Of course they are in on the steal. Just look at Kemp and the SoS of GA. I am no longer sure Kemp actually won the election in GA the way he is acting.
Thanks for pointing out another news source I can blacklist.
Getting scared.
All of this is true, or at least has been reported as such for years. This is 100% irrefutable evidence the MSM is BS. They have reported on this in the past, now call it conspiracy theory. Lazy Tucker could have talked about this. I do not fault him for calling out Powell if he thinks she is a phony, I criticize him for not doing basic homework on her claims.
That guy lives in portland.
Same here, had two on the elections. However both were not fortunate for Trump. The good thing is that although I have has some dreams that were astoundingly accurate in terms of prediction, most are just the usual combination of things that travel through my mind and subjects that circulate at any particular instance.
I would say not. They are the straight faced serious attorneys of Trumps personally. You don't get phony sensationalism, shit talking, empty threats from them, if they say something big is going to happen, based on their history, it probably will.
I dont think its anything Powell mentioned. First I heard of it was today watching a newsmax clip. Jordan Sekulow is reliable, no drip, drip, he is a professional and boring attorney which is good.
DJT, he has picked his official team and strategy.
its expensive to start planning for something that wont happen. Hillary's Fireworks.
Yes, Yes, and Yes. What I have heard from Powell is mostly a mix of things that were known about Dominion for several years. Some of these things the Feds were made aware of and did nothing about.
Circuit courts being re-assigned means BS. Barnes cleared this up.
I am a libtard, I believe everything on Twitter and Google.
The left can't meme. Still.
That second quote has nothing to do with Sidney, just that his analysis seems to be very correct, he is watching what comes through the Twitter grapevine and clarifying it from a legal perspective, a very informed one.
Which includes checks and balances, and election law being followed. So yes, he is respecting it, thats what respect looks like.
And its assigned by seniority, Roberts, Sotomeyer and Kagen get districts as well. It looks so earth shattering because of the states in the districts, but thats only because we have a good majority on the court so chance would lend itself to a "good guy" landing in a contested state.
His analysis is spot on. I was previously posting about the SCOTUS jurisdiction thing seeming like a nothingburger (not a lawyer, so I did not know). Have been posting things he outlines about Powell too and people DV the shit out of me, but I dont care. I want the truth, not false hope Mueller type shit.
That SCOTUS jurisdiction thing, where all the conservative judges were assigned to all the swing states, has no meaning whatsoever... YES
Ok the Sekulows dont BS. No Tick Tock from these guys. You can take this to the bank.
Good. We need to focus on the mountains of evidence that can be proven quickly and get the illegal ballots invalidated. With Trump at the helm for another 4 years, Sydney will have the resources she needs to bring such a massive case.
Its a good thing. We know, and have known a lot of what she is saying is true, however, the scope of the case we can derive from public comments would be massive, and impossible to put together in a short time frame. None of the claims are needed, there is massive evidence of election fraud, and massive instances of courts overstepping their powers to create legislation from the bench. We have unregistered voters, people voting twice, ballot arriving after deadline, procedures not followed all over the place. We need nothing of what Sydney Powell has publicly talked about to invalidate the illegal votes that give Biden the election. I find the "spokesperson's" comments in the article very encouraging.
Although I agree this time around, both candidates need to be extremely vocal about where they stand.