2
handpeople 2 points ago +2 / -0

Only potential downside is Republican in person election day is down. Maybe a lot of older Republicans actually doing mail in this year. I dont think its the case, but admittedly, I am shocked, seeing it in OH and MI as well. I am a natural pessimist. I think chances of above are slim, but early voting numbers are devastating. Also Joe might be trying a sneak strategy of taking NC and GA.

2
handpeople 2 points ago +2 / -0

Here is the thing. I dont see people without masks. I live in FL, I would say 99% of people wear masks while in public indoors. On another note, lets see you try to knock my teeth out faggot.

3
handpeople 3 points ago +3 / -0

In my middle school home economics class, we had to run a restaurant for the staff for a week out of our classroom. This was late 80s. There would probably be lawsuits now, we served Mexican food, I am sure everything would be inappropriate now.

2
handpeople 2 points ago +2 / -0

Everything in the 80's... Ninja's, hot bitches, motorcycles, karate, lasers, machine guns, eye patches. The shit that comes out today is 98% soy.

7
handpeople 7 points ago +7 / -0

Thats insane, maybe I am old or something, but thats like saying Free food poisoning on orders over 20 dollars.

1
handpeople 1 point ago +1 / -0

The guy is really worth a follow. He is obviously in for Trump but his analysis in 2016 was really close and dead on. He doesn't just sugar coat it all either, if he raises a flag, you can take it to the bank.

1
handpeople 1 point ago +1 / -0

Most polls are bad for Biden when scrutinized. They understand most people are accustomed to looking at the score. We are not measuring touchdowns here however.

16
handpeople 16 points ago +16 / -0

I am surprised this is considered a feature for Venmo. Regardless of whether or not this is real, if Venmo allows people to publicly view transaction history WHOA, what am I missing here. How is this conceivably desirable.

4
handpeople 4 points ago +4 / -0

He sees the fake ones too, and even those look good. The fake ones are bad for Biden. That's what a lot of people are missing here. Any poll that does not publish methodology, is automatically out, whether its good for Trump or not. Most polls do, and they are bad for Biden.

11
handpeople 11 points ago +11 / -0

This is insane. FL is looking good, way better than 2016. If FL does not go for Trump, take it to the courts, there is no way Biden takes FL.

1
handpeople 1 point ago +1 / -0

The polls have over favored Democrats for at least 45 years. Several polls had Mondale up by 16 points in 1984. They had Dukakis up by 12, they had Carter up, Kerry + 16 (I was convinced Bush had no chance at all), they had Hillary up by 12. They failed not only in the US, but the UK miserably with Brexit and the last general. Polls have an innate liberal virus. This is nothing new, its a bit more pronounced now but the only difference is that pre-2016, more polls showed consolidation when election day was approaching. They still show consolidation, just not as much. There are also infinitely more pollsters now then 30 years ago. I am an anomaly on this site. I dont say... fuck the polls, I think valuable data can be extrapolated from them. Right now, and for some time, that valuable information is in Trumps favor. Yes, the polls are in Trumps favor.

2
handpeople 2 points ago +2 / -0

No doubt. They are doing that in PA. Voter fraud in the other states that matter (ones that are not already massively blue) is harder to pull off if challenged. PA however is a free for all, the court stopped short of basically ordering the states electors to vote for Biden in the Electoral College, barely short.

7
handpeople 7 points ago +7 / -0

Good. Put Biden up +20. Makes the shit taste so much worse going down on election day.

4
handpeople 4 points ago +4 / -0

Get out of here, noob, shill, 0 history. JK. I had the same problem, luckily my browser saves the PW.

1
handpeople 1 point ago +1 / -0

We call people "Bad" when they are actually bad, and we call people "Bad" when they are actually good. Same concept. Glad English is my first language.

4
handpeople 4 points ago +4 / -0

If we factor massive obvious voter fraud, Dems could take all 50 states, so I am just stating that. That said... I actually think FL is safe Trump now, I am leaning to MI as well. AZ and NC I would not consider so safe to include in worst case scenario, especially NC due to turnout and early vote numbers. I am basing this on ev turnout numbers, early ballot party affiliation returns by mail, new voter registration numbers where available for the most part

1
handpeople 1 point ago +1 / -0

Best case... PA is a court battle. Luckily, we dont need it.

1
handpeople 1 point ago +1 / -0

I am of the opinion this court would strike down the 1994 AWB. People say it was constitutional and would survive again if passed, I have my doubts. The 1994 court was not nearly as conservative.

2
handpeople 2 points ago +2 / -0

She knows its nuts too, court packing is just playing with emotions of far left. I am rational, I dont expect abortion to be illegal and voter id to be mandatory, because I know how the system works. They dont. This is basically Pelosi telling them, go ask your dad.

4
handpeople 4 points ago +4 / -0

Court packing is crazy town fucking nuts. It gets thrown around like its viable or something. Imagine the GOP banning all abortions, all birth control, legalizing explosive devices, requiring voter ID, banning immigration, all in one day. We know thats Larp shit, they don't. They are immature children that do not know how the political system actually works.

5
handpeople 5 points ago +5 / -0

To some degree, but historically its tended to rally conservatives.

16
handpeople 16 points ago +16 / -0

This one goes to 11.

by T100
1
handpeople 1 point ago +1 / -0

Expansion to 13 judges after Trump's re-election, they OK with that I assume?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›