1
gumoto 1 point ago +1 / -0

No - it this guy is legit and he sounds it You just run the ballots thru his machine and it will tell you whether it was a postal vote, whether it was officially issued and whether the post itself was marked electronically or by a person. Says, he could run millions per day.

THe law says those ballots must be retained for 22 months.

1
gumoto 1 point ago +1 / -0

Do it - I can't even see it in the rising section - only way I can find it is via the message notification to me

1
gumoto 1 point ago +1 / -0

I can't actually see it anywhere now

3
gumoto 3 points ago +3 / -0

That is why everyone should have an autistic friend. They needed it because they are usually socially incompetent and we needed it so that we are not stupid.

4
gumoto 4 points ago +4 / -0

And - as he says - it's scientific - no he said she says crap I will be disappointed if this is not done. It's a bare minimum. And the DNC have no valid reason to resist.

7
gumoto 7 points ago +7 / -0

Well I am in Australia - so you guys will have to get this to all the legal teams: Powell, Guliani, et al and phone them Fully credible - And geeks like this don't fall of ftrees

No doubt you can get to the bottom of it

4
gumoto 4 points ago +4 / -0

Actually, the injured parties are the legislatures of MI, WI,PA and GA They each need to send the Texas suit with their names on it. The problem, I imagine is that they would need to hold a vote to progress the suit against its own executive.

2
gumoto 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well, Rudy needs to resubmit this suits with the respective legislatures - like yesterday

2
gumoto 2 points ago +2 / -0

most of them couldn't follow a shopping list ffs

3
gumoto 3 points ago +4 / -1

There is a more importnat battle right now

2
gumoto 2 points ago +2 / -0

The points and concerns you raise are valid. Unfortunately, I don't possess the legal training to comment. Except to say, a common code for Federal Elections would be ideal. But, it also seems that the current method can work if the respective constitutions are faithfully followed. A Scotus decision in favour of Texas would achieve just that.

It may not properly answer your concerns but I'm not sure too many governors would permit this to occur again in a hurry.

-2
gumoto -2 points ago +5 / -7

This is not the time to flirt with this - it will be used against us and the site. deport!

The last thing td.win needs. Lets not give the cucked mainstream media any ammunition to label the site anti-semite.

2
gumoto 2 points ago +2 / -0

Seems to me there are two paths lie ahead in the event SCOTUS rules for Texas

1\ The precedent embarrasses the offending states and their executive, thereby increases the pressure to ensure that, in the future, any and all changes are legally confirmed by the respective State Legislature.

2\ Added pressure for a unified election code across all states for Federal Elections.

1
gumoto 1 point ago +1 / -0

LOL they still have not conceded the 2016 election. Totally deranged - like that mad Johnston freak

2
gumoto 2 points ago +2 / -0

Does anyone know if there is footage of the suitcases being placed under the table? I saw footage somewhere of the table carried into position in the morning but not when the suitcases were subsequently placed under the table or by whom.

This piece of information seems to be missing in all the highlighted video footage. Or where the suitcases somehow how attached to the underbelly of the table?

1
gumoto 1 point ago +1 / -0

No word on whether these people are arrested and charged

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›