2
grad16uc 2 points ago +2 / -0

They could have easily approved with minimal pushback. This is quite a sudden brake pump... wonder what they know.

2
grad16uc 2 points ago +3 / -1

Maybe the FDA sees a sinking ship and wants to have a sliver of credibility in the future.

2
grad16uc 2 points ago +2 / -0

We'll see, but it's not like anyone's mind changes if she suddenly does an about-face.

9
grad16uc 9 points ago +9 / -0

They don't have time for that when they're busy fighting sexism on the homefront. I heard that office rooms are still a little too cold.

3
grad16uc 3 points ago +3 / -0

I always wonder if they like the coddling

2
grad16uc 2 points ago +2 / -0

Who had better control of the media: Goebbels or modern day liberals?

6
grad16uc 6 points ago +6 / -0

People are so impatient. The memes are fun, but this stuff helps the most... even if it doesn't get national coverage.

1
grad16uc 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yea the article didn't support the word 'seize'. Would be huge news if true, but I remain skeptical.

3
grad16uc 3 points ago +3 / -0

Something that we've anecdotally known, but never knew that the FDA issued a warning.

2
grad16uc 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yea we'll meet them there!

2
grad16uc 2 points ago +2 / -0

This decision doesn't even make me think otherwise either tbh. That doesn't mean I support any institution mandating something, but I also don't want judges making that call. Activist judges fucking suck.

If it were a government mandate, that would be a lot different imo.

4
grad16uc 4 points ago +4 / -0

'twill be hilarious to watch... either way

8
grad16uc 8 points ago +9 / -1

That's the beautiful thing about freedom. It doesn't matter what you think.

5
grad16uc 5 points ago +5 / -0

I'm just sitting here wondering how many different shots some people will take before they drop the 'all in this together' bullshit.

view more: Next ›