I'm not saying he did. Scott says he did. Even if, for the sake of argument, we grant that he did flub it, it's a really stupid reason to change your vote.

Scott Adams: "I can fill my white board with good things the President has done, but I don't like how he answered that one question, so he's lost my vote."

Scott Adams has said several times that he basically hates China because of their involvement in the Fentanyl trade. His step-son died of Fentanyl.

He knows that Trump will stand up to China and Biden will cave completely. Yet he won't let President Trump off the hook for something as petty as flubbing the answer to a question? I'm so glad he's not bothered about future Fentanyl and other assorted deaths from China's criminal behavior.

What an asshole

Edit: Never mind. Apparently he was just playing mind games.

The article doesn't address the question foremost in everyone's mind - Did he test positive for COVID?

At least there's silver lining to this whole plandemic thing. If you like movies, I honestly think that the collapse of Hollywood will lead to better movies in the long run.

I always appreciate Jeff Flake speaking out, because then I know the exact wrong position to take. Has this man ever been right about anything in his life?

It used to be that he could vote for whoever he wanted in the privacy of the voting booth and she would be none the wiser. Now with mail-in, she can stand over his shoulder and make sure he votes the way she wants.

Another freedom lost.

Why do so many memes have typos? There's not that many words. Is it really that hard to proofread a couple of times?

Sorry to vent. It's just starting to get on my nerves.

How does the USPS determine whether a ballot is absentee or mail in?

Vox is a symbol if elitism and exclusion. Listen to @SwitchedOnPop and @nyphil explain why.

This article is from 2013. What has happened since then? Did things turn out well or not?

Let's not turn into SJW's who put everything under a microscope to find something that offends us.

For example,

HBO Max’s latest sci-fi series Raised by Wolves does both by espousing how belief in religion “weakens” the human mind and atheism is "the only path to progress."

I've only watched two episodes, but the series does not espouse that. A character on the series espouses that, but that character is hardly held up as a role model.

I don't know where the series is going at this point, but it's interesting so far. I'm not saying it's very profound, but it's nice to have some sci-fi that doesn't just sweep religion under the rug or portray all religious people as complete wackos.

Not sure it's much to brag about. Sounds like she did all the work.

I think it's nice you're providing them a purpose in life.

Are they targeting you? No other comments have that many downvotes.

Exactly right and I loved your example. Thanks for the laugh.

Then I noticed - downvotes? WTH?

Remember that there were plenty of people around President Trump that loved to leak to the press, and the press loved to report every disparaging rumour about Trump. And yet, there was not a single whiff of this anywhere until the Atlantic article. If this were really true, we would have heard about it long before now.

Every single one of the men on that plane would despise the assholes who call themselves Antifa today.

Trust the plan = sit back and do nothing.

Man the polls = get out, get involved and do something.

If it didn't say "The Lincoln Project", I'd think this was supposed to be a pro-Trump cartoon.

I guess it is true, the left really can't meme.

January 2015 attack and the trial is just starting 5 and a half years later? Is that normal for the French justice system?

"... can be caused ..." - But were they?

"Many would have developed ..." - How many?

In other words, we really don't know how many died from actual Covid-19 and no one can tell us. It's certainly a lot less than the 180,000 figure they keep pushing.

They don't. They're just lying political hacks who lie.

Thanks for letting everyone know the plan. Let's hope the leakers don't ever see this.

The article gives a Democrat the chance to explain how this is a bad thing. It does not give the same opportunity to anyone in favor of ending the declaration.

This "journalistic" technique seems to be very common.

They'll somehow blame President Trump for it. Just like they credit Obama for anything good that has happened since President Trump was elected.