The GBI just concluded an audit a couple of hours ago. https://www.wsbtv.com/news/local/cobb-county/gbi-finishes-signature-audit-cobb-county-finds-only-two-mismatches/ON42CSQBORHYJDBGZKKMPC3YAQ/?utm_campaign=snd-autopilot

Removal of section 230 would be very very bad. We don't want this.

You realize that if section 230 is repealed, then sites like this one would likely cease to exist. YouTube and other content that user-created would be heavily censored. It's a rabbit hole for government control of user-produced content across the internet.

And if the Electoral Count Act of 1887 is removed, giving plenary power to Pence, what prevents its abuse from future Democrat Vice Presidents?

Told you..

Under the Twelfth Amendment, the Vice President presides over the count, but the Act constrains the Vice President's role in it.

Both houses can overrule the Vice President's decision to include or exclude votes and, under the Act, even if the chambers disagree, the governor's certification, not the Vice President, breaks the tie.

And since there's only one set certified by the Governor, it would fail.

This is why Gohmert recently sued Pence; an attempt to get a judge to overturn the Electoral Count Act.

If that's truly the case, then what precluded Gore from doing this in 2000 and basically selecting only the electors that would ultimately make him President?

This.

It would also be evident in the hand recount. The machines just tabulate counts. Even if the same ballot could count for more than one vote, it would be blatantly obvious in the hand count when the totals have heavily diverged.

I hate to say it, but this video alone isn't enough to really prove anything. It's beginning to feel like a forced narrative. There needs to be OTHER hard (keyword) evidence that backs up the assumptions made in this video.

How does the Perdue/Loeffler runoff factor here? Currently there's a 52/48 majority, but doesn't their terms technically end before a vote would happen on January 6? That'd make it 48/50.

I would leave off the last bit; anything that can be perceived as a threat should NOT be said.

Has there been any indication they're going to take up the case? The safe harbor date is next week. If they're going to take up any cases, they need to be taken up and settled on by next Tuesday (Dec 8)

By counting the paper ballot, I think, yes? Which does not involve the machines. The second recount — that’s ongoing now — is a rescan of the ballots into the machines.

If those two recounts match, then doesn’t that verify the machines? Or is there something else at play?

Again, this is what I’m failing to understand about the recent hand count. Doesn’t the hand count confirm a 1:1 with the (initial) machine tabulation?

If the initial tally was 1,000 votes, 600 Trump, 400 Biden and a hand count of those 1,000 ballots yield the same numbers, does that not verify the machines?

I’m not questioning the validity of the ballots themselves, just the claims about the machines swapping counts, etc.

Has this been proven? I’d love to read about this if you have a source.

But the recent hand count did not involve the machines at all, which basically confirms no nefarious involvement from the machines, correct?

The machines just tabulate (count) ballots that were casted by hand. If the hand recount matches the machine tabulations, then how is an algorithm at play?

Serious question, how and/or why do the machines matter after the hand recount of the paper ballots?

This is what I'm most curious about. On the registrations, there's two sections involving address: 2 and 3.

Section 2 requires the address you use is your actual residence. Section 3 is the address you want your ballot mailed to. I'd like to know if:

1. Section 3 allows for PO Boxes (it appears it does, but not clear that it doesn't)
2. Which section is his data using? Section 2 or section 3?

60 days? Try 20 days (Dec 14)

The one big thing I question here is the differences between section 2 and 3.

Is it legal for someone to use a PO Box (or non-resident address in general) for section 3, as long as section 2 contains their actual residential address? If that's the case, then which section is his data using?

I'd want that confirmed before I buy more into this.

He's going to get all these ballots tossed out! GA law does NOT allow using PO box addresses to request absentee ballots.

What happens when the state has already certified the results?

To fix what, exactly?

Exactly. Much more posturing and gaslighting, and it begins to feel like manufactured shit.

If it's not, then I would take issue with that and consider it gaslighting. If she's got the goods, then it needs to be front and center for EVERYONE to see.