Well, there is some ray of hope, we already got a 4-4 split decision that sent case back to lower court ruling. Same case. There was an agreement to review after elections with a full court. So that's a strong indicator we have 4 of 5 votes needed. By no means a definite, but strong enough.
Id hardly care considering all the other massive shit that matters going on.
If a precedent gets established, could have major implications for other states. It could be narrow and apply only to PA, could apply to all ballots cast after election night.
Thats where we are however. That good system you have heard about all your life, it doesnt exist.
Courts are F'N backwards. Predictions almost impossible.
They throw out votes after 8:00PM on election night, ineligible voters, double counts. There would be plenty. All comes down to SCOTUS and how far they are willing to go.
Yeah, might be looking at throwing out Philly votes after 8:00 on election night.
Yeah, will have to see what happens in SCOTUS. You can never apply how the law is written and expect ruling to go in your favor. Unpopular opinion, but, we have 4 partisan SCOTUS judges and ACB (yet to be determined) and I hope she is partisan as hell.
That surprises you? How do you think all this mail in voting fraud shit was allowed in the first place? Went through same courts.
We have checks and balances, as long as you dont check or balance, we are good.
We shall see how this pans out on Friday I guess. Not expecting much at state level.
We will see where this gets us though. Thats all I am saying.
It could, it looks really, really bad in any case. It will look really bad in front of SCOTUS. Who knows what that will mean. If they have the guts to rule as they should, we could be facing another election, or the inability to certify PA. If that happens in another state or Trump flips GA, Joe doesnt have 270 electoral votes.
They are part of the plan and dont understand, but still part of the plan indeed.
People born before 1940 are not rare at all LOL
The judges are not even capable of understanding how kicking out observers lends itself to election fraud, let alone statistics and distributed systems. I dont think this will see the light of day other than a passing comment in a courtroom.
Why should we trust him?
Im torn on it, part of me thinks so, part of me thinks the GOP does not have their shit together at all.
You seen these judges though? They are like 3rd grade level. GOP... Hard evidence... DNC Lawyer, but we play fair... Judge, they said they play fair, I dont understand why we dont take them at their word.
2500 people over 80 registered to vote is waaaaaaaaayyyyy wrong.
What else big has he proven himself on?
Yeah, I was not expecting any big movement at state level. Its almost built in. These same judges heard the GOP arguments against all the mail in ballot shit and dismissed them. This comes down to a SCOTUS vote, it just does.
Its an audit too. In theory, they can look at suspicious ballots and interview voters, cross reference ineligible voters, the votes get re-run through machine so they can only be scanned one time. This is such a big steal, I dont know what to expect in reality though.
Problem is, they did not allow a challenge, this gets messy fast. But from all I know and hear, they are moving to invalidate loads of ballots for these reasons.
Thats partisan now.