by Dride
1
handpeople 1 point ago +1 / -0

The bigger thing people are missing is that it only take a state legislator to sue over this and there is no question about standing. I am aware of no state lagislator that has done this.

4
handpeople 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yup, sounded like it to me.

1
handpeople 1 point ago +2 / -1

I was hoping tacos.

2
handpeople 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well, we know what his main job is then LOL

2
handpeople 2 points ago +2 / -0

The constitutional plan just makes sense. Does not indicate whether he is plugged in. Is he claiming to be? Plugged into what?

2
handpeople 2 points ago +2 / -0

There were calls to give Trump phony briefings in 2016, a lot of humming and hawing over his access to info, so no doubt Obama admin was not very responsive.

1
handpeople 1 point ago +1 / -0

Odds like these are always personal opinion, because they are given on things that have not happened when there is no finite possibilities of outcome such as flipping a coin.

2
handpeople 2 points ago +3 / -1

Question? What is the purpose of having a lot of upvotes? I am not making a statement, I actually don't know the reason.

53
handpeople 53 points ago +53 / -0

Yup, that is why Tuberville news is really awesome because it will force the GOP to vote. We get to watch all the Rick Scott's that want to hide like rats stress about it. It ruins their holiday. Mitch Said as much, he said... "It would force us to take a terrible vote against the President". Well, I want to see it, if you are going to cuck out, I want it to be on record, in the open, and slam every one of you during your re-election bids when the time arises.

1
handpeople 1 point ago +1 / -0

The holidays are indeed coming Why start the meetings in the first place if there are other plans These lead up meetings tend to be ceremonial Its another chance to rile Biden Because of holidays we know a lot of staff is out and they are short handed They stated they are committed to a productive transition, Why say this

VS.

Maybe its because the military is going to intervene based on really no evidence and the unlikelyhood of such a scenario.

Balance the two, and 95/5 is a good estimate.

1
handpeople 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sure. But gets tangled in the plausibility loop, we dont really know the actual situation with the cyber attack, also plausible its over hyped to prop up RUssia, Russia, Russia.

1
handpeople 1 point ago +3 / -2

They generally say a source familiar with. I am quite sure Axios has a list of contacts that are of seniority.

2
handpeople 2 points ago +2 / -0

Definitely, we dont know he is using the bathroom. He could be in the Situation room with Navy Seals.

1
handpeople 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think there is an element of fuck you Joe Biden in the reasoning, the driving element perhaps.

1
handpeople 1 point ago +1 / -0

Its not that I think its exactly what is happening, I think the information we are given does not leap to insurrection act or military intervention into this election. So I would say, 95% chance its some dumb reason if not exactly the holidays, 5% chance it means something is happening with the military over the election.

1
handpeople 1 point ago +1 / -0

There are endless could be good signs, there are endless could be bad signs as well.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›