so she turned on him.

She says we need Trumpism but with someone better than Trump, apparently unconcerned that Biden and a boatload of Marxists will be running the country if Trump doesn't get his rightful second term.

Allies who are not perfect, or not 100% aligned with you, are not your enemies.

by KNITS
-1
gnostic357 -1 points ago +7 / -8

I understand that they wanted to clear up a misconception. Kyle was wearing a Black Rifle t-shirt, and someone from a Blaze podcast said, "Kyle drinks the best coffee". It looks like BRC was sponsoring not only the show, but Kyle as well.

Canceling their sponsorship of the show seems a step too far, but that sure as hell doesn't make them traitors or non-patriots or bad guys of any type. They have a great mission and it has nothing to do with Kyle or anyone else who isn't a veteran.

But some people at TDW either love you or hate you. Tucker made a mistake? FUCK HIM FOR ALL ETERNITY!!!!!!

smh

-2
gnostic357 -2 points ago +1 / -3

You want to boycott them because they are not a sponsor of Kyle? That makes zero sense. They were probably trying to clear up something going around that wasn't true. They support the military and veterans. That's their mission. They don't do legal cases. That's no reason to boycott someone. 99.99% of companies are not sponsors of Kyle. ffs

by KNITS
14
gnostic357 14 points ago +23 / -9

What's the issue here? They say they're not advocates in legal cases. Most companies aren't.

1
gnostic357 1 point ago +1 / -0

If it was a legitimate win, I think people are respecting the process, but not realizing that the current batch of Dems winning means that Marxism/Socialism/Communism won, and that our Republic is over.

The problem is, we allowed this shit. Insurrection is allowed. Communists are allowed to run for president. Citizens are allowed to assault law enforcement. Our culture is already fucked beyond repair. Kindergartners are taught to be "gender-fluid". White people are pariahs and attacked daily for being White. The lunatics have taken over the asylum, and they've been destroying our country for decades.

So when they put their senile puppet in place as a cheap and dirty trojan horse to slime their way into ultimate power, people don't realize that's what they're accepting. They think they're just being fair and playing by the rules.

What they really have to accept is that we lost the culture war, and the information war, and in the end, we lost America.

If Biden takes the White House, I'm seriously looking at moving to Brazil. Later, after the Marxists have turned the U.S. into a shithole, maybe we can reclaim the place and start fresh with the original constitution, and then see if we can do a better job with Ben Franklin's challenge.

2
gnostic357 2 points ago +2 / -0

We know Justice Alito told them to keep the ballots that arrived after 8pm on the third separated. I've read that poll workers did not adhere to that. And I've also read that they did not keep the envelopes with the ballots. I suspect that was deliberate, because the envelope has the date stamp (if any) and the signature.

If they failed to follow proper procedure, tossing the mailed ballots might be the only option. And you're right. It fits the narrative that Trump is trying to steal the election, but they're going to say that no matter which court issue gives him the win, and now matter how egregious their theft was.

We're in a historic moment that we can recognize, but cannot see or know how major it's going to be in all it's gory detail.. We're like soldiers sitting around in 1776. We know shit is on the horizon, but in the meantime, you still gotta make lunch, chop wood, take out the trash. etc

5
gnostic357 5 points ago +5 / -0

I think the plan is to show incontrovertible evidence that no one could rationally deny.

After that, the irrational will be in the streets and elsewhere, being violent and destructive.

THEN Trump will send in the troops because it will be the only way to restore order - and the Marxists will consider that to be a win-win. They want martial law anyway to turn the masses against the government. The useful idiots won't know that, but the puppetmasters who drive them will.

1
gnostic357 1 point ago +1 / -0

You could send this to [email protected]

It's not evidence per se, but it's something for them to look at, if they haven't already, and that's where they've asked for things to be sent. I've sent them a few things today, like this:

Source: Nevada .gov websites

Total ballots cast: 1,327,394 https://www.nvsos.gov/sos/home/showdocument?id=9054

Total votes for Prez candidates: 1,405,376 https://silverstateelection.nv.gov/USPresidential/#race1

1
gnostic357 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm afraid it probably becomes a circular argument.

Was fraud committed by using U.S. mail? Not if the state legislature okayed it.

But in the case where the state supreme court okayed it, usurping the state legislature, you might have something.

2
gnostic357 2 points ago +2 / -0

I sent this to Trump's people:

Source: Nevada .gov websites

Total ballots cast: 1,327,394 https://www.nvsos.gov/sos/home/showdocument?id=9054

Total votes for Prez candidates: 1,405,376 https://silverstateelection.nv.gov/USPresidential/#race1

1
gnostic357 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm assuming they mixed the invalid ones in with the valid ones. If you can't tell the difference, you gotta toss 'em all.

There'd be no reason to throw them all out otherwise. But like you said, it could just be bad journalism.

1
gnostic357 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm hoping this is just to gather things that will add to what they have. Maybe strengthen their case with additional corroboration. Otherwise, it sounds desperate and weak.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›